Posted on 07/14/2015 6:36:24 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
No, it means they don’t know how to rattle him.
Sounds like the makings of a great chief executive.
If Scott has a very strong sense of right and wrong, why hasn’t he imbued this to his wife and kids?
It sounds like a house divided......the sons are ‘passionate’ for gay marriage.....the wife is good with it too cause she has a lesbian aunt who recently married another lesbian.
You can’t make this stuff up.
Scott Walker talks too fast. Reagan spoke deliberately at a slower rate and was inherently more believable because of that. The baritone voice didn’t hurt, either. If Walker could slow down the delivery and limit his presentations to three or four consistent goals and attendant methods, he would go far to replicating Reagan’s success.
C’mon Scott get with the times. Everything is relative. There is no such thing as Right or Wrong. There is no such thing as Good and Evil. Now we have even learned there is no such thing as Man or Women.
Dang! We is so smart!
Walkjer and Cruz, are all doing well in that regard. Trump has “hit back” a bit and has weakened his position because of it. I would rather see these three stick to goals optimistically presented and abjure attacking other Republicans, nominal or not, while pretty much ignoring Democrat and MSM attacks i.e. not responding. Reagan showed how this approach wins.
It’s a very telling article!
READ the article.
. . . or, in not being a political prostitute. But that's a species that may not be imaginable in the WP world.
He may or may not be the man we need for this election. I think whoever it is needs a fundamental understanding of the peril of uncontrolled immigration, and a willingness to be like Ronald Reagan, ignore the advice of advisers (including family) and "fundamentally transform" the immigration process. That is, to reverse it, and re-found America's understanding of our Constitution and our heritage.
He's got the resolve, but he doesn't seem to grasp as yet that without Americans, there is no America.
If you haven’t had a chance yet, check this out:
http://conservatives4palin.com/2015/07/gov-scott-walker-%E2%80%A2-one-on-one-%E2%80%A2-hannity.html
Hannitys interview with Scott Walker last night.
Perhaps they should have described him as unflappable instead...
And....?
????
January 3, 2011 - Walker assumes Office of Governor of Wisconsin.
June 27, 2011: Walker Revokes In-state Tuition For Undocumented Students Attending Univ And Colleges In Wisconsin [ONLY STATE THAT HAS DONE THIS] "- On Sunday, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker (R) signed his two-year 2011-2013 budget, which included ending in-state tuition for undocumented students attending public universities and colleges. In-state tuition for undocumented students was approved two years ago by former Governor Jim Doyle (D) after the Hispanic community struggled for 10 years to pass it."...
March 2015: We strongly dispute this account. Governor Walker has been very clear that he does not support amnesty and believes that border security must be established and the rule of law must be followed. His position has not changed, he does not support citizenship for illegal immigrants, and this story line is false, she announced in an email to journalists Thursday afternoon.
I made it clear that for me, if somebody wants to be a citizen, they need to go back to their country of origin, get in line, no preferential treatment, Walker said. In terms of what to do beyond that, again, thats something we got to work with Congress on.
Breitbart: Conservative Media Rallies to Walker After Tough Talk on Legal Immigration "The conservative movements leading media icons lined up to back Scott Walker after the media attempted to lynch him for talking tough on immigration.
After being attacked by outlets such as MSNBC, Mother Jones magazine and the Huffington Post, Walker stayed the course, telling the Quad City Times on Friday that American workers had to come first...."
Peter Barca is the Wisconsin equivalent of Nancy Pelosi...lead fleabagger.
Figured you needed a break from defining others the way that you want them to be perceived, and read instead what people, who actually know him, have to say.
I can imagine!
Surely you are familiar with Ronald Reagans children, Patti and Ron - should we judge Reagan a failure by your standard also?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.