Posted on 01/08/2015 7:39:20 AM PST by doug from upland
244 died in the annual Haj stampede yesterday. I can't make some of you happy by adding a couple zeroes to the number, but perhaps I can give you a laugh by bringing back this Hitler rant.
If this upsets those practitioners of the religion of peace, well, that is just too bad.
HITLER RANTS ABOUT HAJ AND HIS BASEBALL GLOVE LANGUAGE WARNING! even though the offensive words are not spelled in their entirety.
ROFL
In times like this, with our own form of tyranny, which evidently we embrace through complacency, these takes on Hitler are entertaining but not constructive.
We need to begin the process of saving the constitution through direct action since votes and words have yet to reverse the course Obama is steering.
“...saving the constitution through direct action...”
Yes, but it is difficult to get folks to even vote much less take stronger measures. I don’t want to show up at the palace gates with a mob of only three Freepers and two Cuban refugees. But yes it is time to break out the torches, pitchforks, Garrands, etc.
The direct action I am speaking of is not showing up some place with pitchforks, unless of course everybody takes up arms, but that will never happen as a first course of action.
Back when the King of England imposed taxes on the colonies to raise money for the King colonists began a campaign of mocking the British soldiers in Boston and making outcasts of them. There was the Boston massacre which was a result of such mockery. The journalists of the day campaigned against the tyranny of the King and made it clear what the issues were. It took a lot of time to persuade even 35% of Bostonians that trouble lay ahead.
A bit later colonists took matters into their own hands through direct action, a sort of guerrilla action in tossing several dozen cases of tea into the harbor. It took years from that time to engage the Brit’s in the “shot heard ‘round the world” at Concord and Lexington.
Eight years later the King and his forces departed only to reengage the colonies in 1812. From the end of the revolution through the second world war the US was in a constant state of conflict somewhere. The present time is sort of normal.
Mark Steyn made a great observation yesterday related to Charlie Hebdo and the massacre. Go to Steynonline and see what he did and what he argues needs to be done in order to defeat the Islamist movement. His argument is that when politically correct or proper civil discourse prevents the free expression of ideas, especially ideas that some people dispise, then it makes for a concentrated target, easily destroyed by those offended. He believes that if every news outlet, every journalist, told the truth about Islamists, that the targets of the offended would be so numerous that it would be futile to act against them with violence. If there was violence it would be an act of war against the greater civil society not a small magazine publication of high visibility.
The American founders, our colonists, began the process of identifying the tyranny of King George way in advance of first shots fired. There was the idea that an act against amateur fighters, the colonists, would be an act against the entire colony.
It is important that in order to change the course Obama is steering we need to present the tyranny in a light that is identifiable to a majority. In that, we must make it clear that Obama must not have the power of the purse. The new congress has already screwed that up.
If there was a balanced budget it would mean at least two things; one, the economy was robust enough to generate enough tax revenue to pacify all of us who have been economically displaced by the tyranny of the New World Order and the “fundamental Transformation” espoused by Obama and others. The second thing would mean that a large segmant of the population would not be pacified because there will not be enough revenue to pay people to go along with him. That is what is going on now; Obama is paying people to be passive and to shut up and go along with the program using borrowed funds. If he did not have that option there would be serious disharmony.
We must clarify the problem, that no keystone pipeline, CO2 emission curbs, Carbon taxes, fighting Islam on the one hand while supplying them with weapons on the other, and so on and so forth, you get the picture. All of these things are to destroy the sovereignty of USA, especially open borders, for that we must fight, but it will take time, and unfortunately, blood.
Respecting Charlie Hebdo, the conventional wisdom (NT Times, The Pope, former US military officers, etc.) have already taken to the microphones to state that the terrorism Paris felt was as a direct result of “unfiltered” speech, that it was “extreme”, that it intentionally caused the mayhem and terrorism.
This is pure BS, and is a way to support and force politically correct speech and to demand such from so-called journalists.
This is to keep us silent on the tyranny of Obama and the destruction of our constitution.
In the day, say about 1770 or so, Franklin, Paine, and others made it clear that the King of England was a tyrant and had to leave them alone.
Our present MSM is in support of what the colonists fought (tyranny) starting at Lexington and Concord.
Perhaps you are right; bring on the pitchfork brigade as a start, even a few, to the gates of the White House and demand to see Obama. This will make for a good bit of news, distorted as usual by the MSM as they will call them “teapartiers”, right-wingers, bitter clingers, etc..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.