Posted on 07/10/2014 8:38:40 AM PDT by PoloSec
Only slightly worse!
I am wondering if the Supreme Court did not rule that way in order to foment all this war on women crap before the election. The media is doing its part by not differentiating between contraception and abortifacients.
It’s truly strange times we find ourselves in isn’t it?
The very thought that someone could suggest that it’s the employers’ *responsibility*, not just perk, but *responsibility* to provide any and all forms of birth control to their female employees, is ludicrous. Not even 20 years ago this thought never would have crossed any pol’s mind as a possible campaign strategy.
But here we are today. This society has become so perverse in its values and so crippled in its ability to critically think, I don’t know if we can ever come back.
Health *benefits* from an employer are just that *benefits*. They aren’t “rights”. Sheesh!!! They are part of a *compensation package*. They are part of one’s salary!
The following is a perfect example of this inanity: “My employer won’t buy my lunch at my lunch break. He’s denying me access to food”.
It’s outrageous, fallacious and dangerous to be even entertaining this tom foolish buggery!
What’s next, people are going to start saying, “How dare employers deny people access to money”?
Becaise that’s *exactly* how ludicrous this notion is, for the exact same reason!!!
That’s lame. It’s not like the GOP finally hired Eminem for campaign songs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.