Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Orders Cities And Towns To Racially Integrate
The Daily Caller ^ | July 8, 2015 | Rachel Stoltzfoos

Posted on 07/08/2015 1:19:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

The Obama administration unveiled new rules Wednesday to rid the country of racially segregated neighborhoods by directing cities and towns to set goals for reducing segregation, and then regularly report their progress to the feds.

Communities nationwide will be given a series of questions designed to help them figure out whether racial bias is causing segregated neighborhoods, racial or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, unequal access to opportunity or disproportionate housing needs in their jurisdiction. They will be required to set goals related to that data and publicly report on their progress every three to five years.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development rule is intended to prod communities to meet fair housing standards established in the Fair Housing Act of 1986, by making previously unavailable or unreliable data accessible to the public, which could then use the data as an impetus for change.

The Fair Housing Act requires the government to not only eliminate racial discrimination in housing, but also to encourage racially integrated neighborhoods.

“This is the most serious effort that HUD has ever undertaken to do that,” HUD Secretary Julian Castro told The Washington Post. “I believe that it’s historic.”

HUD will compile the data into a central database where anyone can look at the mapped data and determine what kinds of changes need to happen in their community. HUD will support communities working to integrate and federal dollars will be on the line.

The rule follows a Supreme Court decision, based on the Fair Housing Act, that any housing policy that disproportionately impacts minorities can be targeted in a lawsuit, regardless of the intent of the policy. It could indirectly force some states to move Section 8 housing to high-income suburbs.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blacksupremacists; blacksupremacy; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

So hillary is going to have Janiqua and Jamal as neighbors in Chappaqua?

Obviously not. This doesn’t apply to the ruling elite. Only to the working White.


21 posted on 07/08/2015 1:35:23 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And when middle class, mostly white, but also black and Asian, people move into urban neighborhoods and rehab their houses, they get accused of gentrification.


22 posted on 07/08/2015 1:35:50 PM PDT by Daveinyork ("Trusting government with money and power is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wetgundog

“Pushing for more $1.00 homes at auction.”

Don’t forget that after you ‘win’ the auction you’re on the hook for all the back taxes and past-due city utility bills.


23 posted on 07/08/2015 1:36:17 PM PDT by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

people live where people want to live and Obama will be a FAIL at this as well


24 posted on 07/08/2015 1:37:11 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Unfortunately, if you get too many Section 8 residents in an area, the neighborhood starts to go ghetto.

And when that happens, a vicious cycle is in place, where decent people move away. And then the only people living in the neighborhood are Section 8 people.

All this will do is encourage decent people to move to farther and farther out suburbs, or rural areas. This could cause more and more traffic on highways, as people live so far away from work in the city, but commute to the city from more distant areas.

This could increase liberal angst about global warming with more and more cars driving further and further. Has Obama thought this through, that his policy could increase global warming, which he has called the greatest threat humanity has ever faced, or some such garbage???


25 posted on 07/08/2015 1:42:08 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
.......which could then use the data as an impetus for change lawsuits .

There, I supplied the needed correction.

26 posted on 07/08/2015 1:42:13 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Stop being logical. It’s racist.


27 posted on 07/08/2015 1:44:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("One man with a gun can control a hundred without one." -- Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: molson209
people live where people want to live and Obama will be a FAIL at this as well

If that were that only true.

How Obama Is Robbing The Suburbs To Pay For The Cities

28 posted on 07/08/2015 1:48:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("One man with a gun can control a hundred without one." -- Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I get it! Now some of those people who can afford nice homes will have to surrender their homes to poverty-stricken people. Then the rich people will have to move to the poverty-stricken projects in order to maintain integration, right?

Man, some people are SO smart! /s


29 posted on 07/08/2015 1:51:13 PM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Why does every totalitarian, political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Communities nationwide will be given a series of questions designed to help them figure out whether racial bias is causing segregated neighborhoods, racial or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, unequal access to opportunity or disproportionate housing needs in their jurisdiction. They will be required to set goals related to that data and publicly report on their progress every three to five years.

Who's going to require them, what jurisdiction do the Feds have over communities...none, and they can't require anyting...what's going to happen if they don't comply. I've lived in an integrated neighborhood for 27 years. It was integrated when we moved in, and it's still integrated today. Same ratio for years, about 50/50, and lowest crime rate in the city. Nobody required anyone to make our neighborhood integrated, it just happened, and we like it that way.

30 posted on 07/08/2015 1:56:38 PM PDT by Dawn53Fl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sounds about right - Zero and the regressives blatantly and intentionally stir up more racial hostility than we’ve seen in years and THEN order us all to start sharing our neighborhoods with the malcontents and crime lords. Everything these people do is intentional evil all the time. It’s all part of the plan.

When they go after the flag, it won’t surprise me. She doesn’t fly over anything we once knew as the USA anyhow. It’s over.


31 posted on 07/08/2015 1:59:56 PM PDT by bluejean (The lunatics are running the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wetgundog

Yep.

Homes will be vacated and dispersed to former project inhabitants.


32 posted on 07/08/2015 2:01:55 PM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
One solution may be for the suburbs to incorporate and form their own cities

Suburbs secede from Atlanta

33 posted on 07/08/2015 2:03:31 PM PDT by Galatians513 (this space available for catchy tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

So, cities, towns and municipalities who are already
struggling to meet the budget set by current taxation
are going to have to spend more time and people and
money to fulfill these new requirements?

Can you say less services and MORE TAXES?

The liberals win either way...


34 posted on 07/08/2015 2:05:48 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“... that any housing policy...”

There you go. If you have a “housing policy” immediately rescind it and operate with a free market non-policy. When the Feds send their questionnaire, just state that you have no policy and that they should eat dog feces with a dirty fork and die.


35 posted on 07/08/2015 2:13:04 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (No matter the laws that get passed or the edicts given they are just queers, freaks and perverts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galatians513

Get a prison. That will skew the census data enough to make your community the poster child for whatever it is that the progressives are locking for. If the government wants integration, they should concentrate on programs which have segregation as the objective. Federal programs never work: war on poverty, war on drugs, department of education. All the government achieves is to create federal jobs for otherwise unemployable college graduates as a sort of middle class welfare system for its chosen ones.


36 posted on 07/08/2015 2:15:16 PM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dawn53Fl
" Same ratio for years, about 50/50, and lowest crime rate in the city."

What city is that?

37 posted on 07/08/2015 2:18:40 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Number 1 target area - 5 acres on a private lake owned by Joe Insurance Policy.


38 posted on 07/08/2015 2:28:29 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

ESADBHO


39 posted on 07/08/2015 2:33:05 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Civil rights are for civilized people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You first, racist Commie.


40 posted on 07/08/2015 2:39:17 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson