Posted on 08/20/2015 12:53:05 AM PDT by nikos1121
ONce again, last night, O'Reilly, quotes a 9 to 0 Supreme Court Ruling that grants anchor babies citizenship failing to point out that it was a single paragraph in the ruling that was but a foot note and not about the litigation to begin with.
"The anchor baby scam was invented 30 years ago by a liberal zealot, Justice William Brennan, who slipped a footnote into a 1982 Supreme Court opinion announcing that the kids born to illegals on U.S. soil are citizens. Fox News is treating Brennan's crayon scratchings on the Constitution as part of our precious national inheritance."--Ann Coulter
For years, this blowhard O'Reilly has tried, correctly, to get our presidents and other legislatures to address the immigration problem. He finally... finally...finally gets a man who gets it, Donald Trump, then he lambasts him and anyone else who tries to get in the way.
TEd CRuz has argued against anchor baby citizenship for years. Why not have an honest debate on your show O'REilly, instead of talking over people like you did last night. Devote a segment to it.
Trump, has steered the issues and the discussion on many topics. We're talking because of him.
BOR wanted to pontificate that he was “right”.
I see where this was posted earlier. I did not pick it up with my search using “coulter.” Please, remove.
Absolutely worth posting again. More gold from Ann Coulter. She wraps her snark in pure truth. Or her pure truth in snark.
bookmark
Jesse Watters (Who should get his own show) and Dana PerRINO discussed this and PeRINO was hysterical about how will we deport millions of illegals?
Cut off the freebies and most will deport themselves!
Brilliant analogy!!!
That was O’Reilly, who overall provides a net plus in exposing lefty looney tunes, at his O’Baxter worst. Where is the normal O’Reilly that would say we’re bound to anchor babies because of a footnote ? Where’s the common sense in that? Who’s looking out for the folks?
What was the case mr. bill referred to?
Why not, Fox is full of stupid blondes.
I remember BOR saying “IF OBAMA DOESN’T SHIFT TO THE CENTER, HE’S DONE!”
****As FNC’s Bill O’Reilly authoritatively informed Donald Trump on Tuesday night: “The 14th Amendment says if you’re born here, you’re an American!”****
So, if Prince William & Kate had been visiting the US and prince George had been born prematurely in an American hospital - one day he becomes King of England and then decides to run for POTUS!!!!!!!
What irony..... King George - ruler of the World!!!!!!!
It was already posted, BUT, no need to apologize because this info is too valuable to miss.
If 6 or 7 other FReepers re-post this article later in the day, it still won't hurt.
Bill blowhard is as full of himself as is his protege kelly megyn or megan kelly, and neither will admit a mistake. Piss on almost every one at fox {there are exceptions but they are becoming almost extinct}.
Anyone who spent ten minutes looking at the history of that issue knows very well that no such right comes from that Amendment or any SCOTUS decision relating to it.
RINOs, “compassionate conservatives” and the FOX media crowd perpetuate the lie because of the primary moral imperative of their political and or media life: “Go along to get along!”
Thank God America finally has Trumps, Cruz, Levin and company to GOING ALONG. [ Rush Limbaugh did say Trump's stand on birthright citizenship has people cheering, but he himself did not take a stand on that issue. Since Rush has just starting using the word "invasion" rather than "immigration" for the illegal alien flood, he's not far from making that next step.]
Trumps, Cruz, Levin and company to STOP GOING ALONG
Anchor Babies becoming citizens when their parents are not citizens, makes absolutely no sense. O’REilly is a gutless wonder who happens to play people like fiddles. He is a gutless man, who will not stand up for anything. His argument is so ridiculous, he doesn’t realize how ridiculous.
The case before the SCOTUS was not about anchor babies.
Of course not, and for that very reason, we need to deport the anchor babies with their illegal alien parent(s).
The case is Plyler v. Doe
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/202/#opinion
It was not a 9-0 decision. but rather 5-4. I just read it. Its holding was that if you have illegal kids in your jurisdiction you have to allow them to partake of public education pare passu as an equal protection of the laws matter. You can’t bar them, you can’t charge fees applicable only to them, they get to go to school like everybody else. Thats what it says and that is ALL it says.
I’m a long lapsed lawyer, but claiming that this footnote, is the basis for anchor babies as ipso facto citizens and all that follows along behind that is beyond ridiculous. The law is far from well settled, in fact it reads to me mostly against the pro-immigration crowds leaning. The opinions nowhere say that anchor babies are citizens. NOWHERE. To think of the trillions spent over this matter and to think that Brennan said the states have no legitimate right to stop that spending is judicial activism run amok. Pretend fundamental rights arising out of obscure 14th amendment cases will end in the moral and fiscal bankruptcy of the United States.
Except for Anna
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.