Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taliban admit to beheading Afghan soliders ‘in revenge’
Long War Journal ^ | 4/21/15 | Bill Roggio

Posted on 04/21/2015 6:07:04 PM PDT by markomalley

The Taliban admitted that its fighters beheaded seven Afghan soldiers during clashes last week in the northeastern province of Badakhshan. The Taliban acknowledged that the beheadings are “contradictory to rules of engagement,” but then justified the gruesome acts as revenge for Afghan soldiers mutilating Taliban fighters.

In a statement released today on Voice of Jihad, the Taliban’s official media outlet, the jihadist group said it “launched its usual investigation” of the reports of the beheadings “as part of its Islamic and humanitarian responsibility.”

The Taliban killed, captured, or wounded 33 troops after more than 250 Taliban fighters assaulted the district of Jurm in Badakhshan last week, according to news reports. Afghan forces claimed that 20 Taliban fighters were killed in the fighting.

The Taliban claimed that after a clash on March 20 in the Wardoj district, “the invader nurtured mercenaries [Afghan soldiers and police] brutally shot the martyrs in the face to the point they were unrecognizable in violation of all principles of Islam and humanity as well as all established rules of war.”

This incident, which has not been confirmed, was followed by another clash in the Jurm district on April 14.

“But since the stooge regime troops had mutilated Mujahideen in the previous engagement in violation of all Islamic and human norms therefore a few Mujahideen in revenge beheaded seven regime soldiers on their own,” the Taliban stated.

The Taliban then proceeded to place the blame squarely on Afghan forces in Badakhshan.

“While the Islamic Emirate considers both of the incidents contradictory to rules of engagement [sic] however it places the blame of both grisly incidents squarely on the invaders and their hirelings because they were the first ones to commit such an act,” the Taliban stated.

The Taliban then referred to the group’s “rules of engagement and booklet of military code of conduct issued by the Islamic Emirate.” According to the booklet, the Taliban fighters should have executed the Afghan troops by shooting them, not beheading them.

“Article no. 21 this military code of conduct booklet of the Islamic Emirate states: (21 – If the blood of a criminal becomes lawful Shariah wise, and the death penalty is handed, be it to a spy or other criminal, he must be shot with a rifle, and its filming is prohibited),” according to the Taliban statement.

The Taliban did not state if the fighters who beheaded the Afghan troops would be punished.

Areas of Badakhshan have been contested

The once-peaceful province of Badakhshan has become increasingly unstable over the past several years, as the Taliban, the Haqqani Network, and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan have exerted their influence in the remote northeastern area. The province was transferred from ISAF to Afghan control at the end of January 2012.

The Taliban have taken control of districts in Badakhshan three times since the summer of 2013.

In May 2014, the Taliban overran the Yamgan district and captured 27 government officials. Afghan troops claimed to have retaken control of Yamgan, but the Taliban claimed to remain in the district.

In September 2013, the Taliban overran the Wardoj district center, prompting an Afghan military operation to retake the government complex. Shortly after the government claimed Wardoj was cleared, the Taliban ambushed an Afghan police convoy, killing 23 police officers and capturing more than 20. The Taliban denied being driven from the district.

Also in September 2013, the Taliban seized control of the Karan wa Munjan district center in Badakhshan. Shortly after the Taliban took the district, Afghan security forces claimed to have regained control of Karan wa Munjan.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: rop

1 posted on 04/21/2015 6:07:04 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

To do something something so gruesome would have to require a mental disease. Islam is a mental disease.


2 posted on 04/21/2015 6:13:42 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Beheading is no more brutal than shooting unarmed yoots on purple thang, you gun clinging crusader on a high horse!


3 posted on 04/21/2015 6:19:33 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
To be honest, I'm surprised that the average Afghani soldier still has the will to resist the Taliban. Those soldiers have got to see the handwriting on the wall. Sooner or later, the central government will collapse, and the country will fragmentize. And then the Taliban will pick up the pieces.

It's a show we've seen before.

4 posted on 04/21/2015 6:19:41 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Beheading someone is about the most perverted thing I’ve ever heard. And these evil pos say they do it for their god? Hussein Obama acts oblivious to it. He is an evil pos too.


5 posted on 04/21/2015 6:31:40 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: boycott

IMO, Islam reveals itself. You don’t even have to criticize it.

You look at the things done in it’s name, it’s just a vile despicable ideology.

It’s subhuman in it’s dealings with it’s own believers.

The so-called justice is Satanic. It’s like a bad dream you never wake up from.


6 posted on 04/21/2015 6:34:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The fruits of Islam are known. It is vile and rotten.


7 posted on 04/21/2015 6:37:22 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

...And soetoro loves it.


8 posted on 04/21/2015 7:01:56 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Sure is...


9 posted on 04/22/2015 10:21:41 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Agreed, and so much so he wants this ideology to dominate the world.

This guy may not be the anti-Christ, but he’s close enough to give the subsequent “Damon” movies a run for the money.

Think about those plots. This guy fits them to a tee.


10 posted on 04/22/2015 10:36:15 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson