Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United Technologies Plans to Sell or Spin Off Sikorsky Unit
New York Times ^ | June 15, 2015 | By Chad Bray

Posted on 06/15/2015 9:37:47 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

LONDON — The United Technologies Corporation said on Monday that it planned to either sell or spin off Sikorsky Aircraft, the maker of the Black Hawk helicopters favored by the United States military.

The announcement follows a review of strategic alternatives for the 90-year-old Sikorsky business that United Technologies conducted this year. A decision on whether to spin off or sell the business is expected by the end of the third quarter and is subject to the approval of the company’s board of directors.

“Our strategic review has confirmed that exiting the helicopter business is the best path forward for United Technologies,” Gregory J. Hayes, the United Technologies president and chief executive, said in a news release.

“Sikorsky is the world’s premier helicopter company, and through a series of strategic wins is well positioned for long-term growth,’’ he said. “However, separation of Sikorsky from the portfolio will allow both United Technologies and Sikorsky to better focus on their core businesses. Over the coming weeks, we’ll determine whether a spinoff or direct sale is the best way to enhance Sikorsky’s long-term success and create the most value for customers and shareholders.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/15/2015 9:37:47 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“Spin off” is not something you want to hear from a helicopter manufacturer. ;-)


2 posted on 06/15/2015 9:39:05 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

So all the much ballyhooed convergence/leverage/integration payoffs when the purchased them 5-10 years ago didn’t come to pay off afterall. Curious if it was the culture or the technology that didn’t quite work out. I’m guessing the former.

Wonder what they’re stripping out of the package to keep for themselves long term.


3 posted on 06/15/2015 9:41:51 AM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

I’ve seen that happen with several aerospace companies. previous competitors merge, and then try to unify the culture. Often, it does not work, and eventually, the result is this.


4 posted on 06/15/2015 9:47:24 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Probably the worst kept secret for quite a while. Wonder who will buy them. Seems like a stable business. You see alot of helicopters in use these days. But what do I know.
5 posted on 06/15/2015 9:47:51 AM PDT by McGruff (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
I hold a wide portfolio of stocks, and have noticed a spate of "spin-offs" in recent months (often combined with reverse-splits and a reduction in dividends - so that, after completion, I no longer held 100 shares of stock ABC paying 2%, but rather, e.g., 500 shares of stock DEF paying 1% and 1,666 shares of stock XYZ paying 0.5%).

None of those "spin-offs" had any beneficial effect upon the share-price.

Also, while I may have original held stock in, say, a telecommunications company, I then ended up holding shares in one company that owned and leased out telecom infrastructure (and which had inherited most of the company debt) and a second company which actually operated the infrastructure (but was largely debt-free).

To add to the confusion, one of the new companies may still retain some equity in the spin-off. Mighty confusing.

Just sayin'.

Regards,

6 posted on 06/15/2015 9:55:11 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
The United Technologies Corporation said on Monday that it planned to either sell or spin off Sikorsky Aircraft, the maker of the Black Hawk helicopters favored by the United States military. The announcement follows a review of strategic alternatives for the 90-year-old Sikorsky business that United Technologies conducted this year. A decision on whether to spin off or sell the business is expected by the end of the third quarter and is subject to the approval of the company’s board of directors.

It was just a year ago that Sikorsky won the bid to make the S-92 the next "Marine One" POTUS helicopter. What happened?

7 posted on 06/15/2015 10:02:04 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
"What happened"

They are claiming Off Shore Oil Helicopter Sales are trying up. Thank you Lear Deader, or thank the Fracking Revolution.

I also wonder if UTX is trying to get out a market that might have a number of the functions that require a man carrying sale-able item be seemed as way too expensive with the advent of UAV's and their capabilities increasing exponentially and not just small little electric jobbies. It may not be in their wheelhouse given they sell bigger Helicopters, but these advances could encroach into their territory. Maybe they are getting out while the gettin' is good...

8 posted on 06/15/2015 11:04:54 AM PDT by taildragger (It's Cruz & Walker. Anything else is a Yugo with Racing Stripes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

United Technologies has owned Sikorky since the 1930’s.

One big problem with Sikorsky is that almost all of their helicopters use UTC’s competitors engines.


9 posted on 06/15/2015 11:08:43 AM PDT by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

What happened is they want to sell at a profit.

Only Losers sell at a loss. Someone else can make money off future government helicopter sales (and move the work out of CT, who knows)

UTC doesn’t want to be the one seen moving jobs out of CT, when they are getting huge tax breaks from CT.

I’m not saying UTC won’t buy something stupid with their Sikorsky cash stash, but There are a lot of businesses out their that are closer to their core that they should look to purchase (like current, high volume suppliers to their other core businesses).


10 posted on 06/15/2015 11:19:49 AM PDT by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: UNGN
UTC doesn’t want to be the one seen moving jobs out of CT, when they are getting huge tax breaks from CT.

Excellent observation.

11 posted on 06/15/2015 11:30:55 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I fish the Housatonic River right near the plant below Derby,CT.

Great watching the Blackhawks buzz around after repairs. Fly right over us.


12 posted on 06/15/2015 11:34:37 AM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UNGN

Hmm maybe I’m confusing it with a ge bid in the same timeframe


13 posted on 06/15/2015 12:37:04 PM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
June 2, 2015

(Reuters) - Sikorsky Aircraft, a unit of United Technologies Corp, on Tuesday said it would cut 1,400 jobs and consolidate facilities, with lower oil prices sharply reducing demand for helicopters in the oil and gas sectors, and international military orders down.

Sikorsky spokesman Paul Jackson confirmed the job cuts, in which workers and the company's union were notified earlier Tuesday, but said the move was not related to the parent company's ongoing review of strategic options for Sikorsky.

______________________________________________________

“Sustained decreases in oil prices continue to drive significant declines in capital investments by oil companies in offshore oil exploration projects impacting Sikorsky and resulting in reduced production levels,” Jackson said.

He said demand for certain international military products had also dropped.

United Technologies in April cited pressure in the oil and gas sector as it reported an 11 percent drop in Sikorsky's first-quarter operating profit and a 7 percent decline in sales.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/02/united-tech-sikorsky-idUSL1N0YO1HK20150602

14 posted on 06/16/2015 8:06:24 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson