Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChildOfThe60s

The Liberal argument against the Second Amendment always includes, so you think you should be able to own a Bazooka?

I always say yes, the Bazooka is a defensive Weapon, just like all other Firearms.

You then inform them that nearly 70% of the Cannons used by the Colonists against the British were Privately owned.

My favorite is the argument that we should only be able to own Muskets since they were the Weapons of the time the Second Amendment was penned. The correct response is, I guess that applies to Printing Presses as well.


2 posted on 08/24/2014 9:25:27 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Things can always be worse and the Democrat Party is here to prove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kickass Conservative

Up`n here mountains one of our boys sent his father a Japanese flame thrower via the US MAil in 1945. It was legal then/.

“ELIZABETHTOWN
—Frank A. Stevens has received numerous souvenirs from his son, Durand, who is a Sergeant attached to the Signal Corps in the South-west Pacific. They consist of shell and woods and money; a flame thrower; a flag; a telephone, and many other items of interest.”
‘Essex County Republican’ Mar 3, 1944, p1


4 posted on 08/24/2014 9:36:38 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson