Posted on 05/12/2014 12:32:11 PM PDT by Hillary'sMoralVoid
Hillary gave us a glimpse of her mode of dealing conflict even before Bill was elected president. Her tacit admission that she still loved him despite his sexual daliances revealed her personal, fatal deficiency in dealing with real conflict.
On the fateful night of 9/11/12, she recognized the potential and dreaded comparisons with the Carter Administration and its failed hostage mission. With a potentially plausible cover story of the video, her political instincts were to avoid conflict, even if it meant the death of Americans in Libya. She "leaned forward" with the lie and broadcast it to the world, to cover her own failure in securing the Libya mission before, during and after the disastrous attacks.
Her failure to declare Boko Haram a terrorist organization is yet another recent example of her willingness to avoid conflict. Her entire tenure as Secretary of State is characterized by indecision, avoidance and a lack of courage in difficult situations.
Her phrase "what difference does it make" is a perfect metaphor for her entire vacuous tenure as Secretary of State. It is just the most recent chapter of a larger empty resume.
Hillary is widely rumored to be a female. If you take that as a given, then Hillary has the ultimate qualification for president in 2016.
Moderate Republican women will cross the aisle to vote for Hillary.
I remember Hillary’s absurd ads when she ran for pres, among which was her saying she will take the 3 a.m. phone calls when world crises erupt suddenly.
And Hillary said how she had passed the commander in chief test, and McCain had passed that test, but Obama had not passed the commander in chief test.
Hillary didn’t do too well with her 3 a.m. Benghazi moment.
She does have an empty resume. The one real chance she had on an important case early in her career wound up with her being fired for being unethical, dishonest and incompetent.
Those seem to be just the qualities the left looks for in the highest public officials.
Hillary didn’t stand up for “women’s rights” when she had the opportunity. She sought $Billions for Pakistan while their record of abuse on women is unthinkable. Over 70% of the women in Pakistani prison are there because they were raped.
Hillary contributed to the “war on women.”
She even flunked her 9:00 am moment - when the Embassy asked for more security before the attack and she refused.
The fact that Hillary was fired for these in regards Richard Nixon’s impeachment should be shouted to the rooftops.
Biased, evil and untrustworthy Waaay back then too.
She truly is an empty pantsuit and beyond that she is pure evil. My knowledge of Hillary goes back to the Whitewater days when it was pointed out that she authored the contracts for the Whitewater properties and hid in the fine print a clause that if you missed one payment the previous payments reverted to rent and you no longer had a claim on the property. Now that is an evil person considering that most of the people buying those lots were older people looking for a retirement location. Evil just pure evil. And don’t get me started on the Vince Foster affair.
What exactly does “declaring” Boko Haram a terrorist operation DO to Boko Haram?
Jack up their insurance or something?
It would ban banks from doing business with them.
Hillary’s resume isn’t empty!!! I don’t know why people keep saying this.
Just because it’s filled with nothing but lies and corruption going back to the mid 70’s......
Bump for later
I don’t think Hillary avoids conflict.
As semi-co-president in the 90s, it appeared she relished destroying people for just being so unlucky as to be in the way. That said, Bill was the enforcer for the actual corruption she initiated so you might have a point.
I'm sure they all have to swipe their Boko Haram cards at the ATMs in Nigeria.
Perhaps the difference is whether or not she is publicly tied to something. She’s a vicious backstabber when in the shadows, and indecisive when she has personal responsibility?
You’re thinking of Bogo Haram, which translates as “50% off sales are forbidden”.
She only attacked “soft targets” like all ledftists do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.