Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New G.O.P. Showdown Threat (NYT editorial)
New York Times ^ | November 27, 2014

Posted on 11/28/2014 5:24:12 AM PST by reaganaut1

Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama announced with great gravity the other day that Republicans had decided not to impeach President Obama over his plan to allow millions of immigrants to remain in this country without fear of deportation through his executive authority. But that concession is not the end of the matter. He is planning much more serious mischief: using Congress’s power of the purse to pressure the White House into backing off.

Condemning the immigration action as “unlawful,” Mr. Sessions says he and other Republicans may filibuster any attempt to pay for government operations through the full fiscal year, which ends Oct. 1. Instead, he wants to pay for government through a series of short-term bills, possibly month to month, with each one trying to overturn Mr. Obama’s actions.

That raises the possibility of a budget shutdown fight every month for nearly a year. And Mr. Sessions’ voice will count in that fight — he is in line to be the new chairman of the Budget Committee.

Some Republican leaders, including the next majority leader, Senator Mitch McConnell, have tried to take a loftier position, saying they want a full year’s spending bill to avert a widespread shutdown. Nonetheless, they are seriously considering using short-term bills to pay for immigration enforcement. That approach is an implicit and reckless threat to close down immigration agencies to prevent them from issuing work permits to immigrants.

In the House, Speaker John Boehner has refused to rule out the possibility of threatening either a narrow or a full-scale shutdown to get Mr. Obama to back off his plans. Did Mr. Boehner learn nothing from the 16-day shutdown the House imposed on the country in October 2013?

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; jeffsessions; sessions; shutdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Jeff Sessions is usually right, and when the NYT opposes him, he's always right. As Bobby Jindal explained, it's will be Obama's decision to shut down the government because he wants to rewrite immigration law.
1 posted on 11/28/2014 5:24:12 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

If the NY Times is writing an editorial it usually means the issue worries them.


2 posted on 11/28/2014 5:26:51 AM PST by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist
Good point.

If the New York Times is against it, it must be good for The USA and the American people.

3 posted on 11/28/2014 5:28:33 AM PST by Savage Beast (Hubris and denial overwhelm Western Civilization. Nemesis and tragedy always follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Send Obama a budget that zeroes out funding for immigration executive orders, Obama care, increases military funding and funds the rest of the government. Let him decide if he will shut down the government. Hold his judicial and executive appointments up until he withdraws amnesty orders. Not a single judge or ambassador or anyone else approved until he withdraws. Stand firm and remember that we did not send you to DC to get along with Obama but to STOP him.


4 posted on 11/28/2014 5:33:49 AM PST by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I’m sorry, but without the imminent threat of impeachment there is no brake on Obolas actions. Even if it wouldn’t succeed the actions surrounding it would cause enough pot stirring to temper his excesses. Why disregard it? This is the congress’ version of ,”No boots on the ground”.


5 posted on 11/28/2014 5:34:10 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: reaganaut1
.


Team Planning Guide for your "National Day of Reckoning" protest against Obama's Illegal Amnesty - (Internet Link)


 photo NDR--05--2014-11-23_zps25ef213d.jpg

 photo Patton-05--2014-11-11_zpsce10a469.jpg

.

7 posted on 11/28/2014 5:35:58 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
He is planning much more serious mischief: using Congress’s power of the purse to pressure the White House into backing off.

Impeachment is the nuclear war of the Constitution. How is anything "more serious" than that?

8 posted on 11/28/2014 5:36:16 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Forcing the president to obey the law is “mischief” in the eyes of the Slimes. But breaking the law isn’t.

Bias? What bias?


9 posted on 11/28/2014 5:37:13 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Great link. Thanks. BTTT!


10 posted on 11/28/2014 5:39:36 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Did Mr. Boehner learn nothing from the 16-day shutdown the House imposed on the country in October 2013?

What? That DemocRats would trounce Republicans in the 2014 elections?

11 posted on 11/28/2014 5:40:26 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
I’m sorry, but without the imminent threat of impeachment there is no brake on Obolas actions.

Impeaching in the House is easy, convicting in the Senate with the 2/3 majority is the hard part. I don't think we should impeach just for show.

12 posted on 11/28/2014 5:42:35 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Seems I remember something about Esinhower saying “Crossing the Channel is the easy part, I don’t think we should land on the beaches just for show.”

We loose so much by “knowing” the results before we start.


13 posted on 11/28/2014 5:48:23 AM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The NYT makes no serious public, political, legal, or logical case here. All it has are strong words trying to make it sound ominous.

That means they know the smaller bill strategy and power of the purse will work.

IF the Republicans do it.


14 posted on 11/28/2014 5:50:27 AM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Obama has done more to damage this nation than anyone else. If anyone deserves to have the book...heck the entire library...thrown at him, he most certainly does.

If there ever was a time for the GOP to hit first, hit hard, and hit often, it’s now.

If they don’t, this nation is toast. We will financially collapse due to this new immigration deal...that is if Zer0Care doesn’t cause it first.

Didn’t think I could get anymore disgusted with the GOP’s excuses, but here I am.


15 posted on 11/28/2014 5:53:39 AM PST by Obstinate (I say we pack the Constitution and build the Mayflower II; this place is toast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Shucks, I was about to make the same exact point, except maybe using more florid language.

As Rush has being saying, and I agree totally with, this wave election was due to the people who voted wanting the Senate and House to oppose the President. If the current Senate and House do that, and do it successfully, 2016 will be an even stronger signal.

And the President decided to double down on dumb, hoping the Senate will try to play nice.


16 posted on 11/28/2014 5:54:31 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Governing made easy.

Whatever the NY Times editorial page is for or against, pursue the opposite.

17 posted on 11/28/2014 5:57:23 AM PST by JPG (The GOPe will always find a way to surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock

Just what we need - more vulgarity on FR


18 posted on 11/28/2014 5:59:41 AM PST by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

.... That approach is an implicit and reckless threat to close down immigration agencies to prevent them from issuing work permits to immigrants.....

Or a constitutional threat to close down a tyrannical executive whose pen and phone need to be shoved down his throat.


19 posted on 11/28/2014 6:01:17 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
What these Republicans in congress fail to recognize is that their is no other move.................

By allowing the Executive to break the law...... and TRUMP the Legislative Branch.....

Anything they do.... CAN BE TRUMPED!

Because the President, by Executive Order, will TRUMP that too........ Connect the dots!

If the Executive Branch is allowed to illegally break the law by Executive Action, then the Excutive branch can do that with ANYTHING..........

Here is the translation for the dumb Republicans in congress that still do not get it.....

The Executive Branch will TRUMP your “purse strings” too.... Duh!!

The Executive branch knows that by congress cowarding and doing ABSOULTLY NOTHING... they have basically become ceremonial at this point.

WHAT THEY PASS FROM HERE FORTH... DOES NOT MEAN JACK to the Excursive Branch.

At this point any signings by the Executive Brach,,,,,is simply to make these gutless collaborators feel like they are still relevant.

Congratulations Republicans in Congress. You have turned the U.S. Constitution on it's head. And THAT.... is the way you will be remembered for in history.

20 posted on 11/28/2014 6:01:24 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson