Judge in THIS State Rules if Pledge Violates Rights of Atheists

“How long before Judge gets his IRS audit paperwork?”

Always be gracious and thank the fat, doughnut-munching, 50 IQ jellyfish squatting at their desks in the local IRS office for buying 1.2 billion rounds of ammo for your use.

“Protecting students from viewpoints and ideas that may offend or upset them is not and has never been the role of public schools in America.”

Finally, a judge that gets it!

there is no comma, nor should the phrase be spoken with a pause.

Abolish government schools. Problem solved. You win the prestigious "Best Observation on an Important Political Topic" award!

The absurdly of modern Federal edicts from the bench only serve to demonstrate the corruption of those issuing them, and the out of check power of their office in enforcing such lawless edicts upon a free people.

As perhaps one of the best of their kin once pointed out. Every tyrant in the world has a “bill of rights” which they impose and ignore selectively according to the interest of their own ideological dispositions which they can then simply call “interpenetration”.

The only thing that makes a country and people free is the structure of power which limits the ambition and capability of men in the state to issue edicts regardless of their intent. This is done by the force of other men in competing positions to nullify said abuses when they don’t line up with the law as written. Thus making rule of law rather than the rule one group of men.

The position of judge of course came from the position of arbitrator where specific disputes in a particular case of law could be resolved. Not where law itself in general could be dictated only its application.

The Federal courts have over the centuries progressively corrupted and expanded this power using the concept of common law to dictate that all cases of law must be decided in the same way, thus establishing a standard of application which they then choose to ignore in radical ways that depart not only from the common understanding of the text but also their previous actions on the same law. Thus making them a legislator in practice. With lower courts still bound the the common law being the peons of their army of enforcers, and the written law(made by the real legislator) being otherwise meaningless.

This isn’t rule of law its rule of 9 federal employees in black robes, and without law there can be no freedom. Only the ever changing ‘moral’ or ideological discretion of those employees.