You are in error. I have not and will not defend the post you quoted.
I stand by my belief that verification of sources is crucial to understanding and justice.
Ma’am or Sir, I support pro-life organizations with money, not loose talk.
***************************
With all due respect, the responses that you have made to wagglebee's requests for clarification seem evasive.
That is absolutely FALSE!
Your first post on this thread was #57 to semaj where you wrote:
Freepers can debate in a civil manner. Let's not censor dissenting opinions. FR is a great place to argue in the best sense of that word.This was to post #54 by semaj:
Age of Reason and refermech are more than likely the same twisted person. I base this statement on the fact that both accounts were established November 4th, 1998 and August 6th 1998, respectively, and neither has bothered to provide any personal info on their home page.
I would hope the Admin might take notice.And the post by semaj was...wait for itreferring to Age of Reason's post:
If she didn’t abort the rapist’s kid, then it wasn’t rape.
So, while you may CLAIM that you didn't defend the post about aborting babies from rape, you certainly called for "civil debate" and not "censoring" such barbaric views.
I stand by my belief that verification of sources is crucial to understanding and justice.
You CLAIM to be pro-life, if this is the case than you certainly know that there are thousands of women out their who love their children conceived via rape. When you meet one of them are they required to prove to you that they were raped? The woman in this thread IS NOT speaking of understanding or justice, she is speaking about the love of a mother for her child regardless of the child's father.
Ma’am or Sir, I support pro-life organizations with money, not loose talk.
"Ma'am or Sir," now that's interesting. I'm pretty well known on Free Republic, especially on pro-life threads, and nearly everyone knows that I'm a man. However, whether I am a man or a woman is frequently discussed on anti-FReeper forums, perhaps that is where your confusion comes from.
Anti-FReepers also have a habit of posting lengthy diatribes rather than answering simple and direct queries, so I will ask again:
1. Can you give a single reason why a woman would cheat on her husband, have a rape kid done and then GO PUBLIC with the story?
2. Do you believe that the pro-life movement is somehow so unscrupulous that they would fabricate a story about a baby conceived in rape?
Surely someone who is pro-life would be able to answer these questions.