Posted on 02/10/2015 8:15:55 AM PST by grundle
Because for libtards the ends justify the means and if the means involves dishonesty then so be it. Also, for postmodernist libtards the narrative is more important than reality, and there is no such thing as objective truth,so the truth doesn't matter.
Hillary serves the banking elite, that’s why.
Because she has dirtbags like Brian Williams protecting her.
“....says she can’t understand how the former secretary of state weathered the scandal while NBC News anchor Brian Williams may not.”
.
Brian is not running for POTUS in 2016. That’s why.
“Brian is not running for POTUS in 2016. Thats why.”......
Right on! Williams may be a liberal news person but at this point, he’s not a politician nor in particular, a Clinton. Hitlary is the medias darling and they want no part in smearing her or causing anything which would result in her losing a potential POTUS election. God Forbid!
This was hubby Bill’s excuse for her - repeated over and over. I think I’ve read that she used it too but I can’t find that now....Sure Bill, we all get old and forget that we weren’t shot at in a war zone.....we got mixed up and it was in a drunken stupor that we were careless with words.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJzqDbUj9qU
The party turned its back on Hillary.
-PJ
Well she lost because she didn’t understand how the elections work. She focused on the big states many of which are proportional and ignored the small states many of which aren’t. So her big state wins didn’t give her the numbers she expected and her small state losses gave Obie big numbers.
But in the long run, 6 years later nobody likes her anymore. Her political career is done, nobody buys her books, she’s in mediocre health and she almost certainly won’t run next year. The whys and wherefores are many and debatable, but it does make me question the idea that she survived a Williams-like tale. It might be only a small part of why it’s over for her, maybe even not a part at all, but it is over for her, and it never really started.
She should have left him after leaving the White House. She was a bad decision-maker then, and she's still a bad decision-maker now.
-PJ
Well she can, but she’s a mean nasty person and Bill is the sole source of her likability. Many bad things can be said about Bill and they’d all be true, but one thing that must be admitted is the guy has star power. The camera loves him, the crowds love him, and reality around him just seems more fun. Really most of her recent failures are because she’s largely separated from him and standing on her own she has no light. She’s not exciting, she doesn’t project well, and reality around her seems very gray and dull.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.