Posted on 03/05/2015 10:56:52 AM PST by i88schwartz
She has got to be great in the sack...nothing else explains how she is, where she is.
While some girls F*&^ with grace and ease, Marie blows D*&^ like the summer breeze.
UGH ! Marie Harf is INFURIATING !!!
Harfbag?
It’s a quote from a Mark Steyn article. He was quoting someone else.
In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.
http://www.steynonline.com/6820/o-beautiful-for-specious-guys
Anyone espousing such idocy is aiding and abetting a felony. In and of itsel, a felony.
Arrest them all. Do it now...
-PJ
Everyone has known the “US” State Dept.
were traitorous whores abetting murderers,
rapists, and Islamic slavers using
US taxpayer money under color of Law.
Very accurate.
Not pertinent ..to WHAT??
Perhaps HARF doesnt quite GET what’s being Discussed in this matter??
Oh, it really hasn’t changed at all.
Imagine if Watergate happened under a democrat president versus Nixon the Republican, or if the Secretary of State doing the private email thing was a Republican working for a Republican president today.
The media are PART OF the democratic party.
No. It’s not. It’s a deliberate misinformation campaign. It’s an overt use of “telling the big lie” and making it stick via repetition.
Don’t Harf me, bro!
The media is not forced to take anyone seriously. The media could run all these clowns (including head clown Obozo) out of office (or phony baloney job in Barf’s case) if it wanted to do so.
It’s not up to Harf to decide what is pertinent and what is not.
Yes, except that the State Department doesn't have all of them. Only what Cankles decides to give.
Recently Obama’s former CIA director pleaded guilty to sharing classified information with his mistress/biographer even though that information was never included in a book about him.
So if there was classified information in Hillary's emails, then unless her home server were federal property and conformed to federal security requirements including access, etc., the HILTDIBEAST would be guilty of a serious crime.
Therefore the flunky must assume that Hillary's emails must contain no classified information or she is destroying her career by saying Hillary is a criminal. Of course the content is not relevant, because it has to be unclassified anything else would be “unthinkable.”
The state department internal e-mails to and from Cankles would be nice to have, but the problem is the people communicating with our Secretary of State who were not in the State Department.
That’s the whole point of having a private server.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.