Posted on 04/16/2015 3:35:16 AM PDT by markomalley
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida), the newest and youngest official Republican candidate for president, has said he believes marriage should be “traditional”—between a man and a woman.
So Fusion’s Jorge Ramos asked him: If someone in his family or on his staff were gay and getting married, would he attend the wedding?
“If it’s somebody in my life that I care for, of course I would,” Rubio told Ramos in an interview on Wednesday.
“I’m not going to hurt them simply because I disagree with a choice they’ve made or because I disagree with a decision they’ve made, or whatever it may be,” he added. “Ultimately, if someone that you care for and is part of your family has decided to move in one direction or another or feels that way because of who they love, you respect that because you love them.”
Rubio spoke with Ramos about a variety of issues, including marriage equality, immigration reform, climate change, President Barack Obama’s move to normalize relations with Cuba, and which rapper or singer he’d like to perform at his potential 2017 inauguration.
In the early throes of his campaign, Rubio has positioned himself as the candidate of “tomorrow.” He has cast himself as a young, fresh alternative to other Republicans and to likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who he referred to in his announcement speech as the candidate of “yesterday.”
But his stance on gay marriage has led to questions on whether he’s more out of touch than Clinton with young people on certain issues. According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry. On Tuesday, CNN anchor Jake Tapper called Rubio “the candidate of yesterday” on the issue of marriage equality.
Rubio said that while he personally opposes gay marriage, he would encourage people in favor to petition their state legislatures to permit same-sex marriages. He does not think the decision should be left up to courts, he said.
“I would point out that we live in a free society,” Rubio said. “If people want to change the definition of marriage, they should petition their state legislature, and they can have that debate in the political arena. Who I don’t think should be redefining marriage is the court system.”
Rubio, who is Catholic, noted that his faith also teaches that divorce is wrong, and he drew on that as a comparison to his personal feelings on gay marriage.
“But again, as I said, I’m a member of the Catholic faith that teaches, for example, that divorce is wrong,” Rubio said. “But if someone gets divorced, I’m not going to stop loving them or having them a part of our lives.”
The silver lining of this issue is that voters like me who oppose abortion AND sodomite marriage can no longer be referred to as ‘single issue’ voters. :-)
But I must say, many on this thread have made my point much clearer than I could ever do. Case in point right here. Thanks!
...so he’s locked up the ‘log cabin’ voters...that should put Marco right over the top. (IMO, sarcasm that obvious doesn’t need to be labeled.)
I'll go ahead and agree with that sentiment. Didn't Rubio begin his campaign by getting up in the journolists' grills a little bit?
Laying aside the specifics under discussion in the thread, we need a "Refusing to Take the Bait, for Dummies" book.
Look how many of the 98ers got caught in the bugzapper thread eight years ago.
Sorry, forgot to address this...
WTH?
I'm sure you are, as are all Rockefeller Republicans.
Trouble is, what you interpret as vanity and sanctimony is actually your own cognitive dissonance trying to square the circle of values you share with genuine conservatives and those you do not share.
Hogwash. Even liberal Oregon voted 66% against gay marriage.
It was a metaphor.
I find it amusing you seem to dread islam, but have contempt for Christians.
Maybe you just have a problem with religion....
Yeah, but they weren't the "cool" people... ;)
************************
I'd forgotten about that. Every so often one of them shows up on a thread daring a zot.
An impossibility.
Correct on all counts.
Regarding my last terse post to you-—please ignore it.
We’re on the same side, and that’s what matters.
Yeah, but would he bake a gay cake? That’ the REAL test.
Of course. I look forward to cheering them on to certain defeat.
If a man will not take a stand to defend the traditions and values of his Church, then he cannot be trusted to take a stand to defend the traditions and values of his Country.
Here, take mine….
Maybe you just have a problem with religion...."
I am a Christian. Thanks again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.