Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Profit or Prejudice? Race Sensitivity Creates New Marketing Risks
Townhall.com ^ | September 14, 2014 | Autry J. Pruitt

Posted on 09/14/2014 9:49:46 AM PDT by Kaslin

When Pepsi-Cola President Walter Mack recognized his company could sell more product to black Americans in the 1940s, he initiated a racially-targeted marketing effort to increase sales. It worked and the company’s market share rose dramatically in just a few years. The strategy was so successful, some inside the company were concerned it might be off-putting to white consumers, prompting Mack to declare that Pepsi would not, “become known as a n----r drink.”

This infamous racial slur, unapologetically stated in the presence of African-American ad executives, ran through my mind after reading media reports about the racist emails from Atlanta Hawks basketball team owner Bruce Levenson in 2012. For many black-owned small-business owners like myself, it sounded infuriating. Here was another rich, entitled, white man using his business as a cover to demean the black customers who fueled the resurgence of his NBA franchise, not to mention his fortune. The emails were such that Levenson was compelled to surrender ownership of his property.

But the media coverage reflects very little of Levenson’s actual correspondence. Although parts of it are uncomfortable to read, nothing struck me as racist or out of line. This was no repeat of Mack’s characterization of black Americans; Levenson’s sin was to recognize the fact that different groups of people have different levels of discretionary income to spend on pro basketball.

The team was facing a problem that many businesses face; a demographic shift in their customer base. At the time of Levenson’s email, Atlanta’s population was about 55% black and 40% white. However, roughly 75% of all disposable income rested with whites. Levenson speculated that those with the most disposable income were turning away because the games included music and other events that those people didn’t want to see.

Levenson specifically stated that his, "theory is that the black crowd scared away the whites." If you stop reading there, one could easily think that Levenson’s remarks are racist. But the next sentence gives away his heart and shows that his correspondence was all business. "Please don't get me wrong,” he wrote. “There was nothing threatening going on in an arena back then. I never felt uncomfortable, but I think southern whites simply were not comfortable being in an arena or at a bar where they were in the minority."

He went on to call characterizations of Philips Arena as dangerous or in the wrong part of town, "racist garbage,” adding that he doesn't care about the color of the artists providing entertainment during the games, just that the music needs to be familiar to 40-year-old white guys. Yes, it was uncomfortable to read and Levenson acknowledged as much writing, “This is obviously a sensitive topic, but sadly I think it is far and away the number one reason our season ticket sales are low."

Levenson’s email repeatedly called into question profits and low ticket sales and never once did he refer to the culture or team as being too black. All he wanted to do was increase sales. If anything, his email revealed his thoughts about Southern whites not what he thought should be happening. He was observing the reality on the ground.

How are Levenson’s observations any different than what Hollywood does in deciding which films to produce? You may recall director and producer George Lucas telling Jon Stewart that behind closed doors in Hollywood, it was decided that nobody wanted to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to produce a movie about the Tuskegee Airmen, featuring an all-black cast. Ticket sales could not support the film’s budget.

Take a close look at the next Apple commercial on television. How many black mothers are shown sitting with their daughters in front of that silvery smooth Apple device? Zero. This isn’t racism; it’s recognizing demographic realities. Just because someone responds to them does not make them racist.

Still not convinced? Drive through any city and flip through the radio dial. You won’t hear Nicki Minaj or Nas on the same station as Paramore or John Mellencamp. There’s a reason for that; they are marketing to different demographics. But after Levenson’s divestiture of his share of a professional sports franchise, we’re a giant step closer to the Thought Police driving fundamental marketing decisions out of the board room.

Worse yet, we’re cheapening the meaning and impact of true racism that harms society while ignoring real problems in the black community. We’d be a lot better off hearing solutions to black-on-black crime and the inequity of black incarceration rates than the forfeiture of a person’s property for having the audacity to acknowledge the economic facts of the marketplace.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: brucelevenson; marketing; politicalcorrectness; profit; race; thoughtpolice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2014 9:49:46 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The only true racism I see is the black attitude toward whites. It’s vicious, it’s hateful, it’s ubiquitous.


2 posted on 09/14/2014 9:53:11 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Harvey Dent, can we trust him?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBsdV--kLoQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

a lot of companies in the 40’s had ads directed at minorities, Pepsi was not the only one


3 posted on 09/14/2014 9:55:15 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Doesn't look racist to me.

4 posted on 09/14/2014 9:59:24 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Ad in 40's Life magazine

5 posted on 09/14/2014 10:00:53 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; a fool in paradise; Tax-chick

Um... what??


6 posted on 09/14/2014 10:02:40 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Neither does it to me.


7 posted on 09/14/2014 10:05:26 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Similar to the Pepsi scenario, McDonalds tied their image to the “low price value menu” and “hip urban” market in order to gain the incremental market share from the lower income and minority demographic. What that did was create a perception of low value and poor quality for their product that drove away the middle income and non minority customer. The straw man that Levinson has proffered is less about any guilt he may have at his emails, and more about the fact that the Hawks are a sinking ship, and having seen how much the L.A. Clippers sold for, he decided to voluntarily back away from the team and sell his share for what he could before the market reality set in on the actual value of a poor product in a below average basketball market like Atlanta.


8 posted on 09/14/2014 10:06:47 AM PDT by festusbanjo (The 2nd amendment wasn't to protect us from each other,but to protect us from tyrannical politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I don’t doubt it


9 posted on 09/14/2014 10:07:03 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I also don’t doubt it was a small portion of their ad budgets


10 posted on 09/14/2014 10:08:08 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
There was a big stink some time ago about this ad. It was supposedly "racist". I just thought it was a nice way of saying hey, black families, you are welcome at McDonald's.

We want YOUR money, too.

Plus it shows an intact, working class family.

What's so wrong about that?

11 posted on 09/14/2014 10:10:26 AM PDT by boop (I just wanted a President. But I got a rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It is not racist to say that people feel uncomfortable when they can’t racially or culturally identify with a significant percentage of a crowd. If basketball only caters to blacks with crummy music taste, that’ll be their audience.


12 posted on 09/14/2014 10:10:43 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Excellent article! Thanks for posting. This guy gets it.


13 posted on 09/14/2014 10:12:35 AM PDT by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: festusbanjo
That's an interesting point. I actually keep an eye out for ad campaigns aimed at minorities for some of the reasons you describe here.

I remember telling myself a few years ago that Toyota wasn't doing themselves any favors when they launched an ad campaign aimed at black Americans. In that particular case I don't think perception was as much a problem as reality for Toyota. It was clear to me that they had pretty much reached the peak of their market share in traditional auto sales, and their only growth opportunity lay in selling cheap, lower-quality vehicles to people with less disposable income. The quality ratings of their vehicles in the next few years pretty much confirmed this.

14 posted on 09/14/2014 10:13:41 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grania

The music played at sports events nowadays gets on my nerves. If it were up to me they would bring back old fashioned organists at baseball games. And they would turn down the decibel level quite a bit.


15 posted on 09/14/2014 10:17:53 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Whether yellow black or white, they are precious in His sight.


Been a long time since I heard that marketing ploy............


16 posted on 09/14/2014 10:18:36 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (The Bible doesn't say what I think it says and it says a lot of things I didn't know..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boop
I think the "there's no tipping" could be perceived as racist. "you don't have to get dressed up" could've been replaced with something else, or omitted. Also dinnertimin' and anytimin' and waitin' refer to a negative image of black speech patterns. These statements do reinforce stereotypes, and that's one definition of racism. Even if the stereotypes are true, it's still racist to define people by them. Why is the guy walking in black?

Yeah, the ad is pretty bad. Besides that, it would definitely discourage whites and even other minorities from going to McDonalds.

17 posted on 09/14/2014 10:20:48 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: boop

That woman had no legs??


18 posted on 09/14/2014 10:26:07 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: boop

The woman in back is not intact! Nothing below the table.


19 posted on 09/14/2014 10:27:10 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grania

lol


20 posted on 09/14/2014 10:28:48 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson