The guy having a religious background and promoting Ayn Rand’s objectionism is a contradiction to me. It would be like an IRS official promoting the Fair Tax.
Here’s a random oddity. I just noted Brat and Cantor look alike enough where they could be fraternal twins, or at least Brat could be Cantor’s stunt double in movies. (Of course, just because they look alike doesn’t mean they will vote that way) From a distance, I wouldn’t even know they changed Congressmen:
http://faculty.rmc.edu/dbrat/brat.JPG
http://media.salon.com/2010/05/gop_wants_to_cut_federal_budget_16_percent_at_a_time.jpg
http://www.breitbart.com/mediaserver/8AF4499718C4468A96D803B716611802.jpg
http://media.fresnobee.com/smedia/2014/06/06/05/27/340-KoLoI.AuSt.55.jpeg
lol...yes, I noticed that, as well; they have some physical similarities.
Not sure I know what Rand’s objectivism entails. What I took from Rand’s writing was the dangers of collectivism .....she promoted individual rights. That is not anti-religion, even though she was.
I mentioned the look a likeness to my husband tonight.
It’s a bit eerie.
Well, I was dead wrong about this not being competitive, decisive 11 point win for Brat. Looks like Cantor’s negative ads backfired (and it was wrong to paint Brat’s non-partisan service on the “Joint Advisory Board of Economists” as being a part of the Kaine Administration)
As you say, hope he’s not a Paulbot. Not to be paranoid, but unfortunately you always have to worry about that when someone sounds a libertarian note.
Safe seat, the general election is irrelevant, no matter how much the WA Post hopes their boy can win (Cantor’s body is still warm and already they are profiling the rat). That freakish moonbat, Mike Dickerson, is not on the ballot. The rat state committee selected their own college professor, Jack Trammell.
I've had the same thought a number of times over the years. Poignant point.
