Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chajin

Do they have any legal right to stand on?


6 posted on 11/18/2014 11:12:25 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: traderrob6

So Sioux me.


7 posted on 11/18/2014 11:13:01 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: traderrob6
Do they have any legal right to stand on?

Not insofar as the tribal president asserts that the Rosebud Sioux reservation is a "sovereign nation." That simply isn't true, and Cyril Scott knows it isn't true. Pure bluster and posturing.

A basic principal of federal Indian law is that Congress has plenary jurisdiction over land set aside (i.e., reservations) for the use of Indians. In theory -- if not as a matter of practical political reality -- Congress could, by legislative act, abolish the Rosebud Sioux reservation entirely.

17 posted on 11/18/2014 11:19:27 AM PST by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: traderrob6

No...


43 posted on 11/18/2014 11:39:10 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson