Posted on 08/12/2014 3:39:23 PM PDT by bamahead
dangerous and unusual
So is a scroll saw.
The first amendment has been dead for a long time; ever since 1919:
When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.compare and contrast with:
Amendment IThere you have it; the Supreme Court has a long tradition of not caring about the Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I have too. She said the Constitution was made at a different time when people mostly hunted for food and had to fear Indian raids.
She went on a diatribe about how we need to ban all guns. I told her, I don’t agree. I then said, if you feel that strongly about this, you should get an amendment movement going to repeal the 2nd amendment. Her response was, that will never happen so we just need to keep passing stricter and stricter gun laws.
“the right the KEEP AND BEAR ARMS shall not be infringed.” The word “arms” in the 18th Century means “weapons.” It wasn’t just weapons for “self defense”, but those suitable for militia (military) duty. An AR-15 is a “weapon” suitable for “military” use. Has been since it was adopted in the 60s.
How stupid can a judge be? (rhetorically questions) In this circumstance, the “self-defense” reason for the Heller decision is distracting from the larger reason to keep and bear arms. You have that right both as an individual protection for self protection and to provide for community protection (answer the call of city, county, & state officials to perform militia duty).
For years the liberal judiciary wanted to just allow arms by “states” for their militias. Now they are forgetting that as well.
Black robed tyrants with manure for brains!
AR-15’s are dangerous and unusual? Or are judges dangerous and unusual.
Unfortunately, she's a FEDERAL judge, so her ruling could theoretically be used in other states.
I expect an vigorous appeal!
Just saying.
How long before a stay is issued by an appellate court? Weeks or a few months.
That's all there is to this story.
I did not doctor this pic, she really does look like this..
Lol. Come and take it.
Lol. Come and take it.
I was just thinking there’s too much freedom. :)
There are solutions.
Believe me, if judges that spout this sort of crap were hanged for it we'd see an overnight reform in the Judiciary.
Catherine C. Blake...an appointee of BillyBob.Looks like a female who practices an alternate lifestyle.No surprise here.
Define “unusual”...
Blake is a flake. What else can you say about somebody so stupid?
That pic looks “Dangerous and Unusual.”
MHO!
The simple comeback is that if the Constitution is locked in 1791, then the high speed printing press, television news, and and the Internet is not protected by the 1st Amendment because the founding fathers could never have envisioned them.
Carrying out Obama’said directives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.