Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj
Yet it was New Hampshires electoral vote which actually made the difference in 2000. If Bush had lost NH, the entire Florida debacle would have been irrelevant.
28 posted on 08/03/2014 8:23:37 PM PDT by Radix ("..Democrats are holding a meeting today to decide whether to overturn the results of the election.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Radix

It could be said for many states. My state of Tennessee was generally given credit for that, since we had lamentably gone (by pluralities) for Clinton in ‘92 and ‘96, but it was the repudiation of Gore (which he should’ve carried had he not gone full moonbat) that cost him the whole thing. It was just 10 years earlier when he ran for reelection to the Senate in 1990 he carried every single county in TN.

I would still not consider NH to be a swing state, as that was only one time in the modern era its vote mattered. It still remains at present, to the left of the overall national vote. Voting Dem 5 out of the past 6 elections tends to prove the point.


32 posted on 08/03/2014 8:36:32 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson