Skip to comments.
Spoiler alert: rogues could determine fate of US Senate
Yahoo News/AFP ^
| Oct 26, 2014
| Michael Mathes
Posted on 10/26/2014 11:51:47 AM PDT by Innovative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: elcid1970
Not to make too big a deal about it, but if it wasn’t for Ralph Nader taking 6% (?) of the Florida vote, we would have had President Gore. Works both ways.
61
posted on
10/26/2014 3:28:39 PM PDT
by
BruceS
To: BruceS
Well....sometimes.
Here’s a dream ticket to test your hypothesis: Hillary & Fauxcahontas square off in 2016 & the loser in the primary decides to go third party.
THAT would be a liberal catfight fit for a bucket of popcorn!
62
posted on
10/26/2014 4:37:43 PM PDT
by
elcid1970
("I am a radicalized infidel.")
To: Innovative
The RNC, GOPe, NCGOP scum all need to be held accountable after this election.
The big buck consultants that bleed the Tillis campaign dry should be parking cars at queer night clubs!
63
posted on
10/26/2014 5:02:41 PM PDT
by
rrrod
(at home in Medellin Colombia)
To: SoConPubbie
I agree, and we get rid of them in PRIMARIES.
When applying this to the current election, allowing COMMIE DEMS to remain in power would just create an political environment where in the real world, and not in theory more abortion, gay marriage, erosion of religious freedom, etc.. WILL happen because of the nomination and approval of Racial Leftwing Judges by a US Senate Controlled by HARRY REID and President OBAMA. YOU can deny this all you want and try to deflect by saying “but the Republicans approved of Judge X..” all you want, but that’s the fact a Republican Controlled Senate IS (other than an asteroid hitting Washington) the only real hope, baring divine intervention to STOP the policies you mentioned. Get your head out of the clouds and back into practical application of politics in the real world, man! No the GOP-E isn’t good, but WE CAN and WILL beat them in internal battles ;-)!
64
posted on
10/26/2014 5:17:43 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
To: catfish1957
I: “Harry Reid and Obama thank you.”
C: “Principles be damned huh?”
How is it consistent with your claimed conservative principles to help Democrats stay in power?
65
posted on
10/26/2014 8:06:10 PM PDT
by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: Old Yeller
You would think that the Demwits would be content with their successful voter fraud schemes. Not if you have been paying attention.
Democrats are never content with simply winning.
Their goal is always complete destruction of their opposition.
-PJ
66
posted on
10/26/2014 8:15:53 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: catfish1957; JRandomFreeper
There is no sliding scale for conservatives.
If you support any of the following, you ain't a conservative:
1. Amnesty
2. Abortion
3. Gay Agenda
67
posted on
10/26/2014 10:34:02 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
The point of this exercise is to be able to vote for someone beside Cornyn. I am open to suggestions.
68
posted on
10/27/2014 2:55:04 AM PDT
by
catfish1957
(Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
To: Innovative
How is it consistent with your claimed conservative principles to help Democrats stay in power?Cornyn is a safe seat. Get with the program man.
69
posted on
10/27/2014 2:56:20 AM PDT
by
catfish1957
(Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
To: JRandomFreeper
If you vote for a liberal, or encourage others to vote for a liberal, you ARE a liberal. That depends on what letter comes after the liberal's name.
E.g., if you can convince a liberal to vote for Nalph Raider instead of the D, that's not as good as getting the person to vote for the conservative candidate, but, in the end, the effect is the same namely, to improve the conservative's chance of winning.
70
posted on
10/27/2014 3:11:00 AM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: SoConPubbie
Mitt may have been a pretend conservative, but these losers are openly hostile to conservatism and should be treated as such.
I just saw an ad on Twitter for Haugh with the line “make weed not war”. Seriously, the Senate’s full of bums, but a dope smoking 50 something pizza delivery guy is not exactly going to improve the gene pool up there.
71
posted on
10/27/2014 3:34:18 PM PDT
by
JacksonCalhoun
(Ignoring liberals is the best medicine.)
To: JacksonCalhoun
Mitt is:
1. For Amnesty
2. Supports Abortion
3. Supported Global Warming
4. Taxed everything in sight while Governor of MA.
5. Supported the so-called "Assault Weapons" ban
6. Implemented his own brand of Socialized Medicine.
7. Supports Amnesty
8. Supports Gay Adoption
9. Supports Gays in the Boy Scouts
10. Supports Gays in the Military.
I don't know how much more "Hostile to conservatism" you can be without being Karl Marx!
72
posted on
10/27/2014 3:38:20 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: JacksonCalhoun
Mitt may have been a pretend conservative, but these losers are openly hostile to conservatism and should be treated as such.
Mitt is:
1. For Amnesty
2. Supports Abortion
3. Supported Global Warming
4. Taxed everything in sight while Governor of MA.
5. Supported the so-called "Assault Weapons" ban
6. Implemented his own brand of Socialized Medicine.
7. Supports Amnesty
8. Supports Gay Adoption
9. Supports Gays in the Boy Scouts
10. Supports Gays in the Military.
I don't know how much more "Hostile to conservatism" you can be without being Karl Marx!
73
posted on
10/27/2014 3:38:51 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
Is there a difference between being for amnesty and supporting amnesty?
74
posted on
10/27/2014 3:39:50 PM PDT
by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson