Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official Identifies One Suspect in Attack at Texas Anti-Islam Event
The New York Times ^ | MAY 4, 2015 | By MANNY FERNANDEZ and RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA

Posted on 05/04/2015 9:57:31 AM PDT by Salman

GARLAND, Tex. — One of the two gunmen who were killed Sunday after opening fire at an event where people were invited to present cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad was identified on Monday by a law enforcement official as a man who had previously been labeled by the F.B.I. as a jihadist terrorism suspect.

Police officers shot and killed the man, identified as Elton Simpson of Phoenix, and his companion Sunday evening, outside the Curtis Culwell Center, at an event organized by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, a New York-based group that also uses the name Stop Islamization of America. The gunfire, which began shortly before 7 p.m., left a security guard wounded.

In 2010, federal prosecutors in Arizona charged Mr. Simpson with plotting to travel to Somalia “for the purpose of engaging in violent jihad,” and then lying to a federal agent about his plans. A judge found him guilty of lying to the agent, but said the government had not proved that his plan involved terrorism, and sentenced him to three years’ probation.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1moretime; curtisculwellcenter; eltonsimpson; freepmuch; garland; jihad; religionofpieces; texas; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Reagan0704

the most recent entries in the Draw Mohammad Obama Contest

http://tinyurl.com/drawobama


21 posted on 05/04/2015 10:09:33 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
So would Christianity across the globe be considered Anti-Islam by the NYTimes?

Unequivocally yes. The very existence of Christians is Anti-Islam as far as Muslims, the NY Times and our own President are concerned.

22 posted on 05/04/2015 10:09:53 AM PDT by JustaCowgirl (the left has redefined the word 'racism' to mean any disagreement with any liberal about any topic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Salman
Let's go ahead and snip one more from the article. In spite of itself, ...

Ms. Geller described Sunday’s event as pro-free speech, and said that Muslims had become a “special class” that Americans were no longer allowed to offend.

“The media is self-enforcing a Shariah,” she said, referring to Islamic law. “Under the Shariah you cannot criticize or offend Islam.”


23 posted on 05/04/2015 10:10:16 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dqban22
I wonder how the gay jihadists including Obie Huessein Mohammed Obama will handle this one??


24 posted on 05/04/2015 10:11:31 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Nope, nothing to see here. I didn’t click on the link, did NYT actually say ‘anti-islam event’?

Makes you wonder how many TRUE sleeper cells are here inside and learning from these wannabe amateurs.


25 posted on 05/04/2015 10:13:16 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

sarcasm


26 posted on 05/04/2015 10:14:14 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Bookmark


27 posted on 05/04/2015 10:15:41 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

Your artwork *ALWAYS* makes me laugh!

Good work!


28 posted on 05/04/2015 10:15:44 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: don-o
And that's why I am 100% anti-islam and have no beef at all with the NYT's headline. I am also anti-abortion, anti-communism and anti-sodomy. You're either pro-islam or anti-islam and taking an unambiguous, no-nonsense stand against evil is righteous. Don't be lukewarm, being unabashedly anti-islam is being pro-American!
29 posted on 05/04/2015 10:17:15 AM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Salman

So the NYT thinks that cartoons are “anti-islam.” And not freedom of speech. You’d think journalists would get it, but it’s been a long time since the NYT was anything but a public relations outlet.


30 posted on 05/04/2015 10:17:27 AM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaCowgirl

Shew...Thank you, thought I was goin nuts for a moment.


31 posted on 05/04/2015 10:21:09 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Prison Convert? Illegal alien? Legal alien?


32 posted on 05/04/2015 10:21:15 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

If Christians assaulted a group of atheists who were holding a We Hate Jesus gathering, the Slimes would be quick in condemning the Christians and calling for crackdowns on other Christian groups. They’d be hollering about freedom of speech and the right to offend. Hypocrites.


33 posted on 05/04/2015 10:21:15 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Veto!
I, of course, hate the NYT. But it confounds me that some FReepers objecting to the term "anti-islam" in the headline.

If you're anti-tyranny, anti-abortion, anti-gungrabbers and anti-sodomy, you're by definition also anti-islam. There is no middle ground, you're either pro-islam or anti-islam. It's clear that the world would be a far better place with every trace of islam totally eradicated.

34 posted on 05/04/2015 10:23:56 AM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Voltaire: “To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

islam = satan’s death cult
allah = satan
Pedophile moohammud = satan’s follower


35 posted on 05/04/2015 10:27:21 AM PDT by newfreep ("Evil succeeds when good men do nothting" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Mission Accomplshed!

I love doing this stuff!

Thank you!


36 posted on 05/04/2015 10:31:47 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
The comments at the NYSlimes come down solidly against Pamela Geller and supportive of those poor taunted (but luckily for us, dead) jihadis.

2 Thess Chapter 2

7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

37 posted on 05/04/2015 10:32:41 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

Exactly!.... and well said!


38 posted on 05/04/2015 10:33:45 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Salman

What? The second guy (and likely wife of the first - they were mates afterall) is the 12th Imam or something?


39 posted on 05/04/2015 10:34:07 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Wonder what’s taking so long to identify the second shooter?”

They had to strain the remains for the fingerprints...


40 posted on 05/04/2015 10:37:17 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson