Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy veteran takes on Saipan's restriction on handguns
Stars and Stripes ^ | 3/23/15 | Olson

Posted on 03/23/2015 8:08:45 AM PDT by pabianice

A Navy veteran and his wife are challenging a ban on handguns in Saipan, arguing in federal court that the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands is bound by the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment.

“I’ve always been a firm believer in our constitutional rights, whether that’s freedom of speech, religion or the right to keep and bear arms or right to privacy, and I’m pretty sure that what I’m doing in this case is in defense of those convictions,” said David J. Radich, 44, a former petty officer third class.

His wife, Li-Rong Radich, was severely beaten by an intruder in 2010, a trauma that her husband says might have been prevented if she had a handgun.

While the islands’ citizens can receive permits for a select few long guns, the law prevents them from possessing those for self-defense, even at home. Regulation of handguns varies in the four other inhabited U.S. territories. With differing degrees of regulation, they are allowed in America’s only other commonwealth territory, Puerto Rico, as well as in Guam and the Virgin Islands, but handguns are banned in American Samoa.

(Excerpt) Read more at stripes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; marianaislands; saipan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 03/23/2015 8:08:45 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice

As a former third class, he is more qualified to be President than Jerkohauntus.


2 posted on 03/23/2015 8:12:30 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

World War II history: Saipan folded like a cheap tent when invaded. Guam fought bravely and resisted until U.S. forces returned.


3 posted on 03/23/2015 8:14:11 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
I added banglist to the keywords, to reach a wide audience of FReepers interested in firearm and 2nd Amendment issues. ;)
4 posted on 03/23/2015 8:14:29 AM PDT by deoetdoctrinae (Become a monthly donor and END FREEPATHONS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“World War II history: Saipan folded like a cheap tent when invaded. Guam fought bravely and resisted until U.S. forces returned.”

History check. Saipan was part of Japan having been awarded to Japan by the League of Nations in 1918.


5 posted on 03/23/2015 8:18:39 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Not part of Japan, but governed by Japan as a temporary trust territory. So, yeah, the Japanese invasion was more like Hitler's invasion of Austria.

FWIW, both Saipan and Guam are peopled by the same Chamarro natives, but the Guamanians still view the Saipanese as collaborators who are not their equals.

6 posted on 03/23/2015 8:27:29 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“Not part of Japan, but governed by Japan as a temporary trust territory. So, yeah, the Japanese invasion was more like Hitler’s invasion of Austria.”

You are confused. Saipan became part of the US as a trust territory after WWII.

There was NO Japanese invasion of Saipan in WWII. It was the US that invaded Saipan in 1944.

Japan invaded Saipan in 1914 but at that time it was basically just a few farmers and fisherman with no means of defense.


7 posted on 03/23/2015 8:35:24 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“but the Guamanians still view the Saipanese as collaborators who are not their equals.”

Guam was not occupied by the Japanese. In 1943, Saipan had a civilian population of 29,348 Japanese settlers and 3,926 Chamorro and Caroline Islanders and by 1944 there were over 30,000 Japanese military in Saipan. Basically, they were not collaborators, they were Japanese.


8 posted on 03/23/2015 8:43:15 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
"Guam was not occupied by the Japanese."

Strange, the U.S. Military killed 18,000 Japanese non-occupiers.

"In July 1944, US forces retook the island of Guam after weeks of fierce fighting, leading to over 7,000 American casualties and over 18,000 Japanese killed."

Battle of Guam

9 posted on 03/23/2015 8:50:10 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Out of context. Guam was NOT occupied by the Japanese till they invaded it in 1941. Saipan was occupied by the Japanese prior to WWII.


10 posted on 03/23/2015 8:55:21 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
“Not part of Japan, but governed by Japan as a temporary trust territory. So, yeah, the Japanese invasion was more like Hitler’s invasion of Austria.”

You are confused. Saipan became part of the US as a trust territory after WWII.

He is not confused. The same Wikipedia article you cite (without attribution) in your next post (8) explains:

In 1914, during World War I, the island was captured [from Germany] by the Empire of Japan, which was awarded formal control in 1918 by the League of Nations as part of the South Pacific Mandate.

So, yes: Japan had received a mandate to govern Saipan.

That the U.S. was later (after WW II) awarded a mandate to govern Saipan does not invalidate Vigilanteman's statement.

Regards,

11 posted on 03/23/2015 8:56:05 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pabianice; GeronL
I still don't grasp this.

In the 70's Saipan became fully integrated with the U.S.A.

Completely and totally like Guam, or any other territory.

So the U.S. Constitution is the sovereign law of the Island.

I know the Gun Grabbers ignore it, but in this case it should be an open and shut case.

Those people are American Citizens.

Those Islands ARE American, Apple pie and Baseball and all that.

Why is this even a question?

12 posted on 03/23/2015 9:07:40 AM PDT by KC_Lion (The Issue is Not The Issue, The Issue is The Revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Not meaning to extend this cat fight, but:

"In 1914, during World War I, the island was captured [from Germany] by the Empire of Japan, which was awarded formal control in 1918 by the League of Nations as part of the South Pacific Mandate.
So, yes: Japan had received a mandate to govern Saipan."

Seems to me that the crux of the argument hinges on the definition of "captured'. The mandate to govern appears to have been issued after the capture.

Now, we return our FR readers to the 'Saipan capture' catfight already in progress.
13 posted on 03/23/2015 9:08:34 AM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Your point is well taken, but when the war ended, the Chamorro and Caroline Islanders remained on Saipan; the Japanese did not. The United States took control of the island (and not just Saipan but smaller islands around it) and proposed that they have territorial status equal to Guam or American Samoa.

The Guamanians objected. This is why Guam retains a special territorial status today. Saipan, Tinian, Rota and the other 12 uninhabited islands form the Northern Mariana Island Commonwealth (NMIC) and Guam, alone, the southernmost of the Mariana Islands retains territorial status.

Some say this is now actually a disadvantage for Guam since, as a territory, they have hope of achieving statehood whereas a commonwealth such as Puerto Rico or the NMIC could choose either statehood or independence.

As a practical matter, however, it means little since either commonwealth or territory residents enjoy almost all of the advantages of U.S. citizenship without the taxing obligations.

14 posted on 03/23/2015 9:14:47 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion
Those people are American Citizens.

No, they are not U.S. citizens.

They are only U.S. nationals.

Regards,

15 posted on 03/23/2015 9:15:54 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Before WWII Japan occupied Saipan. During WWII the United States invaded and occupied Saipan, and we still occupy it. Before WWII the United States occupied Guam and the Japanese evicted us. We took back Guam during WWII and we still occupy it. That’s all the “hair splitting” context that matters.


16 posted on 03/23/2015 9:23:17 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
"The Covenant was fully implemented November 3, 1986, pursuant to Presidential Proclamation no. 5564, which conferred United States citizenship on legally qualified CNMI [Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands] residents."

-Wikipedia

So it looks like I was wrong, and natives of Saipan are indeed U.S. citizens.

Regards,

17 posted on 03/23/2015 9:25:59 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Yes they are American Citizens.

Samoans are U.S. Nationals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_nationality_law#Birth_within_the_United_States

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86756.pdf

18 posted on 03/23/2015 9:28:38 AM PDT by KC_Lion (The Issue is Not The Issue, The Issue is The Revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“Saipan folded like a cheap tent when invaded. “

Really?

Bombardment of Saipan began on 13 June 1944. Fifteen battleships were involved, and 165,000 shells were fired. The invasion took over three weeks and the Japanese fought to the last man losing over 30,000 killed not including the civilians. Over 1000 Japanese civilians committed suicide in the last days of the battle.


19 posted on 03/23/2015 9:33:11 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

“That the U.S. was later (after WW II) awarded a mandate to govern Saipan does not invalidate Vigilanteman’s statement.

Regards, “

Regards. He said Japan received Saipan as a temporary trust territory. The League of Nations gave Saipan to Japan as a Mandate. The U.N. gave Saipan to the U.S. as a trust territory.


20 posted on 03/23/2015 9:38:43 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson