Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Trouble With Rubio
The Federalist ^ | 05/14/2014 | David Harsanyi

Posted on 05/14/2014 8:13:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

On Sunday, Marco Rubio informed Jonathan Karl on ABC’s This Week that he was ready to be president. “I think a president has to have a clear vision of where the country needs to go and clear ideas about how to get it there,” he went on. “And I think we’re very blessed in our party to have a number of people that fit that criteria.” And, as the National Review’s Eliana Johnson reports, the one-time Tea Party favorite is also now a favorite of the “establishment” – due mainly to his willingness to champion immigration reform and his ethnic background.

So, apparently, other people believe he’s ready, as well.

Rubio seems a plausible option for Republicans in 2016. Falling somewhere between Jeb Bush-Chris Christie and the purportedly unelectable Rand Paul-Ted Cruz, Rubio is the sort of comfortable choice Republicans tend to decide on. As Johnson points out, experts see numerous advantageous aspects to a Rubio presidential candidacy: He’s a proven conservative with a moderate demeanor, he’s comparatively youthful with a strong presence and he has the ability to engage in Hispanic outreach. Hailing from an important state doesn’t hurt, either.

And yet …

For me, at least, the promise of Rubio seldom corresponds with the reality. Whenever I listen to him these days, all I hear is Mitt Romney. If he’s really imbued with all these formidable political skills, why do so many of his appearances feel stilted? If he’s one of fresh faces of a new GOP, why are his speeches crammed with platitudes that may have packed a serious punch in 1984? It’s not that he’s substantively wrong (though he offers so little in that regard), it’s not that he’s off-putting, it’s that he never really generates the sort of excitement or displays the sort of political acumen his reputation might have you believe he can, should or will.

When Rubio was christened the “The Republican Savior” by Time in 2013, it was immigration reform –specifically his backing for a pathway to citizenship — that would be his first test of leadership; his chance, according to magazine, to show Republicans “that he’s not just geographically, demographically and ideologically correct.” And did he pass? Agree with him or not, Rubio’s time with the Gang of Eight featured some impressive moments. He didn’t shy away from critics. He went on talk radio and passionately argued his case. The base was mad, but likely forgive him. What should be more concerning, though, is the political naiveté he displayed allowing Democrats to use the issue – and him – to bludgeon the GOP. Rubio, in the end, was forced to step away from the entire mess, which makes it a failure on both a political and policy level.

And Rubio’s subsequent pandering was his way of letting everyone know he was “severely” conservative. His conservative voting record is first-rate according to American Conservative Union. But exactly how challenging is it for a Republican senator in the minority to oppose Barack Obama over the past five years? Not very. Others with comparable ACU grades include Mitch McConnell and about a dozen others. There’s nothing wrong with Rubio’s boilerplate anti-Obama positioning, but there’s nothing especially unique about it, either.

Successful presidential candidates will often tap into the restive anxieties of American life – Reagan with invasive government and Obama with the inequities of capitalism, to name two. Perhaps an issue will arise that Rubio can grab, but right now he’s a bit out of step with his own party’s evolution. It was amusing to see Rubio following Mike Lee and others, tepidly aiming his guns at corporate cronyism this week — “big companies may not like big government, but they can afford to deal with it.” The issue seemed manufactured. He also unveiled a yawn-inducing “policy agenda” this week, which was overshadowed by his inability to handle some uncomplicated questions about climate change.

Rubio, it should be noted, saves his most potent rhetoric for foreign policy. According to a 2012 National Journal piece, “Accepting the Neocon Torch: Marco Rubio,” when “pushed for a more forceful U.S. response in confronting a dictator in Syria and autocrat in Nicaragua, Rubio said, he was thwarted — mainly by Republicans. ‘Today in the Senate on foreign policy, the further you move to the right, the likelier you are to wind up on the left.’” Well, the idea that interventionism is an inherently right-wing position is false. More importantly, though, as conservatism moves towards a more balanced debate on the limits of foreign policy, Rubio’s hardline position will be less appealing to voters (unless, events change this reality, which can always happen).

So what exactly has Rubio done to merit his frontrunner status?

From the National Review:

Rubio’s background, particularly his Cuban-American heritage, is a big part of the draw. Bob Wickers, a former aide to Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee, says the party’s establishment is simply “enamored” of Rubio’s background, adding also that Rubio is “not a Cuban American like Ted Cruz is a Cuban American.” That’s a sly acknowledgment that, in the wake of last year’s government shutdown, for which Cruz was the most public face, the Texas senator made few friends among the party’s financial kingmakers.

Sly, indeed. The idea that being a Cuban American– the right kind, even – will play a hand in dramatically moving the Hispanic vote is a silly one. (In a poll of likely Latino voters taken last summer, Hillary was beating Rubio by a 66-28 margin.) About as silly as claiming someone is ready to president because you’re enamored with his ethnicity.

Surely, there are Republicans in the Senate who can generate more enthusiasm among conservatives, and there are surely reform-minded governors out there who can offer more compelling ideas and boast of more accomplishments. Not all of them are as charismatic as Rubio – but many of them are. Now, that’s only my perception. Like with many things, I could be mistaken. Maybe America has another Ronald Reagan on its hands. After all, I’ve been told that people are enthusiastic about the prospects of a Rubio candidacy. I’ve just yet to meet one these people in real life.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fl; florida; marcorubio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2014 8:13:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rubio backs amnesty—’Nuff said.


2 posted on 05/14/2014 8:15:50 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Shoot cops that shoot dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rubio Who?


3 posted on 05/14/2014 8:19:40 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Amnesty Dough Boy’s dream of open borders somehow does not appeal to me.


4 posted on 05/14/2014 8:20:52 AM PDT by Dagnabitt (Amnesty is Treason. Its agents are Traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Help support Free Republic



please click the pic
donate today to the most conservative online site!


5 posted on 05/14/2014 8:21:57 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears
Unfortunately, so do all the others.

And I, for one, will not be voiting for any candidate that supports making illegals, legal.

That includes Ted Cruz, though he tries to minimize his talk on his position for legalization, he would still grant permanent residency and legal status.

But he says it's not "Amnesty".

6 posted on 05/14/2014 8:23:29 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rubio could have soared with a good performance with immigration. Instead, he crashed and burned. There is potential for a real center-right solution to the issue, but he went somewhere center-left or worse and than ruined a lot of good will lying about it and voting with Schumer on ALL of the right’s suggested changes.


7 posted on 05/14/2014 8:24:04 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

The problem with eliminating someone over a single issue is nobody will ever make the cut. Rubio isn’t my choice at this point. We could do better. That said, we could also do worse. The Virginia primary is fairly late in the process. If it is still competitive and comes down to Rubio and someone like Bush or Christie, I’d crawl through hat coals to vote for Marco and hold congress accountable in ensuring he never has an opportunity to sign an immigration bill.


8 posted on 05/14/2014 8:30:20 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
The problem with eliminating someone over a single issue is nobody will ever make the cut.

Amnesty is a deal-breaker for conservatives. Period.

9 posted on 05/14/2014 8:34:02 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Obamacare: You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21; kinganamort; katherineisgreat; floriduh voter; summer; Goldwater Girl; windchime; ...

Florida Freeper


10 posted on 05/14/2014 8:34:39 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The "American People" are no longer capable of self-governance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dagnabitt

We could do a little better; we could do a lot worse:

Cruz (TX) - - 100% (Average) - 100% (Heritage) - 100% (CFG) - 100% (ACU) - 100% (FreedomWorks)

Lee (UT) - 2016 - 100% (Average) - 100% (Heritage) - 100% (CFG) - 100% (ACU) - 100% (FreedomWorks)

Paul (KY) - 2016 - 97% (Average) - 96% (Heritage) - 97% (CFG) - 96% (ACU) - 100% (FreedomWorks)

Rubio (FL) - 2016 - 92% (Average) - 87% (Heritage) - 91% (CFG) - 96% (ACU) - 95% (FreedomWorks)

Scott (SC) - 06/10/14 - 92% (Average) - 93% (Heritage) - 94% (CFG) - 96% (ACU) - 86% (FreedomWorks)

Risch (ID) - 05/20/14 - 91% (Average) - 86% (Heritage) - 94% (CFG) - 92% (ACU) - 95% (FreedomWorks)

Inhofe (OK) - 06/24/14 - 91% (Average) - 89% (Heritage) - 94% (CFG) - 92% (ACU) - 90% (FreedomWorks)

Crapo (ID) - 2016 - 89% (Average) - 79% (Heritage) - 92% (CFG) - 88% (ACU) - 95% (FreedomWorks)

Coburn (OK) - 2016 - 88% (Average) - 81% (Heritage) - 93% (CFG) - 100% (ACU) - 76% (FreedomWorks)

Cornyn (TX) - 03/04/14 - 88% (Average) - 86% (Heritage) - 93% (CFG) - 96% (ACU) - 76% (FreedomWorks)

Johnson (WI) - 2016 - 87% (Average) - 89% (Heritage) - 87% (CFG) - 96% (ACU) - 77% (FreedomWorks)

Roberts (KS) - 08/05/14 - 87% (Average) - 90% (Heritage) - 84% (CFG) - 84% (ACU) - 91% (FreedomWorks)

Grassley (IA) - 2016 - 86% (Average) - 82% (Heritage) - 86% (CFG) - 88% (ACU) - 86% (FreedomWorks)

Toomey (PA) - 2016 - 85% (Average) - 76% (Heritage) - 93% (CFG) - 80% (ACU) - 91% (FreedomWorks)

Enzi (WY) - 08/19/14 - 85% (Average) - 76% (Heritage) - 94% (CFG) - 88% (ACU) - 82% (FreedomWorks)

Sessions (AL) - 06/03/14 - 84% (Average) - 79% (Heritage) - 88% (CFG) - 88% (ACU) - 82% (FreedomWorks)

McConnell (KY) - 05/20/14 - 83% (Average) - 80% (Heritage) - 87% (CFG) - 92% (ACU) - 73% (FreedomWorks)

Heller (NV) - - 81% (Average) - 71% (Heritage) - 89% (CFG) - 83% (ACU) - 82% (FreedomWorks)

Vitter (LA) - 2016 - 81% (Average) - 75% (Heritage) - 78% (CFG) - 79% (ACU) - 91% (FreedomWorks)

Barrasso (WY) - - 79% (Average) - 76% (Heritage) - 85% (CFG) - 88% (ACU) - 68% (FreedomWorks)

Shelby (AL) - 2016 - 76% (Average) - 76% (Heritage) - 82% (CFG) - 76% (ACU) - 68% (FreedomWorks)

Flake (AZ) - - 75% (Average) - 58% (Heritage) - 84% (CFG) - 71% (ACU) - 85% (FreedomWorks)

Coats (IN) - 2016 - 73% (Average) - 70% (Heritage) - 75% (CFG) - 83% (ACU) - 65% (FreedomWorks)

Thune (SD) - 2016 - 73% (Average) - 65% (Heritage) - 80% (CFG) - 88% (ACU) - 59% (FreedomWorks)

Moran (KS) - 2016 - 72% (Average) - 66% (Heritage) - 75% (CFG) - 80% (ACU) - 67% (FreedomWorks)

Fischer (NE) - 2016 - 71% (Average) - 64% (Heritage) - 74% (CFG) - 76% (ACU) - 68% (FreedomWorks)

Burr (NC) - 2016 - 70% (Average) - 62% (Heritage) - 67% (CFG) - 84% (ACU) - 67% (FreedomWorks)

Hatch (UT) - - 70% (Average) - 60% (Heritage) - 76% (CFG) - 75% (ACU) - 70% (FreedomWorks)

Boozman (AR) - 2016 - 69% (Average) - 71% (Heritage) - 70% (CFG) - 80% (ACU) - 55% (FreedomWorks)

Ayotte (NH) - 2016 - 67% (Average) - 57% (Heritage) - 79% (CFG) - 68% (ACU) - 64% (FreedomWorks)

Portman (OH) - 2016 - 64% (Average) - 57% (Heritage) - 71% (CFG) - 64% (ACU) - 64% (FreedomWorks)

Johanns (NE) - 05/13/14 - 63% (Average) - 56% (Heritage) - 71% (CFG) - 71% (ACU) - 55% (FreedomWorks)

Corker (TN) - - 60% (Average) - 44% (Heritage) - 75% (CFG) - 64% (ACU) - 55% (FreedomWorks)

Blunt (MO) - 2016 - 59% (Average) - 57% (Heritage) - 67% (CFG) - 71% (ACU) - 41% (FreedomWorks)

Graham (SC) - 06/10/14 - 59% (Average) - 52% (Heritage) - 65% (CFG) - 68% (ACU) - 52% (FreedomWorks)

Chambilss (GA) - 05/20/14 - 57% (Average) - 57% (Heritage) - 61% (CFG) - 56% (ACU) - 52% (FreedomWorks)

Kirk (IL) - 2016 - 55% (Average) - 44% (Heritage) - 74% (CFG) - 44% (ACU) - 59% (FreedomWorks)

Alexander (TN) - 08/07/14 - 55% (Average) - 46% (Heritage) - 67% (CFG) - 60% (ACU) - 45% (FreedomWorks)

Isakson (GA) - 2016 - 54% (Average) - 54% (Heritage) - 59% (CFG) - 54% (ACU) - 50% (FreedomWorks)

McCain (AZ) - 2016 - 54% (Average) - 43% (Heritage) - 71% (CFG) - 52% (ACU) - 48% (FreedomWorks)

Wicker (MS) - - 54% (Average) - 46% (Heritage) - 68% (CFG) - 60% (ACU) - 41% (FreedomWorks)

Cochran (MS) - 06/03/14 - 54% (Average) - 57% (Heritage) - 56% (CFG) - 60% (ACU) - 41% (FreedomWorks)

Hoeven (ND) - 2016 - 51% (Average) - 44% (Heritage) - 58% (CFG) - 60% (ACU) - 41% (FreedomWorks)

Murkowski (AK) - 2016 - 41% (Average) - 36% (Heritage) - 52% (CFG) - 38% (ACU) - 36% (FreedomWorks)

Collins (ME) - 06/10/14 - 30% (Average) - 28% (Heritage) - 39% (CFG) - 28% (ACU) - 23% (FreedomWorks)


11 posted on 05/14/2014 8:38:33 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It's not just amnesty. It's that he is an ethnic grievance pimp just like Al Sharpton. His "in group" happens to be hispanics rather than blacks.

I won't support Rubio and I think there are a lot of folks who would agree.

12 posted on 05/14/2014 8:41:53 AM PDT by turducken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

It really rubs me the wrong way, when they talk of being against amnesty, but it’s okay to Register the illegal aliens and let them Remain in Place.

That’s just a big fat lie.

If they stay, it’s amnesty pure and simple.


13 posted on 05/14/2014 8:42:56 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Depends. He has already backtracked on it. As far as I can tell, he is more palatable than Bush, Christie, Clinton, or Biden and the record proves he is one of the more all around conservative senators. Not my first choice, but depending on how the campaign does, I might be willing to accept it if I have to. We made the mistake of trashing conservatives to pimp our preferred conservatives the last couple of times and wound up with McCain and Romney. All I am saying is we can and have done worse.


14 posted on 05/14/2014 8:45:04 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sorry, Marco, but you stepped into the Gang of 8 and you will never get that stench off your shoes.


15 posted on 05/14/2014 8:47:41 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: turducken

I will say that aside from Cruz, everyone in the potential field has irked me in one way or another. If Cruz doesn’t run or isn’t effective, I’m going to have to vote in the primary for someone that has irked me. Aside from Paul, Rubio has the most all around conservative record of the non-Cruz bunch.


16 posted on 05/14/2014 8:48:41 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears
Rubio backs amnesty—’Nuff said.

Gotta ask the question: What do you think should be done? If the answer is to deport all the illegals, I agree that it should be done.

Is there anyone here that actually believes that it would ever happen? If there is, I want some of their mood supplements for my own personal use.

Barring a mass deportation, that ain't gonna happen, what could/should be done that actually has a snowball's chance of implementation?

Pipe dreams may make one feel good, but they're useless exercises in fantasy land. Until we are able to look reality in the eye without going into a pipe-dream-induced fantasy, we will not have anyone we can rally around. There are even some yo-yos claiming Cruz is now unclean for some perceived slight.

We mock the Left for not being in touch with reality, but they have a cohesive factor that ensures their on-going success in destroying Freedom. We have fantasies.

17 posted on 05/14/2014 8:48:52 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The trouble with Rubio is that he puts his Tribe first, then America.


18 posted on 05/14/2014 8:52:37 AM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The problem with any who try to bamboozle us with the 'secure the border' mantra is exemplified in the thread below:

Immigration Enforcement Isn’t Smart, Obama Says
19 posted on 05/14/2014 8:56:41 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“I think a president has to have a clear vision of where the country needs to go and clear ideas about how to get it there,”

Wrong answer, Rubio. BHO had a clear vision and clear ideas on how to get there, and they are all WRONG. What our Nation needs is someone who has a clear vision of where the country needs to go, with an absolutely rock hard understanding of how and why this Nation was established and proceed in the same direction; one who capitalizes on the concept of rugged individualism married with the sense that we have greatness as a Nation and that we are a beacon to the rest of the world.

20 posted on 05/14/2014 9:01:18 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson