Posted on 11/14/2014 11:55:28 AM PST by C19fan
Russian experts have claimed Malaysian Boeing MH17 was shot down by a Ukrainian warplane and not a ground to air missile. This follows the release of 'leaked' satellite images which show a missile streaking towards the passenger plane, produced tonight by Russia's main state broadcaster. It was claimed that the space pictures were from a British or US satellite.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Wow!!
Ping.
Holy crap.
Thinking about this a little, what are the chances a satellite in space just HAPPENS to be covering this particular ‘patch’ of sky during that time? I know it’s an area of ‘interest’, but are they THAT GOOD now? lol
“Thinking about this a little, what are the chances a satellite in space just HAPPENS to be covering this particular patch of sky during that time?”
We already know the Obama Administration was providing Satelite intelligence to Kiev before this happened.
LOL that’s freakin funny. They even have the missile visible. This picture will be quite convincing, at least for the drug and alcohol addled welfare dependents of Russia.
If this was so, why didn’t Russia facilitate evidence gathering on the crash site? They could find, if they looked, fragments of the missile to prove it was an A2A
and not a G2A... Does not pass the smell test with me.
The picture conflicts with the George Bilt account, which is hilarious to begin with.
They had to change their story yet again to say it was a Mig-29, because they already got caught in the stupid lie that it was an SU-25, which couldn’t have done it.
The evil mass-murdering Russian terrorists hope that they can just keep inventing lie after lie after lie, and that eventually their story will be believeable enough that most people will be stupid enough to believe it.
There’s lots of other problems too lol, besides the obvious problem with the idea that a satellite actually caught, and with such clear images too, the exact moment the plane fires a missile. For one thing there’s no evidence of any jets ever being in the area outside of Russian conspiracy claims, let alone coming at the plane from an angle. The type of plane the Russkies have been claiming shot down the airliner is a ground attack SU-25, its top speed, without armaments, is about 210MPH. The airliner was going about 510MPH. The Su-25 also can’t reach the same altitudes as the airliner. Actually, the closest it could get to the plane would be 10,000KM, and that would be right beneath the airliner, and that’s without armarments. Its air to air missiles are also incapable of causing the level of devastation even if they could get off a shot, as seen at the crash site. The Russkies actually got into a Wikipedia editing war in trying to raise its maximum altitude just to make their crap plausible for a gullible Wikipedia public.
Oh, they upgraded it to a Mig-29 now? lol, I was unaware of this development. I guess they lost the Wikipedia editing war.
Yeah that tidbit is included at the dailymail link. I actually clicked it and read the story because I thought it would be good for a laugh. I was right.
Looking at the inset part of photo,
looks like missle maybe fired from the ground......
It’s not like they haven’t done this before.....
I seem to recall that the Russian’s and the Ukranian’s fly the same type of aircraft as Ukrain was part of the Warsaw Pact at one time.
One thing I do know is that Russia has a lot of experience shooting down commercial airliners.
Does anyone recall South Korean Airways flight 007?The Russians shot it down without warning.
That is so fake as to be laughable
How many pictures a day are taken of any particular by satellite? Once a day? Once a week?
There is no way this is real.
Add to the fact that if the missile was a heater it would have been tracking (drifting) to the rear quadrant of the target aircraft immediately after launch. If the missile was a radar guided missile then the aircraft is not on the CATA and also the missile would have been tracking on a lead/intercept track immediately after launch instead of aimed straight at it.
This is nonsense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.