Posted on 03/06/2015 9:23:33 AM PST by rktman
But Slate magazine claims that pointing these things out is “a new low.” As if highlighting the fact that background checks have been impotent to stop criminals is something that can’t be mentioned right now because Giffords is pushing background checks as a way to stop criminals.
(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...
It was well established long ago that anything that indicates the American Left is in error in any way is “not fair.”
Another clear indication of the overgrown spoiled children they are.
Didn’t the Proglodytes bring it up first?
Liberalism is a mental illness. It just can’t be said enough.
And, no amount of prozac will ever fix it either.
So, loughner was a stalker, and from the Myspace and Youtube links where he was connected to Gabby it looks like he was infatuated with her, or maybe in love with her I don’t know. But he did kill a Republican judge.
Unfortunately, this jibes with the Left counter-argument that a “good-guy with a gun” is just a criminal that hasn’t committed a crime yet.
Of course, this is a stupid argument, because it is the same definition as for a law-abiding citizen; someone who hasn’t committed a crime.
Fortunately for the Libs, like Alice’s White Queen, they’re allowed to hold multiple, mutually exclusive arguments at the same time.
Background checks reduce crime, and don’t burden law abiding citizens, who could turn to crime at any time, so it’s better to just ban guns.
LOL! Yup a simple case of IPOS/SPOS liblogic.
Facts are poisonous to a propaganda mouthpiece.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.