Posted on 01/01/2015 11:08:05 AM PST by Jonah Vark
TOP 2014 STORIES Special to WorldTribune.com, July 8 By Grace Vuoto There is a problem with President Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate: It’s a forgery, say multiple forensic experts who have examined it. A report detailing the evidence will soon be presented to Congress.
On April 27, 2011 the White House released Mr. Obama’s long-form birth certificate in an attempt to quell a public firestorm over the validity of the shorter version he provided prior to his 2008 election. A group of concerned citizens in Arizona suspected the Certificate of Live Birth produced in 2011 by the administration was fabricated; they asked Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County to investigate.
“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,” said Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Lt. Mike Zullo in an exclusive interview with WorldTribune..........
(Excerpt) Read more at worldtribune.com ...
The Manchurian Candidate ^2
AFAIK no expert has ever studied Obama’s BC. The only thing ever released is a scan of the original.
Race of father:
African
And the media is complicit in keeping everything about Obama’s deceptions from public view. Do a google search and there is nothing from any major news agency about Obama’s birth certificate fraud. They are biased, coerced, or incompetent. Or all of the above.
I downloaded the PDF file from the Whitehouse web site and opened it with the free Adobe Acrobat. If you zoom in enough so parts of it are outside the limits of your monitor screen, you can then hold down the left button on your mouse and move the image around. If you do this quickly, you will see the image appear to separate and portions will change appearance.
Zoom in where you see the changes and you can easily identify the fraud.
Thanks!
I copied the BC on the day it was posted at the White House website. When I pasted it to a Word document most of the printed wording disappeared. Is that an indication that it was manipulated or was that just a characteristic of a pdf file?
Here’s an example of how the Assocated Press covered the issue:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78645.html
And Fox News:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/27/obama-birth-certificate-moved-secure-location-months-ago/and Fox News:
And the New York Times Archive lists 102 articles that at least mention “the birther movement” (Obama birth certificate):
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/b/birther_movement/index.html
What would have really helped to draw more mainstream media attention to this issue would have been if the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives had held committee hearings on Obama’s eligibility once they took the majority in 2011.
Another thing that would have brought media attention would have been if any prosecuting attorney, from a local District Attorney to a state’s Republican Attorney General had convened a Grand Jury investigation into document forgery and election fraud.
How can you claim to be for Palin if you don’t believe what she says?
‘A report detailing the evidence will soon be presented to Congress.’
The probability that the can kickers will act appropriately is less than 1%.
‘What would have really helped to draw more mainstream media attention to this issue would have been if the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives had held committee hearings on Obama’s eligibility once they took the majority in 2011.’
‘PALIN/CRUZ: 2016’
Here is the question, NG. Do you not know enough about Palin to see the problem here?
Or do you know Palin’s position on the issues/political philosophy, but you despise it? I.e.: are you well aware that the first above quote, which you repeat with trollish frequency, flies in the face of one of Palin’s most basic political positions, and you get some kind of satisfaction from not-too-subtly calling her clueless and/or stupid?
It’s A or B.
Unless, of course, you have an alternative explanation for how you can claim to be a Palin backer while posting, with trollish frequency, a comment that contradicts one of Palin’s most fundamental beliefs/stances.
Odds are, given the trollish frequency with which you post a comment diametrically at odds with Palin’s political philosophy, you are a retread. Iow, a liberal, not a conservative at all. This is all the more likely since in your embarrassingly-often posted/repeated refrain, the Permanent Political Class is the solution, not the problem. [Note: that is a major hint. I.e.: in the event you have no earthly idea what Palin advocates, you can take that comment and extrapolate. After all, she is the one who coined the phrase, The Permanent Political Class...and she didn’t mean it as a compliment.]
You never heard of Reagan, it seems. On this point, he wholeheartedly agreed with Palin.
You, by contrast, disagree with both.
As well as with Mark Levin, in case you’re counting.
“Do you question his [Obama’s] faith and citizenship?” Governor Palin was asked today during an onstage interview hosted by the Long Island Association.
Sarah Palin’s response: “I don’t, and those are distractions. What we’re concerned about is the economy. And we’re concerned about the policies coming out of his administration and what he believes in terms of big government or private sector. So, no, the faith, the birth certificate, others can engage in that kind of conversation. It’s distracting. It gets annoying and let’s just stick with what really matters.”
February 17, 2011
http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/palin-obama-faith-citizenship-question-distracting/
Yet at the same time, Palin acknowledges that government is the problem, not the solution. More specifically, she identifies the Permanent Political Class as THE problem...whereas in your world, they are the solution.
What’s wrong with this picture?
In the world of *real* conservatives the Republican leadership, as typified by Boehner, are the biggest political hurdle/problem we face. Yet you return again and again, a batrillion times, to the idea that Boehner & Co could have delivered us from Obama’s fraud.
Why?
Because you see the Permanent Political Class as our saviors. In your mind they are not corrupt, not GOPe/RINO-don’t-rock-the-boat/maintain-the-status-quo Insider Elitists who consistently do more to prop up Obama than to further conservative ends; they are the white knights who should have delivered us from the biggest lie of the past two centuries.
This is a line only a liberal troll could take. No conservative with more than two brain cells believes Boehner would, under any condition, have challenged Obama. In Boehner’s world, Obama is an ally and the Tea Party is the villain.
In your world it is the opposite. That is why, although Palin consistently opposes and campaigns against the Permanent Political Class, you tout them as our best recourse. You are at one-hundred-percent cross purposes with Palin. She has no use for ‘Republican leadership.’ But you, over and over and over, etc., etc., etc., cite them as our best hope.
These are neither the actions of a conservative or of a Palin supporter. Period.
Put another way. You think if this country were facing a huge, major, disastrous problem of epic proportions, Palin would simply rely on the Republican leadership? A la, ‘Don’t worry about it, conservatives/patriots, both Boehner and the rest of the Permanent Political Class GOPe WA Elitist/Inside the Beltway cronies are on top of it. They, particularly Boehner, will either deal decisively with it, or if not, then it means it was never really a problem to begin with. Either way, we can fully and unequivocally trust Boehner & co., because they are not corrupt and they always have our and the country’s best interests at heart.’
You must believe Palin would say that; otherwise the comment you have posted a trillion times re: the Republican Leadership & Obama’s fraud would be idiotic drivel.
Get it?
A PDF tells you nothing.
Let’s see the original source document(s).
So many lies emanate from this regime that a, "The sun rises in the east" statement from them deserves to be triple checked. One would hope that Alvin T. Onaka, Hawai'i's State Registrar, has actually examined it, but his signature stamp did endorse the fraudulent copy, despite his undisputed expert status, so who knows?
We do know that which Barry Soetoro claimed to be a copy of his original birth certificate has been confirmed by several other experts to be a computer-manipulated forgery. Thus, anyone may legitimately make the claim that several document experts have examined either a copy of the original, or a forgery. Independent experts have said the copy is not simply a copy of an original created in the usually manner (by hospital clerks and a doctor) using a vintage 1960s typewriter typing on a Hawaii birth certificate form in 1961 or thereabouts.
The imaging system copy does not contain the same data that a reliable original of that copy could bear. The computer manipulations evident therein are too copious ever to have been contained in one or two originals.
We've been told one expert Hawai'ian birth certificate official--the one, in fact, that released it--died over a year ago in the water ditching of a commercial Cessna Caravan--falsely represented as "spiraling into the ocean" by one ABC account. Strange,eh? Shall we wonder if there were any other lies told surrounding that episode, as well? I think the answer is clearly yes.
Your comment seems entirely tangential to and dismissive of there being any problem with Barry's clearly false claim. Why would that be?
HF
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.