Posted on 03/05/2015 6:49:00 PM PST by BAW
I’d like to see 9/11/2012 posts from Sidney
Yes, I understand that. In fact, I believe that’s how Petraeus was conversing with his mistress.
Yea, but what about BO@Obunga.com?
NOt sure what this has to do with my posting.
I think Hillary did this because for her it was the most private and secure way to do things. It also kept Obama from seeing her messages.
She has her own server...for her staff. Emails are sent only between them, no one outside of the server address.
YOu wouldn’t need to do the draft message thing.
I’d like to see 9/11/2012 posts from Sidney
I wonder if Petraus pled guilty to the charge knowing that his conviction would lend weight to the similar e-mail scandal about to be unleashed on her loathsomeness? After all, they can’t poo poo the whole thing if one of the most well known generals was just tried and convicted as well.
Hmmmm, verrrrrry interesting!
“I’d like to see 9/11/2012 posts from Sidney”
Might need to go through Mills.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/State-Department-Ops-Alert-FOIA.pdf
From: Sand, Maria W
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 4:07 PM
To: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Macmanus, Joseph E (S)
Cc: S_SpecialAssistants
Subject: FW: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU)
(snip)
You would be correct. What needs to be asked at this point is WHO set this “server” up and what was THEIR clearance? Also, clintonemail.com resolves to 208.91.197.27 which looks like it maps back geographically to the British Virgin Islands.
nmap -O clintonemail.com
Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-06 10:10 EST
Nmap scan report for clintonemail.com (208.91.197.27)
Host is up (0.026s latency).
Not shown: 998 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
53/tcp open domain
80/tcp open http
Warning: OSScan results may be unreliable because we could not find at least 1 open and 1 closed port
Device type: load balancer|WAP|general purpose
Running (JUST GUESSING): F5 Networks embedded (94%), Linksys embedded (90%), Linux 2.6.X (88%)
OS CPE: cpe:/h:linksys:befw11s4 cpe:/o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6
Aggressive OS guesses: F5 BIG-IP load balancer (94%), Linksys BEFW11S4 WAP (90%), Linux 2.6.11 - 2.6.18 (88%)
No exact OS matches for host (test conditions non-ideal).
OS detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org/submit/ .
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 19.88 seconds
besides the gear head stuff,read the whole thread
you will be needed for insight and advice
” This is a big F’n deal ! “
just spewed a Dunkin Donut
Actually Clinton factotum, Marie Harf, knew something——but it was too “nuanced” for the U of Va grad to figure out. “
My opinion of a U of VA degree just went down a notch. I’m sure when Travis got his, it wasn’t yet “watered down” : )
Maybe we should send e-mail to clownpants@clintonemail.com and oldcrusty@clintonemail.com and see what happens.
I’ll buy you another: )
Hey Baraq, this is Bill, will you assure Hillary a POTUS pardon on email-gate if she pulls out of the race?
Sure Bill, just send me a $300,000,000 check drawn on the Clinton Global Initiative.
LMAO!
yes - both people need to access the same account, from two different places
There would still be a record of that draft on the server. That’s where having physical access to the drive that contains that database comes in handy.
It becomes a necessity asap
Yes. But I do not believe for a second someone with the sense of entitlement a Clinton has, would reduce themselves to communicating via draft. because “what difference does it make”…
With endless possible email addresses there could be one for each unique recipient, or for any given subject.
If records still exist it will be at the other end of the communication. OR, if the email was transmitted over her cellular provider’s network, they would have a record.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.