Posted on 06/28/2015 9:13:06 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
I predict you are correct. Most churchs have been slowly doing this for years anyway.
I work at a large company that is probably 98% minority and all of them do NOT support homos, but they all still defend obama every chance they get.
You figure it out for me.
Money, or at least the prospect of it.
This is why the 16th amendment and incomes taxes were evil from the start. People wanted way back then in 1913 that this was not a good idea, but idiot Americans didn’t listen. They just wanted to “soak the rich”. They did, and got soaked themselves. You can’t play with fire and not burn yourself.
Very good point. Liberals often confuse, perhaps deliberately so, cause and effect. They think if they can force someone at the point a gun to say what they want to hear that their views will be sanctioned. At its core, modern day "liberalism" is the worship of the null.
The supremes ruled gays have a constitutional right to marry. Since this was a right granted by the government, not a religious right, the church won't have to marry gays. The church is a private institution, with membership, and won't be forced to marry gays. Even if they did, if I were the pastor, I would simply quote scripture regarding homosexuality and take it to the nth degree. How many homos would want their wedding presided over by a ceremony filled with condemnation. It would be the church's right to provide that type of ceremony. Any takers?
Btt
Next is an attempt to use the state to silence first, then force action in support of their sins, then finally persecution.
Furthermore, First Amentment religious and speech freedom will be drastically reduced by "politically correct" restrictions of what "they" consider "hate speech," which is scriptural TRUTH SPEECH!!!
Genesis 19:23
By the time Lot reached Zoar, the sun had risen over the land. 24 Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the Lord out of the heavens. 25 Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, destroying all those living in the cities—and also the vegetation in the land.
Would that include mosques?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.