Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police: Dad sent nude photos while boy sat in car
Kentucky.com ^ | 7/3/14 | Kate Brumback

Posted on 07/03/2014 12:52:33 PM PDT by Oliviaforever

MARIETTA, GA. — A Georgia man who police say intentionally killed his toddler son by leaving the boy inside a hot SUV was exchanging nude photos with women the day his son died and had looked at websites that advocated against having children, a detective testified Thursday.

Cobb County Police Detective Phil Stoddard testified at a hearing that evidence showed Justin Ross Harris was practically leading a double life and should not be granted bond. Stoddard described the evidence police have suggesting Harris, who is charged with murder, killed his 22-month-old son Cooper intentionally.

Harris and his wife had two life insurance policies for the toddler, one for $2,000 and one for $25,000. Furthermore, Harris' wife had become unhappy with her husband's spending habits, Stoddard said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: justinrossharris
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2014 12:52:33 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

Rut Roh.These to wackos will soon fry.


2 posted on 07/03/2014 12:55:20 PM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

I have not heard about the mother, what is the story on her?


3 posted on 07/03/2014 12:58:53 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

Will the death penalty be applicable here should charges be filed?


4 posted on 07/03/2014 12:58:54 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/kentucky-1


5 posted on 07/03/2014 1:09:42 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Please Support Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Oh no...this is where he needs to spend the rest of his life...

 photo hotbox_zps8e106a6c.png

6 posted on 07/03/2014 1:11:51 PM PDT by Malichi (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

3:09 p.m. ET: Harris’ wife “is still attentive during this questioning. She is also chewing gum.” — HLN producer Natisha Lance


7 posted on 07/03/2014 1:15:14 PM PDT by Chad_the_Impaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

She’s supposedly in on it too.


8 posted on 07/03/2014 1:16:08 PM PDT by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8
I believe the mother is in on it. She showed up at the daycare place to pick up her son. They told her that her son never got dropped off. She immediately assumed that her husband had left her son in the car. They tried to tell her that there were a hundred things that could have happened, but she insisted that he left the son in the car. Mom had also conducted internet searches to find out about deaths in hot cars.

My question here is whether the daycare center tried to contact her that morning to report that her son never got dropped off.

9 posted on 07/03/2014 1:16:44 PM PDT by Hoodat (Proverbs 29:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

They could have given the toddler up for adoption. BASTARDS! They should feel the full force of the law......................


10 posted on 07/03/2014 1:18:05 PM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,752 threads and 85,005 replies. ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad_the_Impaler; b4its2late

I wonder how long she sticks to her story now that she’s discovered how her husband was sexting other women while at work that day.


11 posted on 07/03/2014 1:18:34 PM PDT by Hoodat (Proverbs 29:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chad_the_Impaler

Nice to see that she can do two things at the same time.


12 posted on 07/03/2014 1:19:34 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Please Support Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

Fox News reported that he went out to his car at lunchtime...presumably to check on the child and see if he was dead yet.


13 posted on 07/03/2014 1:23:25 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

Not so sure. I’ve been watching the hearing and my opinion changed a lot on the defense questions. The lead case detective said a lot of things he used his position and demeanor to bolster.

On defense he was argumentative and arrogant and his deductions on a lot of things are what I’d call a bias. He is basing his whole case on the husbands online sexting

They, Cobb County first filed 1st degree child abuse, then 2nd degree and when the case lead latched onto the sexting they went to murder. Finally my impression of the detective is that he was unbelievably specific when it suited him but combative and Talking over the defense lawyer and fell back on no details because he hasn’t had time to review the tons of evidence.

At this point I’m not convinced of premeditated murder


14 posted on 07/03/2014 1:25:10 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

I’m thinking that the wife was in on it with him — she goes the whole day without ever calling hubby and asking him if he dropped their toddler off okay.

And the daycare??? Nobody called the daycare — all day???


15 posted on 07/03/2014 1:26:59 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Poor child never had a chance, the media has not said hardly anything about the mother. Sounds like both parents need to be strapped in a hot car.


16 posted on 07/03/2014 1:28:28 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

My bad. Somehow I thought this was in KY.


17 posted on 07/03/2014 1:41:29 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Please Support Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
the media tends to explode wild allegations so I hate to jump on THEIR bandwagon, but it sure does look bad....

I can completely understand a frantic parent making a mistake, but going into bars, or casinos or strip joints or texting naked pics are not mistakes....its deliberate negligence...

18 posted on 07/03/2014 1:43:04 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

who wants to see that naked?
people are so strange.


19 posted on 07/03/2014 1:45:56 PM PDT by ronniesgal (Good Grief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

Murder One!


20 posted on 07/03/2014 1:47:00 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malichi
That picture looks like it's from Bridge On The River Kwai.
21 posted on 07/03/2014 1:48:06 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Here from the Daily Mail:

Investigators told the court that when Leanna Harris met her husband at the police station she asked:

‘Did you say too much?’


22 posted on 07/03/2014 1:48:49 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Malichi

My husband, being of Irish descent and quite an expert on the issue of revenge, has several ideas for what should be done with this monster.


23 posted on 07/03/2014 1:54:07 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ronniesgal

“who wants to see that naked?
people are so strange.”

Some people are strange AND wicked. Probably what turned some of them on even more was the texts describing what he was up to.


24 posted on 07/03/2014 1:54:35 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

At this point I’m not convinced of premeditated murder


Two life insurance policies out on YOUR BABY????? Who the hell does that???

I would have taken that baby. Along with a hundred thousand other families. Anyone to do that to a child — and what, at lunch the child still had a pulse so he went back to work for more sexting??

Hell is about five levels too good for this monster.


25 posted on 07/03/2014 2:00:08 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

I’d love to be on the jury that will hear this case (assuming he doesn’t reach some sort of plea bargain). We’d set a new record for “fastest guilty verdict.”


26 posted on 07/03/2014 2:00:09 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Stoddard said Harris' wife came to the day care the afternoon the boy died, June 18, and was told the child wasn't there.

According to witnesses, she then said her husband must have left the toddler in the car.

Now why would her mind go immediately to that???

27 posted on 07/03/2014 2:04:20 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

I watched all today’s testimony. The policies are, along with, “financial difficulties” are motives according to the detective. What isn’t written in the newspapers is one was through his work and $2k Many companies have free policies as a benefit. That said they did buy $25k. I bought $20K for all my kids.

More disturbing is the detectives TESTIMONY for prosecution they said the couple had “financial difficulties”. On cross his TESTIMONY was shown to be without merit. No bank statements no collections NOTHING. ONLY THE DETECTIVE INTENTIONALLY MISINTERPRETING A QUESTION ABOUT “financial difficulty” to the wife and her answer “ no more than any other couple” as verified financial difficulty. He was ridiculous and combatively equivocating.

This tells me the detective and CCPD developed the theory and have only presented real evidence and putting of anything they can’t or won’t answer with “we have not reviewed all the evidence”

There is a lot more wrong with the case I saw. It will all come out after full discovery. I predict they won’t make premeditated felony murder stick


28 posted on 07/03/2014 2:17:20 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They wouldn’t have gotten the insurance money. Of course, it wouldn’t take Edward G. Robinson to see through this insurance scam...


29 posted on 07/03/2014 2:19:52 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

They should get the maximum sentence allowed by the law of their state. This is disgusting. They are animals....no lower than animals.....................


30 posted on 07/03/2014 2:25:46 PM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,752 threads and 85,005 replies. ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

My kids are 6, 5, 3, and 20 months...I had to hug each of them after hearing about this story. How anyone could make to suffer such a innocent gift from God is beyond my ability to comprehend. Pure evil is all I can come up with. Give them both the death penalty if indeed they were both in on it.


31 posted on 07/03/2014 2:41:35 PM PDT by The Unknown Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad_the_Impaler

Hillbillies and CRIMINALS chew gum....re BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!!


32 posted on 07/03/2014 3:46:11 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Get real.....they will and SHOULD FRY!!


33 posted on 07/03/2014 3:49:00 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Did you watch the entire hearing?


34 posted on 07/03/2014 4:07:41 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Apparently the day care center sent an email out around 1 PM inquiring about the child.


35 posted on 07/03/2014 4:13:34 PM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist (Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Do you have kids?

I have 2 little ones. I would never in a million years accidentally leave one in the car. Absolutely impossible.

Searching for how long it takes for an animal to die in a hot car? Searching how to survive prison? The mother immediately assuming the dad left him in the car when she went to pick the boy up?

100% guilty.


36 posted on 07/03/2014 4:16:28 PM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist (Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m not aware of any animals that purposely leave their young to roast in hot cars.

This is what PEOPLE do.


37 posted on 07/03/2014 4:21:10 PM PDT by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Well that quote is gonna come back around in trial for sure.


38 posted on 07/03/2014 4:24:52 PM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

From same article....

On Thursday it emerged he had also done an internet search for ‘how to survive in prison’ before the toddler’s death

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2679782/Father-left-toddler-die-sweltering-SUV.html


39 posted on 07/03/2014 4:29:25 PM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist

I’ll ask you too. Did you watch the entire hearing?

Yes I have two. Both living. 30 and 38. If that makes any difference to the evidence (a lot of hearsay today and insinuations) in this case.


40 posted on 07/03/2014 4:29:32 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

These two win the award for worst humans in the United States.


41 posted on 07/03/2014 4:32:13 PM PDT by GOPJ (Why no outrage over IRS targeting? Same reason Pravda didn't make a stink about gulags.FREnterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever
They two men later took Harris to his car so he could put a couple of light bulbs he had purchased inside. Kilgore, the defense attorney, said that showed Harris did not mean to leave the boy there. 'If that were the case, why in the world would he bring his colleagues right up to the car?' he asked. Kilgore said Harris had also sent his wife a text that afternoon asking, 'When are you going to pick up my buddy?' Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2679782/Father-left-toddler-die-sweltering-SUV.html#ixzz36S3XNbZ1

Working up an alibi it looks like.....
42 posted on 07/03/2014 4:34:35 PM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

He should have just cut off his balls. No worries about kids.

Since that’s too little, too late. Fry the SOB!


43 posted on 07/03/2014 4:42:41 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

It was not a trial, but a hearing. The Magistrate thought the evidence presented was strong enough to send it to Superior Court and deny bond. Was this a poor decision?


44 posted on 07/03/2014 5:40:49 PM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist (Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist

I never said it was a trial. I said HEARING but it was still TESTIMONY before a judge. I watched all of it real time and I mainly was unconvinced by much of the detectives testimony. I do not disagree with binding over for trial but if the prosecution doesn’t do better than the lead detective they just may not get the win on the murder charge.


45 posted on 07/03/2014 5:51:02 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
the fact that they both had went to sites that talked about "no children" and "children left in hot cars" though could be the hammer in this case..

...I agree that everybody has financial difficulties..

..I agree that a $25,000 life insurance on a baby was probably very cheap and the come ons are that you buy it when the baby is little and they get to have it cheaply up until adulthood...we've all seen the ads...

46 posted on 07/03/2014 6:57:42 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wonkowasright

yep....that sounds like an alibi in the making.....


47 posted on 07/03/2014 6:59:27 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cherry

I can see your arguments about searches, etc. When asked about the specifics of them, the detective was deliberately evasive in providing them. From what website, what search engine, etc. He wouldn’t even give specific dates.

What’s going on here is that the police and District Attorney have been giving selected news organizations details that they didn’t even substantiate in the hearing. They are running a background ‘trial’ in the newspapers. They only presented as much unsubstantiated ‘evidence’ (i.e., testimony of this detective) as they could get away with. Concurrently, the D.A. beat the sexting thing to death yet provided no substantive link from it to the actual premeditation. The would not give up specifics because the evidence presented in the hearing could not be used in the trial. Ergo, just the testimony of the detective which to me was evasive and combative when questioned by the defense. In essence, he refused to concede even the smallest point where he was caught in a discrepancy.

You have a lot of conflicting stories here. The ‘officers’ at the scene supposedly said the defendant was unemotional, yet the defense put up a witness that completely debunked that. “The defendant SHOULD have known the child was in the car when he was driving....” Yet, when asked by defense, he was not even aware that the defendant is completely deaf in his right ear - the one closest to the child in the seat.

I am not saying this guy is innocent. I watched all of the televised live hearing, and what I came away with is a police detective who could not, would not give specifically definitive answers. By demeanor, design or tactic for fear of divulging specific evidence that could not be later used, this hearing gave me the impression CCPD and CCDA were only out for the publicity and the win, and they had to do this without presenting any evidence. They got what they were after.

We shall see what happens in the trial when the defense has full access to the evidence and the prosecution has to provide evidence of their claims that is not talked-over hearsay.


48 posted on 07/04/2014 2:38:42 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

No, just a part of it.


49 posted on 07/04/2014 3:37:52 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Thanks. I understand the terrible thing that happened. Initially felt like many here express. After watching the whole thing, I still have the same emotion about the child, I just don’t see everything as clear cut as the prosecution has selectively leaked to the press about before this hearing. Maybe all of it will become clearly evident as the process continues. Perhaps Detective Stoddard can be compelled to be directly responsive with some evidence and not just limited and selective remembrances of hearsay he’s collected.


50 posted on 07/04/2014 3:44:31 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson