Posted on 04/07/2015 1:57:46 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
BALTIMORE - Democratic primary voters should find little difference in political ideology between the two candidates running to replace retiring Sen. Barbara Mikulski, according to outside analysts.
Both U.S. Reps. Donna Edwards and Chris Van Hollen are ranked “hardcore liberals” by On The Issues, a political website that analyzes policy issues supported by federal, state and local politicians.
Both Edwards and Van Hollen are considered reliable Democrats, who vote with their party 100% of the time, according to The Sunlight Foundation, a national, non-partisan organization that focuses on transparency and accountability in government and politics.
Rep. Elijah Cummings, 7th, ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Rep. John Sarbanes, 3rd, have also been reported as considering running for Mikulski’s seat.
(Excerpt) Read more at abc2news.com ...
Lucky me!
Van Hollan supports Israel, Edward supports the ‘philistines’
You’re not alone, although we are vastly outnumbered.
Maryland needs to succeed from the US...and join North Korea...
We’ll see if their strategy works. Americans are PRETTY DAMN SICK of liberals. Maryland may be a “blue state” but they do elect Republicans statewide, at times.
The White party bosses aren’t keen on Edwards’ uppity attempt at higher office. Some think if she wins the primary, we have an opening.
I wouldn’t be so sure, but I hope so.
Largely depends if the GOP puts up a credible candidate and if Donna Edwards takes the nomination (if she is the lone Black candidate with other Whites, there’s almost no way she could lose the primary).
As I’ve said, even in White Dem areas, they’re not necessarily keen on Black candidates from exclusively Black constituencies whose issues are just as exclusively racial in nature. It was why I had a very strong feeling that Larry Hogan, Jr. would prevail for MD Governor, even against the sitting Lt Gov.
Had Zero faced a substantial candidate in Jack Ryan (minus the exposed sex scandal), I think he’d have had a difficult time winning the Senate race in IL. He lucked out by facing Alan Keyes, who was the only one who didn’t seem to realize he was being used. Even Mike Ditka would’ve blown Zero to pieces (and you may recall I was demanding he be drafted here back in ‘04).
Robots. Zombies.
Maryland "Freak State" PING!
Robots. Zombies.
***
Robots. Zombies. America-haters. Christophobes.
But I believe that Donna is more of a Van Jones democrat.
Kathleen Kennedy Townsend may run, split the White vote in the rat primary.
I just can’t see Donna Edwards losing the nomination with all these White Dems running. If I were Van Hollen, I’d be really pissed at KKT. The sole possible threats to Edwards is if Ben Jealous and PG County Exec Rushern Baker decide to run (Elijah Cummings is also mentioned, but he’s got more power in the House). If Reps. Sarbanes, Ruppersberger and Delaney get in, this could be the biggest free-for-all for a Senate seat in modern history.
Only Steny Hoyer isn’t interested in running, and that only because he still believes he’ll be Speaker eventually.
Settling on a single viable Republican to run is important here. With Edwards as the Dem nominee, this is absolutely a winnable seat, even in a Presidential year.
DJ, I think that at least one additional prominent Democrat will run, probably a black Democrat from Baltimore (the only remaining demographic with a chance of winning). Maybe Mayor Stephanie Ralings-Blake. If a Baltimore black jumps in, it could be anyone’s race.
Even if Edwards or KKT win the RAT nomination, it still will be very difficult for the GOP to win the general, particularly in a presidential year. Also, we don’t have much of a bench. The newly elected governor and Lt. Gov. won’t run so quickly. Congressman Andy Harris likely is too conservative to win statewide, and I don’t think that he’ll give up his safe district to run (particularly in a presidential year). Maybe Bonino? Or that Charles County GOP chairman, Charles Lollar, who might cut into the black vote if one of tbe white Democrats wi s the nomination. And I guess there’s always Ehrlich and Steele ....
My personal feeling, as I’ve stated before, is that I think Marylanders have a bit of an aversion to electing a Black to a key top office (Governor or Senator). Well, you could say they voted heavily for Zero, but that wasn’t for a statewide office. I think there are enough White Democrats in the state that they do NOT want to elect a Black, especially one from PG County, which is now even more Black and more Dem than the city of Baltimore.
That was my gut feeling when I predicted early on that Lt Gov. Anthony Brown would lose to Larry Hogan, Jr. for Governor. If B’more Mayor Rawlings-Blake gets in, it would be simply to stop Edwards (I think if she did that, there would be a major uproar amongst Black MD Dems), and as you said, that would enable a split and a White Dem to win the nomination (and then it would be back to Van Hollen or KKT).
I expect there’s already enough feeling amongst MD Black Dems that they are OWED a top office, given that they are at present lowballed on what they contribute in votes vs. the offices they hold (especially at the higher levels). As it is, and likely to their chagrin, the weak MD GOP has already put in 2 Black Lt Governors (Steele & current Boyd Rutherford), while they’ve gotten just Anthony Brown, for whom will likely get the consolation prize of Donna Edwards’ seat in the House.
Where I think Edwards will have a problem in the general goes back to the fact that (as with Anthony Brown), these were candidates that did not rise from mixed-race constituencies, but from a virtually all-Black enclave (PG County). “Representing Whites” is not something they’ve had to deal with or concern themselves with, and White MD Dems know this (they won’t SAY it, but they know it — and they provided the victory for Hogan).
I believe it remains a critical problem for almost every Black pol representing a VRA district at the Congressional level. Nearly all of them will never be able to win a statewide office, because they’re so exclusively focused on race. Maryland should be a state where they ought to be given the political dynamics, but it has yet to happen (and again, I discount Zero, since that was a fluke unlikely to occur again for a long time to come).
If Anthony Brown had broken through, it would be easier to say Edwards would have a better time of it, but I think she will be the most divisive nominee the MD Dems could put up, and especially coming out of that free-for-all primary where racism charges are likely to fly fast and furious.
I don’t which on the GOP side is necessarily the best to put up. Andy Harris seems ideologically preferable, but his CD hasn’t gotten a statewide winner in a century. Dan Bongino is a curious possibility (he did almost beat Delaney in a Dem-gerrymandered seat) and hails from the CD that has elected 3 of the last 4 Republican Senators (both Bealls and Mathias), but he had to deal with a disastrous mess running statewide when 2 candidates split the center-right vote.
That leaves us with Bob Ehrlich. Despite problems with him, he may have the best shot having won statewide. However, as was pointed out, he ran so poorly in 2010 in his rematch against O’Malley to be accused of “throwing the race.” So here, this is a black mark against him (and would be his 4th consecutive race he’s run in 14 years, having lost all but the first). Other nominees, such as Lollar, are too desultory to consider. We’ve got to run a first-tier challenger.
Its way too painful for me to try to follow this by myself.
After 2012 when Ehrlich was slaughtered by O Malley, with giving next to no fight back to him,
and after gay marriage passed in 2010 referendum, the year of the national GOP wave,
I told myself I wouldn't probably wont vote again here in Maryland.
But as I saw 2014 shape up as another 2002 in the backlash against Dems here(Ehrlich /Steele got the governorship ), I had to vote. I was glad I did.
But this was a 12 year Dem winning spree here.
KKT has decided against running, endorses Van Hollen.
Sarbanes is out, which is good news for Van Hollen.
This could be a sleeper. Perhaps ex-Governor Robert Erlich could be persuaded to run.
We need Edwards to be the rat to have any chance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.