Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor Walker Breaks Silence On Patriot Act, NSA Stance
TruthInMedia ^ | May 19, 2015

Posted on 05/20/2015 11:35:51 AM PDT by SoConPubbie

Appearing on Fox News’ Special Report with Bret Baier, presumptive Republican presidential candidate Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker gave Americans their first preview on where a President Walker would stand on civil liberties issues such as NSA spying authorized by the highly controversial Patriot Act.

Baier pushed Walker to give a “yes” or “no” on whether or not he would reauthorize the controversial NSA spying program by asking him whether or not he would vote for it if he were currently a sitting Senator. Walker, responding with typical political rhetoric, never actually answering Baier’s question, but instead said, that the meta-data collected was necessary and access to it was needed.

Earlier in the month, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the NSA spy program is illegal.

This puts Walker at odds with declared conservative candidates Senators Rand Paul and Ted Cruz. Although Cruz did once vote to re-authorize the Patriot Act, he now seems prepared to stand against the upcoming re-authorization vote. Paul, the most staunch opponent of NSA spying in the Senate, is preparing to filibuster the upcoming Patriot Act re-authorization vote.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016election; demagogicparty; election2016; gope; memebuilding; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; paultardation; paultardnoisemachine; randpaulnoisemachine; randsconcerntrolls; scottwalker; walker; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: paristexas

I support the bill that Cruz authored which is being advanced by Mike Lee. That Bill replaces the Patriot Act and removes the most egregious parts concerning the NSA.

Cruz’s record is that he champions the Constitution. He won the landmark 2nd Amendment case and a Religious Freedom case before the Supreme Court, as well as seven other Supreme Court cases.

He is the only person in the race who has a 100% rating as a Conservative.


41 posted on 05/21/2015 8:30:48 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

We really need to see a Congress that starts voting for freedom instead of more surveillance and more restrictions and always less freedom. That process of freedom starts out by voting to maintain our rights.

The other thing we need is a government that actually holds those entrusted to protect us fully accountable when they do screw up. Why was no one held accountable after 9-11? Had it been diverted the world and USA would look much different. Our government allows too much internal CYA instead of full transparency.


42 posted on 05/21/2015 9:39:41 AM PDT by apoliticalone (Free speech and the 1st A is dead when it becomes illegal to criticize illegals or any others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Rhetoric versus action: “Although Cruz did once vote to re-authorize the Patriot Act, he now seems prepared to stand against the upcoming re-authorization vote.”
43 posted on 05/21/2015 9:46:42 AM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sefarkas
Rhetoric versus action: “Although Cruz did once vote to re-authorize the Patriot Act, he now seems prepared to stand against the upcoming re-authorization vote.”

You keep using that phrase, I do not think you know what it means.

Cruz has taken the principled, constitutionally correct position that the NSA SHOULD NOT be collecting email communications of citizens without a search warrant.

Scott Walker has taken the GOP-E position that National Security is more important than your 4th amendment rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

THIS is where the rubber meets the road!

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
44 posted on 05/21/2015 9:54:50 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

I agree with you that Cruz has an excellent record as a conservative. But that doesn’t justify supporting an exception to the Bill of Rights, just because of his fear of a terrorist attack.

There is always a reason to make an exception to our fundamental constitutional guarantees. I remember that many conservatives supported Bush when he denied basic constitutional rights to suspected terrorists as well as members of the general public because he felt it was necessary to combat terrorism. I think most are embarrased by that now.

We should remember why these rights are guaranteed under the constitution, Our nation’s founders knew the dangers of a tyrannical federal government, and they put these fundamental guarantees in there to protect us. Let’s respect their wisdom.


45 posted on 05/21/2015 10:28:39 AM PDT by paristexas (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: paristexas

What part of the USA Freedom Act, specifically, do you believe violates the Bill of Rights? I’m interested because I recognize the need for agengies to be able to track the movements of terrorists, but I, too, am concerned about retaining our rights.


46 posted on 05/21/2015 10:56:26 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
You can have your own opinion, but the facts are: "... Although Cruz did once vote to re-authorize the Patriot Act ..."
47 posted on 05/21/2015 5:42:36 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sefarkas
You can have your own opinion, but the facts are: "... Although Cruz did once vote to re-authorize the Patriot Act ..."

No, not an opinion, just a set of facts that must be inconvenient for you since you seem to want to walk right past them:

1. Ted Cruz does not believe it is OK for the NSA to take your emails without a Warrant.
2. Scott Walker believes that the NSA has every right to take your emails without a Warrant.

One really believes in the Constitution, including the 4th amendment, the other, apparently, has not read the Constitution or will have trouble taking the oath to defend and protect the constitution if he were ever given the opportunity.
48 posted on 05/21/2015 7:33:01 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AlanGreenSpam
What I like about Walker is that Wisconsin - the recall and then the re-election - has battle hardened him in a way the other contenders are not. He's a no-nonsense guy.

Honestly I don't have a candidate at this point, but Cruz and Walker are neck-and-neck. Cruz's 500% increase in H1B works impacts my industry and is cause for concern.

These two are the best of an imperfect bunch.

Walker/Cruz '16

49 posted on 05/21/2015 9:35:41 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SpeakerToAnimals

“If you want to live in a police state, move to one.”

What makes you think I don’t already live in one? Not that I want to but according to the law here I am not allowed to burn a cardboard box outside even though I live on eight acres in the country. That is just one indication that tells me I already live in a police state. Also I cannot legally drill a water well to furnish my water without state approval and even with their approval I cannot connect that same water supply to two dwellings on the same property. Sounds kind of like a police state to me. I could go on but I have other things to do now. I will simply close by asking, if this ain’t a police state how will I know when it becomes one?


50 posted on 05/22/2015 6:48:34 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism, regardless of the race of the racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson