Well, as a matter of fact...
Posted on 04/19/2015 4:40:25 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
April 19th, 2015
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Govs. John Kasich, R-Ohio, and Terry McAuliffe, D-Va.; Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.; former Gov. Martin O'Malley, D-Md.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas; Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Ben Cardin, D-Md.; former Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va.; Ali Rezaian, whose brother Jason, a Washington Post correspondent, is jailed in Iran.
Well, as a matter of fact...
Here’s an interesting take,could Linda be gay?
http://americablog.com/2013/05/is-lindsey-graham-gay.html
In this case, Graham’s hypocrisy that broke the camel’s back is immigration reform. I have it on good authority from someone intimately involved in the immigration reform process that Lindsey Graham is the central reason that the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA), which would help stop the forced deportation of foreign-born gay spouses, is being blocked from being added to the immigration bill. While other Senators might be bluffing about their opposition to addressing the immigration needs of gay binational couples in immigration reform, I’m told Graham isn’t bluffing.
The obvious question arises as to why Graham is holding gays hostage in the immigration bill.
Jon-Stewart-Lindsey-Graham-syriaOne theory is that UAFA is Graham’s legislative beard. A beard is a woman a gay man socializes with in order to throw off suspicions that he’s actually gay. In this case, the theory goes, Lindsey Graham is using UAFA in order to throw off the suspicions of the Tea Party voters back home who are challenging him in a high-profile primary. Their suspicions are that: A) Graham is a liberal; and B) he’s gay.
Graham’s support for immigration reform is hardly helping him dispel the closet liberal image. But his opposition to UAFA, the theory goes, is a two-fer: It let’s Graham oppose something, anything, related to immigration reform (his support for the measure has been a thorn in his side with the far-right back home), and it has the added benefit of bashing gays. Everyone knows that a closeted gay man wouldn’t bash his own people, right? So bashing UAFA “proves” that Graham is straight.
Isn't Ole-crusty out there bashing hedge-fund managers?
That's a nice thought but one not backed by any recent history. One can always hope and pray though.
I have two theories on the question of Graham’s marital non-status:
1) Never found a female (or anything else) who he actually liked more than he did himself.
2) Did pretty well as a lawyer convincing juries to buy his line, but couldn’t locate a female (or anything else) dumb enough to establish anything one-on-one with him.
(My personal choice is ALL OF THE ABOVE)
This is an old link but has a lot of interesting “stuff”
Especialy the Mia Pope stuff about the dear leader.
Exactly,none of it makes any sense.
I find it extremely interesting that Chris Wallace even brought up the issue of Graham’s marital status....especially at this time when he’s announcing plans to run for president.
An the way he broached the subject I thought interesting....under the guise of perhaps raising his little sister prevented him from marrying though I don’t for a minute think anyone would buy that at a reason for not marrying.
Graham’s what? Close to age 50 I’d think. If you ain’t married by this age it isn’t because you’re still raising your little sister.
I argue the issue was brought up for a reasons because....come on....WHERE ARE THE FEMALES IN HIS LIFE?
How much you wanna bet Lindsay runs on the Jeb Bush ticket?
We need to reclaim/recover that term and deliberately start using it as we expose them for lying socialists and RATagandists that they are.
We need to couple that with a quote from Truman: "I wasn't giving them Hell. I told the truth and they just thought it was Hell."
Start "Swiftboating" the RATs!...and say as much. Use our definition.
Haven’t we been using socialistic trickle up since Pelosi and the Democrats won control in 1997.
No, it's all trickle down, Reagan's concept is simply a description of natural free market dynamics. Rich people build companies and employ people to run them and do the grunt work.
Real "trickle down" is what the RATs do; confiscate trillion$ from the American workers and give most of it to the ultimate parasitic class....nameless faceless union thug bureaucRATs. What pittance is left over is used to buy votes from the "world owes me a living" parasites.
And they could give a RATs @$$ about the truly needy.
Ahem...
I still don’t have a tv here at the shop and no computer at home but soon the office will be ready.....
This time, there should be the Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Laura Ingrahm (etc) debates series.
Then the conservative candidates should skip the phony RAT debates.
Says Mr.Alabama where the temperature is usually great and rarely 80 degrees at midnight with a thousand per cent humidity.... Try sleeping in that dude...
Trickle down worked for 20 years after Reagan including Clinton’s term. He finally destroyed it when he left and the continued housing for the poor program killed it.
Marxism sure isn’t working.
You guys have great summer weather up there, some of the best.
MY EYES!
I easily could have gone the rest of my life without ever having to see that.
Could be post of the week material here....
Yeah guess you are right.Commies never get in trouble with the drivebys.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.