Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Administration Seeks End to Tax Inversion Deals: To halt rush of U.S. companies moving abroad.
New York Times ^ | 07/16/2014 | David Gelles

Posted on 07/16/2014 1:29:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The Obama administration has urged congressional leaders to take swift action to halt the rush of United States companies moving abroad.

In letters sent to four lawmakers, Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew said the administration supported a quick fix that would halt the trend of so-called inversions, in which United States companies buy a smaller competitor and reincorporate overseas to save money on taxes.

Speaking at the CNBC Delivering Alpha conference on Wednesday, Mr. Lew called for legislation that would include a package of business reforms, one of which would bring tax levels of companies in the 20 percent range.

“The best way to deal with this is through comprehensive business tax reform and we have a plan out there that would accomplish multiple goals,” he said, citing business tax reforms and providing resources for infrastructure investments.

Members of the House and Senate have made proposals to curb the inversion trend in recent months, and the president included a provision in the budget he presented to Congress this year that would have effectively banned the move. But none of these efforts have yet gained traction.

Now, with the pace of inversions – and the size of companies moving abroad – increasing, the administration is urging Congress to act fast. Mr. Lew sent the letter to Representative Dave Camp, Republican of Michigan and the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee; Representative Sander Levin, Democrat of Michigan, the ranking member; Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee; and Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, the ranking member.

“Short of undertaking a comprehensive reform of the business tax system, there are concrete steps that Congress can take now that would address this urgent issue,” Mr. Lew wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at dealbook.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corporatettaxes; obama; tax; taxinversion

1 posted on 07/16/2014 1:29:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So instead of lowering the onerous burdens on business, we’ll just cut off one of the escape routes.

We are building our own Berlin wall.

Obama would rather see them shut down than move out.


2 posted on 07/16/2014 1:31:21 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why pay hundreds of millions of dollars to a government that doesn’t appreciate you and pisses the money away?


3 posted on 07/16/2014 1:32:06 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
bring tax levels of companies in the 20 percent range.

So lemme get this straight ... 0bama wants to CUT corporate taxes? I can scarcely believe it.

4 posted on 07/16/2014 1:33:05 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When you have to build walls - physical or legal - to keep people in, you are running a totalitarian state. Period.


5 posted on 07/16/2014 1:36:23 PM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

RE: So instead of lowering the onerous burdens on business, we’ll just cut off one of the escape routes.

We are building our own Berlin wall.

_________________________________

There are FReepers who would solve the problem of companies re-incorporating overseas by TARIFFS. So that it will be more difficult for them to sell their products from overseas to the USA and “encourage” them to hire Americans and make the products here.


6 posted on 07/16/2014 1:38:23 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So the way around this would be to sell out to a larger foreign company which would take a controlling interest in the merger. Watch out for the “unintended” consequences. The change could actually increase the sale of US companies to foreign buyers.


7 posted on 07/16/2014 1:38:41 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Obama doesnt want that... its just pressure from parties around him who are starting to recognize his shit, and are trying to mitigate it. The ill bred bastard’s goal is the destruction of America and all that made it strong. All the christianity, conservatism and commonsense. There are some politicians who would still like to have a future.
And then there is America.


8 posted on 07/16/2014 1:55:52 PM PDT by himno hero (hadnuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The history of higher tariffs has not been good.

Tariffs were an issue in the colonial revolt against England. Tariffs —particularly on manufactured goods needed by the South-—were a proximate cause of the American Civil War. And the disastrous Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930 brought American manufacturing to its knees when other countries retaliated, shutting down foreign markets to American goods.


9 posted on 07/16/2014 1:57:27 PM PDT by Walrus (I love the America that used to be ---I hate the America that now IS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

These marxists are dying to seize the assets of businesses. This is why they are doing this, and why they are “fining” big businesses obscene amounts.
The goal of communism is to put all the means of production in the hands of the government.


10 posted on 07/16/2014 2:00:10 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Yes, it’s a slower blood letting, so maybe they won’t notice.


11 posted on 07/16/2014 2:00:38 PM PDT by SgtHooper (This is not my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
...and the president included a provision in the budget he presented to Congress this year that would have effectively banned the move.

Just how pray tell?

12 posted on 07/16/2014 2:09:12 PM PDT by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

“The goal of communism is to put all the means of production in the hands of the government.”

First step, collective bargaining. The creation and then
recruitment of unions.
Second step, creation of a false front of opposition. The
Republican party.
Third step, control of the media. ABC,CBS,NBC,CNN,MSNBC,
AP, etc...

Actually the goal is total and absolute control over life
and death of the individual. In other words “ put us right
back in the hands of king George.


13 posted on 07/16/2014 2:14:17 PM PDT by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This all ends with barbed wire and walls.


14 posted on 07/16/2014 2:19:20 PM PDT by Fear The People (When the government fears the people, you have LIBERTY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This all ends with barbed wire and walls...

I should have added an image.

Communism has three problems...

15 posted on 07/16/2014 2:20:18 PM PDT by Fear The People (When the government fears the people, you have LIBERTY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just when you start to think that Democrats can’t possibly be any more hypocritical than they already are, here comes ‘’Cayman Islands Jack’’ — Treasury Secretary Jack Lew — to urge American businessmen to be more patriotic by keeping their investments in this country.

During Mr. Lew’s Senate hearings on his way to becoming U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, it was revealed — and not denied by Mr. Lew himself — that he not only had invested in a Cayman Islands tax shelter so that he wouldn’t have to patriotically pay taxes like the rest of us, he also oversaw tax-shelter investments as an employee of Citigroup where he advised many clients to be UNpatriotic by also using off-shore tax havens to evade the IRS.

So now, thanks to the Senate Democrats who so enthusiastically led the approval of Mr. Lew’s nomination, we now have a Treasury Secretary with zero moral authority to prevail on American businessmen to keep from moving their investments to countries where taxes are less onerous, partly because their finance ministers are not as corrupt as Mr. Lew and his Democratic enablers in Congress.


16 posted on 07/16/2014 2:22:59 PM PDT by Bluestocking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slambat
In other words “ put us right back in the hands of king George."

King George didn't desire a thousandth of the control these evil men desire. Obama and his ilk want the power of Stalin or Pol Pot. They will not be happy until they can kill, sexually violate, or otherwise destroy their fellow man on a whim.

17 posted on 07/16/2014 2:26:48 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama’s already destroyed a third of US publicly listed companies. There are still some left he can steal from.


18 posted on 07/16/2014 2:27:57 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Saw this...

Jack Lew: Decision on executive action on taxes ‘in the very near future’
http://washingtonexaminer.com/jack-lew-decision-on-executive-action-on-taxes-in-the-very-near-future/article/2552991


19 posted on 09/08/2014 10:53:49 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson