Posted on 09/12/2014 3:31:15 PM PDT by Kaslin
I know he’s made a million mistakes. And I have opposed nearly all his domestic and international policies. But after watching Obama’s intense ISIS speech Wednesday night, and reading the text several times, I think the president basically -- finally -- got it right.
I support him. My best advice to Republicans and Democrats is to support the president’s new ISIS campaign.
Noteworthy, as of this writing, House Speaker John Boehner has announced his backing of Obama on this matter. Democratic Senate majority leader Harry Reid and Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell have also announced their support of the president’s ISIS plan. Only Nancy Pelosi is absent.
But I want to underscore the need for Republicans to get on board with this Obama plan. If not, they risk blowing what appears to be a landslide election. Opposing the president on this would look way too political, ignoring national security. It would be a huge mistake.
Here are the opening words from the president on Wednesday night. They rally support: “My fellow Americans, tonight I want to speak to you about what the United States will do with our friends and allies to degrade and ultimately destroy the terrorist group known as ISIL.”
Importantly, Obama now seems to be following the sound advice of experts such as former ambassador Ryan Crocker (who terms ISIS, “al-Qaeda Version 6.0”), General Jack Keane, the retired four-star general and former vice chief of staff of the U.S. Army, and U.S. Army general Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
Perhaps the most important point in the president’s speech was his apparent decision to bomb ISIS in Syria as well as Iraq. The presumption is that this will be done simultaneously, which is the exact advice given to him by Crocker, Keane, and Dempsey.
That’s another signal to members of the GOP. Before you go home for the congressional election break, fund Obama’s new military request and pass a resolution endorsing the simultaneous bombing of ISIS in Syria and Iraq.
Additionally, while Obama said he doesn’t want GI combat troops on the ground, he specifically endorsed the use of special-ops forces to guide enhanced bombing missions and support Iraqi and Kurdish troops with training, intelligence, and equipment.
In his speech, the president announced the deployment of an additional 475 “service members,” which can be added to the several hundred already in Iraq. In all likelihood, thousands of Special Forces will be necessary to destroy the Islamic State. Along with the bombings, there will have to be a ground war to eventually eliminate ISIS. And that will require all manner of U.S. advisors, such as ground-to-air controllers for every allied battalion. This will be tough stuff.
The president also will increase military assistance to the free Syrian opposition to Assad, which is tricky business. But former ambassador Crocker argues that this can be done with moderate Sunni forces.
And Obama stated that “we will redouble our efforts to cut off [ISIS] funding; improve our intelligence; strengthen our defenses; counter its warped ideology; and stem the flow of foreign fighters into and out of the Middle East.” And he reiterated the need to provide more humanitarian assistance.
Coalition building will not be easy, but it’s an important part of the strategy. That’s probably why President Obama said, “ISIL is not Islamic.” What he undoubtedly meant is that these are a bunch of crazy, bloodthirsty, power-hungry people who are hiding behind religious beliefs that are not shared by moderate Arab states, such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan, hopefully Turkey, certainly Kuwait, and maybe Qatar.
Significantly, Obama stated a “core principle” of his presidency: “If you threaten America, you will find no safe haven.” Well, that’s basically what President George W. Bush said when he proclaimed right after 9/11 that “You’re either with us, or against us.”
Obama never gives Bush any credit. He didn’t when his predecessor handed over a stable Iraq following the surge. And he hasn’t mentioned that Bush recommended 20,000 U.S. forces be left behind in Iraq. But at least Obama has gotten some religion in this new phase of the War on Terror.
Why his change? Well, yes, he’s getting clobbered in the polls. But I think the political narrative completely changed when America saw the horrific beheadings of American journalists Jim Foley and Steven Sotloff. Suddenly, Americans got on their hind legs and shouted, “We must not let this go unpunished.” And then came the realization that ISIS will come at us at home in a short period of time.
It took President Obama a while to figure all this out. He was leading from behind, but maybe now he’s moving toward the front. Looking ahead, the key issues will be commitment and execution.
As President Reagan used to say, “Trust but verify.”
Bush got congress approval. Why not oboma?
The plan is bad. It is the same plan that Obama used in Libya and look how that turned out.
That said, the Republicans are once again running scared and Libertarians of course agree with Obama as usual. So, if they are going to give Obama the money, they must make it clear that Obama and only Obama take responsibility or credit for the success or failure of the plan.
That's why
There we go just as I predicted.
All that's missing is a charge of “rasism” for telling the man he has bungled so many quasi military operations and shown such diplomatic incompetence and lack of strategy (not how do we get in but how and when do we get out) that we no longer trust his provably nonexistent leadership
and then there's the whole lying thing...
snort
like that has worked so far with obamacare, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, trafficking children across the border to break the immigration system, Iraq, and the US economy
for starters
What plan?
Unless there is a vote in Congress there is no “plan” because there should be no funding. This is a rogue administration violating the constitution. spit
0bumble didn’t get it right. His coalition of the “willing” is not going to provide enough trained fighters to take on a ISIS horde of 31,500 that is growing by 500 a day. Once some of our outnumbered Special Forces get surrounded, captured, and slaughtered (I pray this will not happen), there will be a demand (from the US public) for US ground troops and Nobel Peace Prize recipient, the reluctant warrior 0dumbo, will have no choice but to comply.
Support Obama’s plan? I wouldn’t support anything coming from the whole Obama/Kerry/Hagel clown squad. These are not leaders who will implement a plan for victory, to put it mildly. These are the degenerates whose idea of exerting moral authority involves flying rainbow flags from our embassies and having drag-queen performances on military bases. Heck, they can’t even muster their psyches to a point where they can express whether we’re at “war” with ISIS or trying to “manage” them.
Dingbats. Worthless, degenerate dingbats.
Kudlow was outed once and for all as a Statist back in the depths of the 2008 crash when Bernie Sanders called him out as a (fellow) Socialist for his demand for the big bank bailout. We just need bailouts now and then, y’see.
It's Not a Misnomer
Andy McCarthy, Sept. 12.
Dear Leader has a PLAN? Who knew? Has he shared it with ISIS yet so they will know what he wants them to do? Dear Leader is such a silly putz.
What plan would that be?
Obama’s ISIS “strategy” speech was strictly from hunger....a desperate attempt to save his *** in midterms.
A pure political speech........ he was whipped into submission by vote-crazed Dummycrats seeing their seats slipping away-—hanging on by their fingernails.
Obama’s “wide-eyed, earnest delivery” of the speech was a dead giveaway——straight out of “The Actor’s Workshop.”
Not even close to Gen Eisenhower rallying the troops.
Don’t be stupid, Larry.
Good catch - I was wondering about that...
Actually, he’s in a bigger pickle now than he was before he made the speech-—when he stupidly said he DIDN’T have a strategy.
Now he was force-fed a strategy-—and if anything goes “wrong” (cackle) he’s cooked his own goose AND midterm Dummycrats.
ISIS will get defunded just like ACORN got defunded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.