Posted on 06/27/2014 6:30:13 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
I thought the attempt to embarrass Cochran with pix of his wife was about as dirty as politics gets.
I think this election shows how much better the Rats are at seeing the "long game". They have now created a great opportunity for a Rat to beat cochran. The GOPe is so concerned with keeping their perks that they get out maneuvered at every turn.
I hope Childers wins. I hope Mconnell loses. I don't really care if the Pubs as presently constituted win the Senate.
You seem to expect political campaigns to be fair. Why?
He's already on the scene! Ted Cruz, Scott Walker both come to mind.
For instance, 89% of white voters supported Romney in 2012.
If that voting bloc starts to break down, Cochran could easily lose this election.
And, the news gets worse.
The Democrat nominee for Senate is a Congressman with a moderate record:
He voted against ObamaCare.
He is pro-Life and pro-Gun.
In 2010, he was endorsed by the NRA and by “Right to Life.”
I spoke at length with John Fund at a Freeper pro-impeachment rally where he also gave a speech, way back in 1999. The gist of his speech was that all of us, himself included, should be proud to be part of the vast right wing conspiracy that was undermining the Clinton Administration's pro-statist and corrupt agenda.
He was Tea Party long before there was Tea Party.
Prospecting for Democrat votes in an open primary is a legitimate tactic. But Cochrane's campaign went over the line when it aimed racist slurs at fellow Republicans.
If you subscribe to the tea party, you've just been tarred as a racist -- by the very party you normally vote for and identify with.
There are thousands of committed, conservative blacks who have been working to improve the image of the party among blacks. And this particular campaign tactic cut the legs right out from under them.
The fact of the matter is that the GOP-e's campaign tactics did more damage to the Republican brand than it did good for the Cochrane campaign.
The Democrats had Weekend-at-Lautenberg's vote in their pocket for many years after his mind left for that great socialist utopia in the sky.
That's the model the GOP is copying with Cochran. They'll stick a battery up his butt if his heart stops.
"Meanwhile, Bishop Ronnie Crudup, Sr. of the New Horizon Church in Jackson is affiliated with a super PAC called "All Citizens For Mississippi" that has run advertisements and distributed pro-Cochran fliers. The newly-formed PAC shares an address and chief financial officer with the church, raising questions about whether the church is illegally participating in the campaign."
From the story in my post; There is money from this church PAC as well. Thew difference is, they are straightforward about what they wanted to do - get Democrats from their churches to vote for Cochran (which is illegal, but hey; there Demorats and get away with it!).
Sorry, it’s the 3rd paragraph.
Thanks for that link. Great stuff!
Oh well then that makes it all ok.
That might be true if you figure the Barbour camp as democrats.
pfony1 wrote:
<<
I thought the attempt to embarrass Cochran with pix of his wife was about as dirty as politics gets.
>>
************************************************************
Can you point to any evidence that Chris McDaniel was behind that?
By the way, there are breaking news reports that the man who took pictures of Cochran’s wife inside the nursing home is now dead (suspected suicide). Do you think McDaniel is responsible for that too?
Democrats will put that out for us... they’re not loyal to Cochran...
First rodeo?
No.
I’ve been around long enough to know that fighting an entrenched big-spender like Cochran requires a strong candidate.
As I research more, I'm finding out Barbour's brother had a lot to do with it. So I'm back at square one - Demorats in line with RINO's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.