Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charlie Baker for governor (Boston Globe endorses!)
Boston Globe ^ | 10/26/14 | Boston Globe Editorial Board

Posted on 10/27/2014 1:40:08 AM PDT by jalisco555

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj

.egabrag sdrawkcab, skcus ylsuoires cibarA


61 posted on 10/27/2014 3:58:08 PM PDT by Impy (Voting democrat out of spite? Then you are America's enemy, like every other rat voter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj
نعم، أنت على حق. مثل النعامة الجبان أو العاهرة بيتا، لديهم رؤوسهم في الرمال.
62 posted on 10/27/2014 5:23:05 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj

Me likey speaky code. :)


63 posted on 10/27/2014 5:36:44 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

You might want to sue your college. Unless you’re home schooled. ;-]


64 posted on 10/27/2014 5:39:17 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
When you choose “neither” you are choosing the Democrat!!

When you choose "neither", you're choosing someone else.

Unless you can show me a voting column that reads "this vote isn't really for whom I'm casting it. It's really for the Democrat because someone else says so."

65 posted on 10/27/2014 5:44:02 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
It’s OK. The Glop wouldn’t endorse Baker if he wasn’t a Socialist.

I think the excerpt is clear. They expect Baker to be a competent manager and Coakley even more political and incompetent than Patrick. True, they don't see a hard core conservative in Baker.

66 posted on 10/27/2014 5:58:05 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (antine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy; EternalVigilance; Finny; RitaOK
Ann Archy:

Having been where you are now but that was at least four years ago, I am going to mostly refrain from shouting at you here. You are always free to join us in rebellion as I always was but refused to acknowledge the rebellion as the more sensible course until Eternal Vigilance patiently persuaded me when no POTUS election was immediately pending.

Most of us who are rebelling were once and often for decades loyal Republicans. When I was growing up in the 1950s and early 1960s, my family were Labor Democrats whether they registered as Democrats or not. John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson and even Hubert Humphrey did not seem so bad. Johnson and Humphrey were taxaholics but that was only money and had little to do with my family. They believed in a strong military and aggressive foreign policy which seemed sufficient at the time. Goldwater made me, as a high school student, a conservative Republican.

I was not old enough to vote until Nixon ran in 1968. I voted for him twice. Although I was a Reagan State Chairman against useless Feckless Ford, I held my nose in 1976 and voted for that miserable leftist excuse for a "Republican" who was married to abortion cheerleader and all purpose social revolutionary Betty Ford. That Gerald and Betty are no longer with us makes us a better party and a better nation. Otherwise, the Wall Street and K Street Corrupticans would be dragging them out at national conventions to be admired by people who ought to know better. Naturally, Ford, having not a shred of conservative principle to his name, got beaten in an embarrassing fashion by Jimmuh Peanut who carried every Confederate state other than Virginia.

Nevertheless, although Ford refused to invite Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn to be welcomed at the White House in a year when that great man of letters was the commencement speaker at Harvard University. Ford was a scared widdle wabbitsa fearful that the soviet authorities might not wuv him anymore. What a maroon! What a total embarrassment to American patriots and other anti-communists!

Fortunately, Ford did not dare to try to run against Jimmuh Peanut in 1980. One whuppin' was enough for Ford. Instead, the GOP-E sent George Herbert Walker Bush and about five weaklings (Comrade John Anderson, Robert Dole, Phil Crane, John Connolly and I forget who else) up against Ronaldus Maximus. The Reagan nomination was saved by movement conservatives at the grassroots and by actor Jimmy Stewart in his Air Force Reserve General's uniform addressing an Amway rally with an impassioned speech for Reagan. Once nominated, Reagan used his movement instincts, his stage presence, and his relentless principled attack on all things liberal and Cahtuh to reduce Jimmuh Peanut to 49 electoral votes and mashed Mondale even worse in 1984 when Mondale carried only DC and Minnesota.

Poof! there went the reputation of the timeless Wall Street Republican hysteria that any conservative would be destroyed in a POTUS election and that the only chance of GOP victory was to nominate a $$$$$ mushball utterly wedded to the money agenda and nothing else! But...in 1988, the Establishment struck back, nominated totally clueless Bush the Elder, George Herbert Walker "New World Order" Bush. Running in the afterglow of eight years of Ronaldus Maximus, old George squandered the legacy in less than four years. [Read my lips! No new taxes! and he was promptly rolled by Tip O'Neill] Here was Gerald Ford II! Oh, isn't it wonderful, Percival, one of US is POTUS again!!! No, Muffie, not really. He may have graduated Yale Phi Beta Kappa in economics but he does not have a clue!

So, Poppy Bush was defeated in 1992 by the Arkansas Antichrist who at least believed in something other than $$$$$. 1996: Bob "Tax Collector for the Welfare State" Dole. Wasn't that a thrilling contest? No, it was not. The Demonrats could have run Monica if she was old enough and elected her over Dole.

Then, Percival, we had the sand to nominate Bush the Younger who at least had more brain cells than his old man and generally avoided his dad's idjit advisers and elitist embarrassments. Of course, he had some of his own like Tokyo Rove. Six decent years and then a total collapse followed by subsidizing each and every Ivy League yuppie incompetent enough to trigger the disaster. Massive amounts of taxpayer money were shoveled into saving mansions in the Hamptons while unemployment became the new normal for those who were not Masters of the Universe. McCain assured us )before the election of 2008 that Obozo would make a fine POTUS. McCain was my last vote for a GOP POTUS candidate while holding my nose. From Nixon to McCain, I voted for each and every GOP POTUS nominee and held my nose on each other than Reagan and, maybe, Bush the Younger.

I voted for Eternal Vigilance in 2012. I am thankful that he gave me someone to vote for. I will never again vote for second worst. The dwindling rank and file of the GOP will have to elect the increasingly useless GOP nominees without me and without millions of former Republicans who have had enough, now and forever.

Myth Romney retired the trophy. He deserved absolutely no votes from anyone who imagined him/her self a Republican, much less a conservative. He is and always has been a rampaging pro-abort, pro-homosexual agenda, anti-gun, never part of the military, always an envirowhacko, fashionable to the nth degree and absolutely, utterly useless in politics. He bought the nomination with BIG NY money and he could not get elected to save his donkey. Now, he is getting the old itch again! He just knows that he and the presidency were made for each other.

If the GOP wants its voters back, it will nominate candidates worthy of our votes. If not, not! Until it does, we shall keep on peeling voters off the corpse of the GOP.

No one can, with a straight face, tell God that voting for the likes of Myth Romney was an attempt to salvage this country, etc. Romney and Obozo are two of a kind. Unless you think that God is a double secret Republican or that Myth Romney is any better than Obozo (other than for Muffie's trust fund), we are indeed at a tipping point. That tipping point has to do with how long conservatives must be divided by the rotting corpse of the GOP.

One more chance???? We have as many more chances or none at all as God cares to give us and not one more. There are still those who put their faith in the GOP rather than in the one and only God.

The Federalists are gone due to greed and were replaced by the Whigs. Then the Whigs were gone due to greed and were replaced by the Republican Party which has had a long run and seems on its deathbed due to the same old greed. The sooner it disbands the better, in favor of a principled new party to restore the republic left to us by the Founding Fathers. Let us know when you are ready to rebel.

A vote that was not for Myth Romney and not for Obozo is NOT a Demonrat vote. It is a vote AGAINST Obozo and AGAINST Myth Romney. It is a vote FOR whomever one actually votes for. I don't OWE my vote to the Demonrats or to the likes of Myth Romney or to you or to any other Republican or Demonrat who feels entitled to my vote. You have a vote of your own. Use it as you see fit and examine your conscience so that you may defend its use to the very Highest Authority when the time comes.

You apparently are a reflexive GOP POTUS vote. You voted for Myth Romney. Therefore, you certainly CAN be more conservative, a LOT more conservative than you can byputting your soul in trust with Myth Romney as trustee.

67 posted on 10/27/2014 6:56:03 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

What is Lively’s party called? What are his credentials? What are his specific issue proposals?


68 posted on 10/27/2014 8:32:15 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Thank you! God bless you and yours!


69 posted on 10/27/2014 8:35:17 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

He’s on the ballot as an Independent.

He’s a pastor these days. But he used to have a lucrative law practice in California.

Call him a recovering lawyer.

His issue proposals are straight up the line conservative.


70 posted on 10/27/2014 8:48:57 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

Ungakwazi yini ukukholelwa zonke izingxabano ngale sihloko? Wonke umuntu udinga ozithokozisa isihogo phandle.

Yes, that is a real language. LOL.


71 posted on 10/27/2014 9:03:47 PM PDT by Impy (Voting democrat out of spite? Then you are America's enemy, like every other rat voter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson