Posted on 08/07/2015 10:48:32 PM PDT by euripides-eumenides
VERY TRUE Walker is a quiet FIGHTER!!!! The bottom line here is WE ALL WANT A WALL!!!!! The bigger thing is WE want SOMEONE not beholden to BIG DONORS the ONLY person NOT beholden to big donors is Trump!!!!! In the end WE ALL know both Cruz and Walker will end up just like the rest of the cesspool because of THEIR money!!!!!
I believe that nearly all (if not literally all) of the people on the Cruz-birther threads like Cruz’s politics. Just saying it’s a bit tough to label them as “anti-Cruz” when they really like the guy.
Trump does make statements that are “outrageous” to the media and political elite. To them he is definitely a loose cannon, Which ironically is one of the primary reasons he has been electrifying the Republican primary. When is the last time 24 million people tuned in to watch a Republican primary debate? Oh yeah... never. He is forcing the field to answer questions that mealy mouthed politicians would normally not address.
Is this a good thing or a bad thing? You seem to think that it is a bad thing, a “Dhimmi dream”. I tend to feel that ultimately it may be a good thing. Trump has tapped into politically incorrect fears for the country that most people whether liberal or conservative are feeling right now.
Fear is a much stronger motivator than “hope and change”. I believe Trump has tapped into fear and it has the potential to steam roll the normal liberal agenda. Ridicule the normal weapon of choice for Alinski following Democrats just isn't effective when people are genuinely fearful. Global Warming is the scariest thing the Democrats currently have in their arsenal and it really isn't cutting it any more. We have got trouble in River City my friend with a capital T and that T stands for Trump. But I would rather have him on our side than against us.
As far as him being a Dhimmi of Muzzi dream; I couldn't disagree more. They are more afraid of him than any other candidate in recent history... I hope that he has good security because our enemies tend to sense a powerful leader before we do. I don't know if they have the ability to knock him out with their traditional Alynski tactics. He throws it back in their face with an “I know you are, but what am I type of response that is very entertaining and strangely effective.
I don't know how this will all turn out but we can definitely look forward to some good political theater for the next year or so. It is getting our side a lot more of the spotlight than we normally would get and I think that is good.
Eric is a liberal uniparty guy, not a conservative. Megyn Kelly is a liberal who pretends to be conservative until it is gotcha chance at election time. (Like O’Reily who pretends to be a conservative but always makes excuses for Obama and interviews him favorably.) Eric is super politically correct - uniparty style. Any conservative candidate who associates with Eric’s organization is questionable to me.
Eric is trying to turn Trump against “conservatives” by pretending to be one and then shutting him out because he knows it could give Trump the excuse to run third party and put a liberal Dem. in office. He wants Trump to shut up and leave...run third party.
Many of our older “conservative” groups have been bought by the uniparty and are no longer conservative. It’s like libertarians pretending the Tea Party is liberaltarian and not conservative. The Heritage Foundation...Norquist...
Looks like the Megan Trump fake fued was planned from the get go. Kinda like the way the Mexican Drug Cartels use attractive females as assassins.
Just wait.....before long, Trump and Megyn Kelly will be great friends.
Agreed.
But, that means that, IMHO, they're both sharks, so neither of them should expect to be coddled.
If his "blood" comment was the reference that so many people seem to believe it was, then he would deserve the criticism. The issue isn't about men vs. women. If a female candidate publicly criticized a journalist by making a reference to a male body part - or if MK made a comment about Trump's body part - she would be rightly criticized.
It's just that there's no proof that Trump's thought process was going in the direction that people believe it was with that "blood" comment. And now he himself is saying that his comment was misunderstood. But the press is never going to let it go now.
LOL. A perfect analogy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.