Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry on Hannity Now
Fox | July 9, 2014 | Vanity

Posted on 07/09/2014 7:18:35 PM PDT by yetidog

Perry on Hannity. Good interview; Perry is strong..


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: interview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2014 7:18:35 PM PDT by yetidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yetidog

If Perry was truly strong he would act like a man and call up the National Guard to patrol and seal the Texas border from an invasion of disease ridden parasites.


2 posted on 07/09/2014 7:23:54 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

I like Perry. He gave a great interview. However, he lost a golden opportunity today. He should have held his own press,conference after the president’s press conference. He would have looked and sounded much more presidential than Obama. I think the contract would have been eye opening for many people.


3 posted on 07/09/2014 7:25:35 PM PDT by wewereright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Why doesn’t he call up the National Guard? Unfortunately we know why CA doesn’t.


4 posted on 07/09/2014 7:27:52 PM PDT by Aria ( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

I agree. Perry sounded and looked presidential. He made Obama look like a community organizer -— and not a good one at that. All Obama did in his presser was whine.


5 posted on 07/09/2014 7:29:18 PM PDT by varina davis (Gov. Rick Perry in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
Governors cannot unilaterally call up the National Guard for reasons associated with an exigency beyond state borders. Likewise, were a governor do so and was overruled by the President (whose authority has higher standing) significant
embarrassment (or something like it) would surely follow.
6 posted on 07/09/2014 7:31:13 PM PDT by yetidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

Mark Levin is next.


7 posted on 07/09/2014 7:33:47 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather (Yuri Bezmenov (KGB Defector) - "Kick The Communists Out of Your Govt. & Don't Accept Their Goodies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yetidog
U.S. Const. art. IV, § 4 mandates the Federal government protect states against Invasion. The Federal government has not performed.

U.S. Const. art. I, § 10 No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

U.S. Const. amend. X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

All States retain the right to self defense. The Federal government has refused to provide for the common defense, the raison d'etre for the Federal government. The States must repel invasion or the people will.


Texas

The Texas Governor has the authority to call forth the state military forces and the reserve militia to repel the invasion.

Tex. Gov. Code Sec. 431.071
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/GV/htm/GV.431.htm#431.071

Tex. Gov. Code Sec. 431.001
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/GV/htm/GV.431.htm#431.001

Tex. Const. art. 4, § 7
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CN/htm/CN.4.htm#4.7


Arizona

The Arizona Governor has the authority to proclaim an emergency and mobilize all or any part of the state guard or the unorganized militia into service of the state.

Ariz. Const. art. 5, § 3
http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/const/5/3.htm

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 26-174.
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/26/00174.htm&Title=26&DocType=ARS

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 26-122.
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/26/00122.htm&Title=26&DocType=ARS

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 26-121.
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/26/00121.htm&Title=26&DocType=ARS

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 26-172.
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/26/00172.htm&Title=26&DocType=ARS

N.B. Unlike Arizona SB-1070, these do not pertain to immigration but to a proclamation of an emergency and the protection of lives or property.



There is no reason for Governors to stand by idly when the law supports States 100% and the Federals violate law.
8 posted on 07/09/2014 7:34:06 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

But he can call up state guard


9 posted on 07/09/2014 7:35:18 PM PDT by john316 (JOSHUA 24:15 ...choose you this day whom ye will serve...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yetidog
The federal executive has no authority to alter a state constitution.

The federal executive has no authority over the Texas State Guard.

The federal executive has no authority over the Texas reserve militia.

The federal executive does have authority over the Texas Army National Guard and the Texas Air National Guard only when they are called into actual service of the United States. At all other times the Governor is the Commander in Chief of these forces.

10 posted on 07/09/2014 7:35:35 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

Levin on now.

Good stuff.


11 posted on 07/09/2014 7:41:05 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

He can declare a state of emergency and call up the Guard.

Obama could sue, but he wouldn’t. He could attempt to over ride Perry, but Perry could refuse based on the rights of his sovereign state. Obama has not nationalized the guard. It remains under the control of the Governor. That would then require Obama to sue in the Federal Court. and we know how long that takes. Obama will be out if it ever gets to the SCOTUS.

Perry takes the same oath to defend his state as the POTUS does to defend this country.

Lawlessness beget lawlessness. You reap what you sow!

It is time SOMEONE stood up to this Mulatto Moron and his tyranny!


12 posted on 07/09/2014 7:41:35 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

Governors cannot unilaterally call up the National Guard for reasons associated with an exigency beyond state borders. Likewise, were a governor do so and was overruled by the President (whose authority has higher standing) significant
embarrassment (or something like it) would surely follow.


Perry can also refuse the Presidents authority.

We have a crisis and the President is not acting in the interests of the U.S.

The stand off would obviously create a constitutional crisis, but Perry has the support of the American people


13 posted on 07/09/2014 7:42:20 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yetidog
Here's something interesting about the National Guard I found on Wikipedia. Doesn't this imply that the President can issue orders to the Guard only if Congress approves?

The National Defense Authorization Act 2008

Repeals provisions in section 1076 but still enables the President to call up the National Guard of the United States for active federal military service during Congressionally sanctioned national emergency or war.

14 posted on 07/09/2014 7:42:54 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Levin kicked butt!


15 posted on 07/09/2014 7:43:30 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather (Yuri Bezmenov (KGB Defector) - "Kick The Communists Out of Your Govt. & Don't Accept Their Goodies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Impeach the basturd.


16 posted on 07/09/2014 7:46:38 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
The federal executive does have authority over the Texas Army National Guard and the Texas Air National Guard only when they are called into actual service of the United States.

Yes, but who can call the Guard into federal service? I think a law from 2008 said that only Congress can do so. Am I right?

17 posted on 07/09/2014 7:51:56 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

Perry is RINO. I am from Texas. Please find me a CONSERVATIVE who is from Texas that supports Perry. There ARE NONE. That’s why he’s not running. He would have LOST the Governor’s race. FACT.


18 posted on 07/09/2014 7:55:53 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

When not in federal service the Governor is Commander-in-Chief

“He shall be Commander-in-Chief of the military forces of the State, except when they are called into actual service of the United States. He shall have power to call forth the militia to execute the laws of the State, to suppress insurrections, and to repel invasions.” - Tex. Const. art. 4, § 7 http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CN/htm/CN.4.htm#4.7


19 posted on 07/09/2014 7:57:05 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Yup.


20 posted on 07/09/2014 8:11:40 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson