Posted on 04/26/2015 10:35:27 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen
--snip-- The Brady Center's "bad apple" campaign stop was the third since September, when the effort began in Chicago. It seeks to pressure gun dealers to tighten buyer-screening measures beyond what is required by law. Several dozen marchers carried signs or pictures of loved ones killed by guns, calling for Firing Line to adopt a "code of conduct" that would include photographing every person who buys a gun there.
(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...
Morons - troublemakers with nothing constructive to do with their lives.
We should require that abortion clinics take pictures of everyone who gets an abortion.
how about taking a picture of anyone that votes?
The statistical reality is that any given black is many times more likely to commit murder, than there is that any given firearm will be used to murder. Perhaps it is time to register minorities, not guns?
Now that all the Brady’s are dead, will they borrow Gabby to roll out?
Not minorities.
Asian Americans are among the most law-abiding people on Earth.
We’re talking about Blacks and Hispanics and a growing number of Moslems-in-residence.
Period.
The first thing I thought of while skimming the article-the way abortion protestors have to operate is different.
probably be the first ones to sue for discrimination if the gun owner refused to sell to a moosie or young black, even if they could pass the federali standards.
Do these same clowns support voter I.D.?
Anyone realize that if the gun rules proposed by these nuts had been in place when Brady and Gabby got shot, Brady would still have been shot (6 shot .22 RG) and Gabby (first hit to Gabby, second hit wounded another, third hit killed Judge Roll) would have still been shot.
Exactly correct. The plan is to put the businesses in a lose-lose situation. Follow the law, and get protested for not discriminating. Discriminate, and get sued.
If you look a little, you see the same thing in a number of other “progressive” destruction campaigns, based on denial of reality.
Sell to people who can’t afford to buy houses, or get shut down; Sell to people who can’t afford to buy houses, and be blamed for the disaster that follows.
Produce oil and gas and be blamed as a polluter; cut down on the production because of regulation, and be called a price gouger.
Build a store in a crime ridden urban hell, and be called an expoiter; Don’t rebuild it after it is burned down and be called a racist who promotes “food deserts”.
The simple tactic is to use a lack of fact and logic to create lose/lose situations for people who actually produce things and provide goods and services, sometimes this is used for a direct shakedown, sometimes simply as way to push for more tax money. It always ends up as destructive in society, detrimental to most, and benificial to only a very few political activists and politicians.
They won't get a chance to do that.
Mark Kelly has been working to fill the vacuum after the Brady's were gone.
He will be rolling out his wife to suck up the money.
Someone needs to introduce this group to the “Black Lives Matter” group, so they can compare notes.
Spot on post. People who engage in such tactics are enemies of this country, no exaggeration.
You shouldn’t go there. Bloomberg himself came out of the closet to call for the disarming of young black men.
“95 percent of murders fall into a specific category: male, minority and between the ages of 15 and 25. Cities need to get guns out of this group’s hands.” — Michael Bloomberg
Mostly black people in a hurry to go back on the plantation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.