Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/16/2015 7:28:01 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Bigtigermike

She is now open to total ridicule. 99% of Americans who have never worked in intelligence and security know that her failure to secure her email was completely stupid, …..or something worse.

She “worked” as the top diplomat, yet has no comprehension at all of how communication ought to work in that environment.

Her rivals will make mincemeat out of her on this issue. Even Bernie Sanders knows better.


57 posted on 08/16/2015 8:22:33 AM PDT by cookcounty ("I was a Democrat until I learned to count" --Maine Gov. Paul LePage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike

“Justice” might as well be defined by dictionaries as a synonym for “sodomy of the U.S. Constitution” if Hillary is not indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced to hang for giving aid and comfort to the enemy.


60 posted on 08/16/2015 8:24:45 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike

My main question that I yet to see answered except in the negative: Were these email classified when she sent or received them? If not, then this is purely political and my prediction is that she weathers the criticism.


61 posted on 08/16/2015 8:26:08 AM PDT by Reno89519 (American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike

A reason to delay charging her could be avoiding a Presidential Pardon.


71 posted on 08/16/2015 8:38:29 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike
If they have proof of this why doesn't the Inspector General just ask Hillary...

"WHY ARE YOU LYING?"

73 posted on 08/16/2015 8:43:31 AM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike

Pol Pot could be running and the Democrats would still vote for him.


77 posted on 08/16/2015 9:09:33 AM PDT by cp124 (Government is value subtracted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike

Meh. Nothing is going to come of this. Oh we will see it and yell about it here, and it will show up a little now and again, but America will grow tired and ignore, and it won’t be nearly as big a deal as it is claimed to be, and the MSM will ultimately blame Bush.

/smh


83 posted on 08/16/2015 9:33:05 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson