Posted on 06/27/2014 3:25:47 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
Lois Lerner has no records of two years of missing emails and Republican claims that she’s hiding something are “silly,” her lawyer said in his first interview since the controversy around the former IRS official erupted two weeks ago.
“She doesn’t know what happened,” lawyer William Taylor III said of the 2011 computer crash that erased two years worth of Lerner’s correspondence. “It’s a little brazen to think she did this on purpose.”
The IRS two weeks ago told congressional investigators probing the tea party targeting that the former head of the tax-exempt division’s emails from 2009 through mid-2011 were lost when her hard drive buckled. The time period encompasses the first year IRS agents in Cincinnati began pulling tea party applicants for a closer look.
(PHOTOS: Lois Lerner returns to the Hill)
That news revived a firestorm among Republicans in Congress, who are incredulous that technology cannot bring the emails back and accuse IRS Commissioner John Koskinen of lying. Democrats point out that no evidence suggests the computer crash was intentional and accuse Republicans of fanning flames of a dying controversy.
Lerner has been silent for more than a year, pleading the Fifth on Capitol Hill and speaking only through her lawyer episodically. The interview marks their first detailed response since the scandal was reignited and suggests Lerner’s camp is going to keep fighting.
“This is a so-called congressional investigation with no pretense of objectivity or bipartisanship,” Taylor said. “Critics of Ms. Lerner and the IRS seize indiscriminately on small pieces of fact to claim they prove scandal.”
(Also on POLITICO: Lerner sought audit of group invite to GOP senator)
The interview covered a number of questions raised in recent weeks, from claims that Lerner targeted GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley to accusations she was in cahoots with the Justice Department. Taylor also revealed that Lerner did not print official emails or have any saved on a backup computer — the former being something Republicans will seize on to say she broke record-keeping law.
Lerner’s admission at a May 2013 tax conference that the IRS had been singling out applications for tax-exempt status using terms such as “tea party,” followed by a critical inspector general report days later, set off the original storm. The groups in question were seeking status as a social welfare organization, or a 501(c)(4) that is allowed to engage in a limited amount of political activity.
Here are her lawyer’s answers to top questions:
The computer crash.
It was an accident, said Taylor, a founding partner of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP: “She didn’t have anything to do with the destruction of her computer.”
Lerner came to work one day in late spring 2011 and was surprised to flick on her computer to find a “blue screen,” he said. He said she tried to get it fixed since her practice of archiving was to simply save things on her computer. Democrats have released emails showing Lerner contacting the IRS IT department to show she tried to resolve the problem.
She never backed them up on a USB or separate hard drive, he said, ruling out a line of questioning posed by House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) about whether Lerner could have the emails stored elsewhere on a portable device.
Republicans say it’s no coincidence that just 10 days before the crash, Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) had sent his first letter to the IRS about 501(c)(4) political activities and donors.
Oversight Republicans this week interrogated Koskinen about whether the agency at the time of the crash reached into its stash of six-month backup tapes to restore the emails. Koskinen said he wasn’t aware if they tried.
Taylor didn’t know about that option either, saying Lerner simply filled out an IT ticket “like any other IRS employee” with a problem, and when they told her they couldn’t salvage the hard drive and mentioned a more “expensive” alternative, she gave them the green light to pursue that option, he said.
“She requested that IT use every possible resource. Unfortunately, the sophisticated alternative was not able to retrieve the contents of her hard drive,” he said.
Koskinen this week said that the IRS even sent Lerner’s computer to its criminal investigators, who were also unable to get anything back.
The Grassley invite referral.
Responding to recent Ways and Means GOP allegations that Lerner tried to sic an IRS audit on Grassley, Taylor said they were mistaken and Lerner was simply suggesting a referral for the group, not the Iowa lawmaker.
“You don’t refer people to the exempt organizations division,” he said, calling the accusations “false” and “irresponsible” on Ways and Means’ part.
Lerner and Grassley were invited to speak at the same event in winter 2012, but their invitations were swapped by accident. Lerner recalls that the topic was on 501(c)(4) and the conference was at a “nice resort,” her lawyer said.
The unnamed group offered to pay for Grassley’s wife to accompany him, something Lerner thought may have been improper. Her colleagues said it wasn’t and it appears she dropped it after that.
Taylor said Lerner, who is not currently working but filling her free time gardening and volunteering, had nothing against Grassley.
In most of her criticized email correspondence released thus far from GOP investigators, Lerner has referred to scrutinizing conservative groups, like Crossroads GPS, while at the same time joking with colleagues that she wanted to work for the pro-Obama group Organizing for America.
But while Republicans say that shows Lerner was a mouthpiece for the White House, Taylor says it was natural for her division to look at conservative groups in 2010 because their numbers were on the rise.
“After Citizens United, groups identifying themselves with the tea party and other, more conservative causes dramatically increased the number of applications for (c)(4) status,” he said, referring to the landmark Supreme Court ruling that significantly loosened restrictions on political spending.
He said it was simply the job of Lerner and the IRS to ensure such tax-exempt organizations follow the law, which bars them from using more than about half of their resources engaging in politics.
For Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp “to say the IRS is looking at political activity is like [Captain Renault] saying he’s shocked there’s gambling going on in ‘Casablanca,’” he said.
When POLITICO asked Taylor if Lerner was able to give an example where she expressed concern over a liberal group or lawmaker, he did not offer one.
‘Cahoots’ with DOJ.
Taylor also responded to Oversight GOP reports that Lerner and Justice officials met in the fall of 2010 when Justice was considering the possibility of prosecuting 501(c)(4)s that may have been breaking rules by overly engaging in political activities — details Republicans found in emails handed over by the Justice Department.
Again, he said she was just doing her job.
“We should hope the two are talking to each other,” he said, because Justice and the IRS both bring tax charges and should be on the same page, he said.
Emails summarizing the meeting also show that Lerner apparently expressed skepticism that the (c)(4) issues were a criminal, rather than a civil, matter.
Oversight GOP has also hit Lerner for giving 1.1 million pages of tax return data about 501(c)(4) organizations to the FBI just before the 2010 midterms — 33 tax returns that included unlawfully disclosed private taxpayer information.
Taylor said Lerner didn’t know and sent them because Justice requested the documents: “She [understood] the donor information on Schedule B had been removed. In some cases, we later learned, it may not have been.”
The IRS has acknowledged that the 33 returns were not scrubbed of taxpayer information as required by law.
Printing ‘official’ emails — or not.
Taylor said Lerner did not print out official records she may have sent over email because she didn’t know she had to.
The Federal Records Act requires agencies to back up all “business” correspondence — anything dealing with policy or operations, for instance. And while the IRS says it’s up to employees to print off hard copies of official emails and file them, Taylor said Lerner did not because she “did not think it was required.”
National Archives, which oversees the law, and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration are currently probing the lost emails and the backup policies. The Archivist has already said the IRS did not follow the law because it did not alert them to lost emails that could be important, which is required.
Republicans this week argued that Lerner should have printed many of her emails because, as head of an entire IRS division, much of her correspondence would be “official.”
But Taylor retorts that such responsibility would have fallen on her assistants or the IRS.
“If somebody is supposed to keep archived copies, that’s the IT department’s or her staff’s responsibility,” he said. “If she didn’t [print] something, it wasn’t because she tried to conceal anything. … There should have been [IRS] backup.”
if brazen means reasonable, then yes.
Why a lying sack of yak dung. The stinky, steamy runny kind.
Lois knows “brazen.” She specializes in it, she’s experienced, she knows how to get away with it—so far, anyway.
If she’s not hiding anything, why did she plead the 5th? Was that ‘silly’?
Too bad we can’t send Jack Bauer to have a chat w/ Louis. He could start by shooting her in the knee, then move on to the russian rag down the throat move.
if brazen means reasonable, then yes.
In this context I think it means obvious.
We don’t think “she” did it .....ALONE. She may not know what happened to the emails but I think she has a clue. She’s gulty and just mad as hell that she got caught. You have to keep your eye on the ball to catch the deception and wordplay that her and her kind use to lie without conscience.
Maybe it's because she had that sappy smirk on her face when she took the 5th.
STFU! Unless it's "Guilty, your Honor."
There are hundreds of IT people here at Free Republic.
Wouldn’t those email messages be stored on the government email server?
This reads like satire.
Someone in “authority” should send this arrogant, self-important, liar criminal to prison for a long time. What a subhuman waste she is.
Sleep Deprivation. No? Move on to Water-boarding. No? Move on to the Stockade and forced feeding for a couple of days in extreme weather. Still no? Move on to Tar and Feathering. Still no, huh? Get 10 rifles, 9 blanks, 1 live round.
Lerner just screwed herself royally with these statements. You can’t invoke the Fifth and then selectively respond.
Lois Lerner fights back AS WE FIGHT BACK WAVES OF NAUSEA ALTERNATING WITH FITS OF LAUGHTER!
FIXED IT!
>> “It’s a little brazen to think she did this on purpose.”
Hahahahah! It’s a little brazen to expect anyone to believe that only very particular emails were “lost”.
Then there’s this:
“What makes the Z-Street case unique and potentially extremely damaging is that its lawsuit was filed in August 2010. That filing placed the IRS under legal obligation to preserve records.”
http://americanthinker.com/blog/2014/06/the_sleeper_case_that_could_bust_open_the_irs_scandals.html
Boom!
She’ll be HAILED as a HERO in her LEFT LEANIONG CIRCLES and SYNAGOES!!! ....SAD......My Jewish in Laws are ALSO MARXISTS And SOCIALISTS and OBAMA supporters and HATERS of ALL THING TEA PARTY and CHRISTIAN!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.