Posted on 07/07/2014 5:19:28 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
The Senate overwhelmingly advanced a bipartisan hunting and fishing bill on Monday – but not before facing objections from liberals who criticized the chamber for failing to act on gun-control measures.
Senators voted 82-12 Monday evening to move forward on the sportsmen’s legislation, which would boost hunters and anglers through an array of provisions such as helping to build shooting ranges and loosening federal regulations on lead fishing tackle and bullets.
The package is a political boon to the host of red-state Democrats up for reelection this year including the bill’s chief Democratic sponsor, North Carolina Sen. Kay Hagan. Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska is the bill’s main Republican author.
But shortly before the procedural vote Monday, two Democratic senators stood up to announce that they could not vote to advance the legislation in light of congressional inaction on gun control.
(PHOTOS: Politicians with guns)
“I won’t be voting for cloture today because we are long overdue to make a statement in the United States Senate about the tens of thousands of deaths happening due to guns all across the country,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said. “Everyone has a role to play in trying to stem this epidemic of violence.”
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) also said he would not support cloture. Both senators represent Connecticut, where a gunman killed 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown in December 2012.
“I can’t vote for a measure that makes owning or possessing or using guns more readily or easily usable when we have failed to act and we have failed to act on commonsense, sensible measures that will stop gun violence,” Blumenthal said.
In a brief interview, Blumenthal said he plans to offer gun control amendments to the legislation, including a measure that would ban individuals under a temporary restraining order to buy or own firearms.
The underlying legislation drew opposition Monday from other liberals in the Senate, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.)
Still, Hagan and Murkowski’s legislation has much support on both sides of the aisle. Other 2014 Democrats who are co-sponsoring the legislation include Sens. Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Mark Begich of Alaska, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Mark Udall of Colorado, Mark Warner of Virginia, John Walsh of Montana, and Al Franken of Minnesota.
There could be other obstacles in the way of the sportsmen’s bill. One bill after another in the Senate this year – such as energy-efficiency legislation and a collection of tax extenders – have collapsed before final passage as Democrats and Republicans stayed mired in a dispute over amendments.
The sportsmen’s legislation could face a similar fate.
I'm ok with that.
Where I have problems is when the bastards agree.
/johnny
bastards agreeing ==
I smell a trap.
Yeah, it's a trap.
/johnny
Amendments -
They are liable to turn the bill 180 degrees.
No lead, extreme background checks and ‘mental’ restrictions,
feel the pain for fish, etc.
BUT it will STILL be Bipartisan!
Love that Bipartisan.
{Maybe I should change my name to Bipartisan, and run for office — ?)
“We have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it!”/s
“I won’t be voting for cloture today because we are long overdue to make a statement in the United States Senate about the tens of thousands of deaths happening due to guns all across the country,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said. “Everyone has a role to play in trying to stem this epidemic of violence.”
HUH? Did I miss a major news story? Tens of thousands?
Idiot
Cruz, Paul, and Lee will attempt to add amendment to get something positive, but it looks unlikely. From GOA about this bill:
“But the bill’s not about substance. It’s about reelecting its anti-gun sponsors — virtually all of them red-state Democrats who face tough reelection battles in pro-gun states. This, incidentally, is the same bill that was used to reelect Montana’s Jon Tester (D). And, although he pretended to be “pro-gun” before the election, after the election, Tester was the Second Amendment’s worst enemy.
The good news is this: Senators Mike Lee (R-UT), Rand Paul (R-KY) and Ted Cruz (R-TX) are prepared to offer genuine pro-gun amendments to this bill — like defunding Operation Choke Point and more.
But here’s the problem: Anti-gun Senator Harry Reid will try to use a procedural tactic called an “amendment tree” to block Lee, Paul, and Cruz from offering any pro-gun amendments.”
Senate Republican leadership will help Reid right along, if history is any guide.
/johnny
“Democrats and Republicans stayed mired in a dispute over amendments. “
LOL!
Harry won’t allow any amendments or meaningful debate in “the world’s greatest deliberative body”. Well, it had been called that before Harry took control.
POLITICO will cover up anything the Dems want them to. Anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.