Posted on 04/18/2015 5:13:23 PM PDT by blueyon
Between the shrimp on a treadmill study and then the IRS's Star Trek-themed training films, there have been more than a few cries of outrage from taxpayers fed-up with their hard earned dollars seemingly wasted on hyper-frivolous reports and projects, the federal government doesn't seem to have gotten the message. Case in point would be the article published by The Washington Free Beacon on April 17, 2015, which details the government dropping nearly a half million dollars to study the levels of sexual satisfaction for men after their first "penetrative same-sex experience."
With the impressive project title of FIRST AND SUBSEQUENT SAME-SEX SEXUAL SATISFACTION AND BEHAVIOR IN YOUNG AAMSM, the National Institute of Health (NIH) isn't shelling out $410,265 just to study any ol' generic homosexual males. No, the NIH is very specific as to who is at the receiving end of their probe.
This go 'round of bureaucrats questionable stewardship of the American workers tribute to Washington comes in the form of an in depth study on how the first experience of anal sex has been for African American adolescent men who have sex with men. Or in official NIH-speak: Young AAMSM.
While the federal government is bestowing the heaps of cash to Baltimore's famed Johns Hopkins University to conduct the study, special emphasis is placed on delving into the innermost secrets of what exactly aids in the development of "self-esteem in young gay and bisexual men".
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
You forget, Michelle with a strap-on was not first.
“No, the NIH is very specific as to who is at the receiving end of their probe.”
The taxpayer.
I wonder if they’ll do a study on how the US taxpayers feel about having to constantly take it up their a**es.
Better yet, when will the US taxpayer say “ENOUGH IS ENOUGH”?
MSM is the same as Rush calls the “Drive-By Media.”
It makes no sense in this NIH usage: AAMSM.
When I worked for a Fortune 500 Corporation, I was responsible overseeing a $22,000,000 Yearly Expense Budget.
Every Year I had to justify the all Budget Expenses and I always had a Cost Reduction Goal to meet. If I didn’t hit or exceed the expected reductions, I would be looking for a new Job.
The idea that our Government thinks there are no cost savings in a $4,000,000,000,000 Yearly Budget is beyond the pale.
I would wager that 10% to 20% of that Budget is a complete waste of Taxpayer Money, but I think I am being very “Conservative” in that estimate. LOL
Without the TYPOS this time. LOL
When I worked for a Fortune 500 Corporation, I was responsible for overseeing a $22,000,000 Yearly Expense Budget.
Every Year I had to justify all Budget Expenses and I always had a Cost Reduction Goal to meet. If I didn’t hit or exceed the expected reductions, I would be looking for a new Job.
The idea that our Government thinks there are no cost savings in a $4,000,000,000,000 Yearly Budget is beyond the pale.
I would wager that 10% to 20% of that Budget is a complete waste of Taxpayer Money, but I think I am being very “Conservative” in that estimate. LOL
Good observation. I wonder if this is related to the NAMBLA agenda.
Funny! ...so digusto, tho’.
Time to divorce from the federal whore. i am not kidding. A convention fo willing States should start with a declaration of independence.
what the HELL?!
Government is like a [big] baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other.
- Ronald Reagan
When you think of government, take an enterprise, and take away reason and accountability.
- Me
Government is like a [big] baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other.
- Ronald Reagan
When you think of government, take an enterprise, and take away reason and accountability.
- Me (with thanks to “As Good As it Gets”)
I didn’t want to know this. :-(
MSM = men who have sex with men.
MSM= Men having Sex with Men
do any freepers know exactly what part of our national budget the money for this study would have come from? if there were any amendments just to find the money and which representatives may have tagged their cabooses to this wagon
If anyone thinks we dont need to flush the government down the toilet
Gross! I wonder if their study includes whether the receiving partner did an enema before the “love” experiment.
very fitting!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.