Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State. Dept. Refuses to Answer Whether Hillary Signed Separation Agreement
mrctv.org ^ | March 12, 2015 | Barbara Boland

Posted on 03/12/2015 12:28:16 PM PDT by grundle

State Department Spokesperson Jen Psaki refused to answer whether Hillary had signed the State Department's separation agreement when she left the department.

A Former DOJ attorney Shannen Coffin believes that Hillary Clinton committed a crime if she signed the Department's Form SF-109 STATE-USIA Separation Form and still retained 50,000 emails on her private server.

All employees of the State Department are required to sign a document called the SF-109 STATE-USIA Separation Form upon the end of their employment with the department.

When asked if Hillary Clinton signed the form, Psaki said: "I think this has been asked, it was more than two years ago; I don't have an update on that specific question at this point;."

It's just a yes or no question, Ms. Psaki.

It's not more complicated than that -- and we will all know the answer soon when the dozens of outstanding FOIA requests are answered.

Apparently, the Department is committed to dragging out and lengthening this scandal for as long as possible.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: hillary; hillaryclinton; hillaryemails; hillaryemailserver; of109; psakipresser; sf109; statedeptpresser; statedeptscandals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
When Hillary quit being Secretary of State, she was supposed to sign a form that said she had turned over all of her work related emails. It is a crime to lie on this form. But the "most transparent administration in history" is refusing to say whether or not she signed this form.
1 posted on 03/12/2015 12:28:16 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

More transparency from the most transparent administration in history.


2 posted on 03/12/2015 12:29:15 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

just as with the emails..we cant find the form


3 posted on 03/12/2015 12:30:44 PM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

What may have happened before Hillarys press conference with selected UN reporters on Tuesday:

Hillary: Mr President, can you help me with this matter? I’m a little worried

Obama: Hillary, just bring the server to me and let’s see what’s on it

Hillary: Mr President, you know I can’t do that, it’s private

Obama: Hillary, without the server and not knowing what’s on it, I don’t see how I can help you

Hillary: Mr President, you just have to trust me

Obama (Chuckle) Hillary, no, I don’t trust you, that’s the point. Hope it goes well for you. And I’m informing my staff to distanced itself from you and your staff. And by the way, I have a special team right now going over all your expenses, staff finances and expenditures for all State Department personnel. And the IRS is going to be looking at your tax returns. I just can’t have any surprises. Oh and your WH access has been denied for now. Good Luck

Hillary: But Mr. President, (Click) Hello? Hello? Mr President? Hello? Oh crap!


4 posted on 03/12/2015 12:30:44 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

It’s not, like, pertinent, you know, and stuff.


5 posted on 03/12/2015 12:30:53 PM PDT by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

If she did sign it then there’s perjury.

If she didn’t sign it, why was the special favor granted? Someone else would have been in on this to permit the requirement not to be “required.”


6 posted on 03/12/2015 12:33:17 PM PDT by bajabaja (Too ugly to be scanned at the airports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

The Bamster better check his Arkancide insurance.


7 posted on 03/12/2015 12:34:08 PM PDT by shove_it (SAE and proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grundle
When asked if Hillary Clinton signed the form, Psaki said: "I think this has been asked, it was more than two years ago; I don't have an update on that specific question at this point."

Not to worry, they're trot out Marie Harf to explain further, LOL!

8 posted on 03/12/2015 12:34:45 PM PDT by The Cajun (Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Us lowly peasants would be in jail for half the crap this witch has done..
GOP better not let crisis go to waste..but it’s GOP so don’t have high hopes.
Can you imagine if this Walker or Cruz.


9 posted on 03/12/2015 12:34:57 PM PDT by rainee (Her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

The Kelly File should be entertaining tonight.


10 posted on 03/12/2015 12:37:45 PM PDT by shove_it (SAE and proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Pick up the pace Congress.


11 posted on 03/12/2015 12:38:32 PM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Jen Psaki and Obama can’t answer whether Hillary Clinton complied with the law.

The significance of this is they’re tossing her under the bus.

Lying on a Separation Agreement is a felony.

Its more than just about whether Hillary did public business on her private e-mail server now.


12 posted on 03/12/2015 12:43:42 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I’m sure Killary’s SF-109 STATE-USIA Separation Form, is in the same trash can with John Kerry’s SF-180.


13 posted on 03/12/2015 12:47:02 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Screwed either way now.


14 posted on 03/12/2015 12:55:32 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it
The Kelly File should be entertaining tonight.

Indeed. I just purchased more popcorn!

15 posted on 03/12/2015 12:58:45 PM PDT by CedarDave (Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 - If you have a 22-year old car, the bumper stickers are still good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I’ve got to say that Jen Psaki’s answer is one of the most creative examples of weasely bureaucraticese ever uttered in my lifetime. Bravo!


16 posted on 03/12/2015 1:04:51 PM PDT by D_Idaho ("For we wrestle not against flesh and blood...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Obama did away with the Separation Agreement


17 posted on 03/12/2015 1:05:00 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Apparently, the Department is committed to dragging out and lengthening this scandal for as long as possible.

I am fine with it being dragged out until 2016.

18 posted on 03/12/2015 1:13:02 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

18 us code 2071

A) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.


19 posted on 03/12/2015 1:13:12 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The way I was following it last night, it sounds like she is in deep trouble either way. If she did sign it, then she lied and/or failed to comply. If she didn’t sign it, WHY NOT?

I predict that she’ll have some health emergency “soon”, that makes her unavailable (again) for any further scrutiny or questioning.


20 posted on 03/12/2015 1:19:18 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson