Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP Must Be the Big-Tent Party
The National Interest ^ | February 19, 2015 | Peter Harris

Posted on 02/19/2015 1:25:10 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

The United States’ political parties have always been amalgams of factions rather than vehicles for any single interest. Partly because of the pressures of the electoral system and partly because of the republic’s vastness, forging either of the two major parties into a political monolith has been impossible; the need to cater to a wide base of Americans tends to keep the parties broad and relatively inclusive.

This embedded pluralism of the U.S. party system has diminished somewhat in the current era of polarization but it has not evaporated entirely. The parties are still relatively broad churches. This is clearest of the contemporary Republican Party than it is of the Democrat Party, with the emerging lineup for the GOP presidential primary season providing a good case in point.

From the brash conservative “fundamentalism” of Ted Cruz to the “compassionate” conservatism of Jeb Bush and from the “angry” neo-conservatism of John Bolton to the “libertarian-ish” bent of Rand Paul, the modern Republican Party encompasses an impressive array of views and interests. On issues such as immigration, foreign policy and civil liberties, healthy disagreement would seem to reign supreme. To be sure, it would be wrong to overstate the case: there are many issues on which the GOP does not gladly suffer dissenters and key demographic groups—most racial minority groups, for example—stubbornly refuse to see the party as an ally. But the point remains that the party edifice has been built in spite of deep political fissures.

Often, these split foundations are regarded as a weakness. The Republican Party will tear itself apart in the primary season, pundits aver. Civilized debate has been replaced by “trolling” or worse. Whoever emerges as the GOP’s presidential nominee will do so battered and bruised, the bloodied recipient of countless wounds inflicted by the leaders of rival factions within the party.

Moreover, the hydra-headed nature of the party makes it difficult to attract voters because almost everybody in America can find something offensive in the Republican crop. Rand Paul’s flirtation with the anti-vaccination lobby and his apparent willingness to entertain decidedly unorthodox monetary policies will alienate moderate conservatives. Mitt Romney’s background as a venture capitalist is off-putting to blue collar Americans. The tepid paternalism of Jeb Bush is anathema to hardcore Tea Party activists. Sarah Palin’s anti-intellectual populism appears vulgar to liberal-leaning would-be Republicans, and so on.

There is some truth to such arguments. Yet they should not be overstated. The internecine warfare of primary season is a routinized occurrence and hurts both the Republicans and the Democrats equally. In any case, there is no reason to believe that voters look less favorably upon a party capable of holding a vigorous internal debate than they do upon a party that looks rigid and unimaginative. And just because some voters might be irreparably turned off by the vulgarism of Sarah Palin or the cringe-worthy cluelessness of Mitt Romney, it does not mean that these same voters cannot be excited by the supposed “big ideas” of Newt Gingrich or the straight-talking persona of Chris Christie.

Broadness and inclusivity should be seen as strengths of American political parties. Narrowness and homogeneity are weaknesses, things that lead to introspection and condemn a party to the political wilderness if not terminal decline. The most successful political parties in history have been those that forged broad coalitions out of disparate interests: the Jacksonian-era Democrats; the progressive-era Republican Party of 1896-1932; the New Deal coalition, which was solid between 1932 and the late 1960s; and the Reagan coalition, to name but a few examples.

Today, the Democrats have few problems accepting diversity within their fold. But Republicans would do well to recognize that seemingly fringe politicians such as Rand Paul, Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz have a critical role to play in sustaining the vitality of their party. While they are unlikely to secure the mantle of leadership within the GOP, they nevertheless serve a valuable function as outriders—political entrepreneurs capable of rallying motivated groups of people to the Republican banner. Without such politicians, the great catch-all parties of the American republic could not exist. Narrow sectional interests would run amok instead of being knitted together into a “big tent” coalition.

Indeed, the biggest problem with the modern Republican Party is probably not that it is too diverse, but rather that it is not diverse enough. Too many Americans dismiss the party as “not for them.” As such, while Rand Paul’s politics might vex co-partisans such as Rick Perry, Ted Cruz and Jeb Bush, it should not be forgotten that this same brand of politics can serve to excite and engage large numbers of young Americans, racial minorities and others not usually tempted by the GOP brand. If the cost of making headway among such demographics is merely to chafe against other grandees within the party, it might just be a price that the party deems worth paying.

********

Peter Harris is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Government at the University of Texas, Austin and a Visiting Lecturer in Politics at Earlham College.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; bush; democrats; gop; lping; palin; randpaul; republicans; romney; teaparty; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
If what he says about Rand is true, why isn't his father president?
1 posted on 02/19/2015 1:25:10 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The GOP Must Be the Big TEA Party.

Fixed it.


2 posted on 02/19/2015 1:27:28 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

by the way, FURP!!


3 posted on 02/19/2015 1:28:12 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

4 posted on 02/19/2015 1:30:01 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They both suck

I skipped the article...too windy : )


5 posted on 02/19/2015 1:30:31 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

the GOP must become THIS kind of Party :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M


6 posted on 02/19/2015 1:31:56 PM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It seems like the GOP's image problems started around the late eighties, about the same time the term "big tent" was coined.

How about just deciding what the party stands for, and go with that? Or is that too simple?

BTW why is it the democrat party is never enjoined to change? Its the party thats been suffering epic losses lately.

7 posted on 02/19/2015 1:34:54 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

bttt


8 posted on 02/19/2015 1:39:55 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Big tent party is RINO code for being pro gay marriage, pro abortion, and pro amnesty. In other words, they need to be like Democrats.


9 posted on 02/19/2015 1:45:11 PM PST by Freestate316 (Know what you believe and why you believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Haven’t gone through Harris’s opus but if the aim is this; It’s not in the national interest to have the Republican party be the socialist alternative to the Godless socialist so called democrat (in name only) political opposition.


10 posted on 02/19/2015 1:57:25 PM PST by mosesdapoet (Some of my best rebuttals are in FR's along with meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A big tent would be great. Just make sure it’s filled with many, many people who have heard and believed the rightness of conservative values. It doesn’t mean that everything is washed down so it is meaningless in order to not offend anyone.

If you stand for nothing, you fall for anything.


11 posted on 02/19/2015 2:02:08 PM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Put conservatives at the top of the ticket (for a change) and you’ll be surprised how big the tent has to be.


12 posted on 02/19/2015 2:07:02 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“The GOP Must Be the Big TEA Party.

Fixed it.”

Thank you. We gain ground an inch at a time, but we will prevail.


13 posted on 02/19/2015 2:14:47 PM PST by stilloftyhenight (‘the Medieval Christian threat is under control’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There has to be one party to represent the citizens.

At this point both the GOP and the Democrats are representing Fraudulently Documented Foreigners and their employers.

When Jeb is nominated there must be an alternative and people have to have the courage to let go of the GOP.


14 posted on 02/19/2015 2:19:15 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace- No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The GOP should be a big tent party - working to attract people who want less government interference with various aspects of the lives of American citizens.

We should attract people who want fewer firearms laws infringing on our God-given right to keep and bear arms. We should attract people who want lower taxes, so we can keep more of the money we earn. We should attract people who want stronger protections on our God-given rights to freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and protection against unreasonable search and seizure. We should attract people who want ObamaCare killed so that our doctors will have more of a say over our medical care than some bureaucrat in HHS has. We should attract people who want the borders protected and immigration laws enforced, so that illegals don’t take jobs and tax dollars from American citizens.

There is a lot of room in the big tent of a small-government republican party, just not enough room for Bush, Romney, Christie, Rubio, and Graham.


15 posted on 02/19/2015 2:27:20 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

“It seems like the GOP’s image problems started around the late eighties, about the same time the term “big tent” was coined.”

And the establishment RINOs began to take over.


16 posted on 02/19/2015 2:37:26 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

The GOP should be a big tent party - working to attract people who want less government interference with various aspects of the lives of American citizens.

The GOP doesn’t teach or enunciate affirmative policy anymore.


17 posted on 02/19/2015 2:39:35 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

Something told me having all of those democrats switching to the GOP back then wouldn’t end up being such a good thing after all.


18 posted on 02/19/2015 2:41:28 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
The GOP doesn’t teach or enunciate affirmative policy anymore.

That is the problem, and Bush/Christie/Rubio/Romney are emblematic of that major problem. That's why we need Cruz.

19 posted on 02/19/2015 2:47:47 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet

When you read the article you find that he is calling for the GOP to embrace “outriders” like Cruz, Palin and Paul.


20 posted on 02/19/2015 3:06:39 PM PST by Lisbon1940
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson