To: Brad from Tennessee
While the EU pours billions down a Greek drain.
2 posted on
08/22/2015 1:26:00 PM PDT by
MUDDOG
To: Brad from Tennessee
The most aggressive of the regulations requires the nations existing power plants to cut emissions 32 percent from 2005 levels by 2030 2030...sounds about right...the next ice age should be freezing everything...
Suns magnetic field in decline
No sunspots for you
Video here
The Sun is Going to Sleep
3 posted on
08/22/2015 1:32:29 PM PDT by
spokeshave
(If an illegal alien is undocumented immigrant a drug dealer is an unlicensed pharmacist)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Freaking pikers, niggardly one might say, compared to the commie in chief in the USA
4 posted on
08/22/2015 1:41:23 PM PDT by
This_far
To: Brad from Tennessee
Lysenko “Science” on full display. Sad, really.
5 posted on
08/22/2015 1:41:31 PM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: Brad from Tennessee; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; ...
The article is long oh rhetoric but short on financial facts. Apple has not spent "Billions" on green issues. The most you could point to is that Apple has made it's installations energy self-suficisnt, but that turns out to pay for itself by actually selling energy back onto the grid during times of low demand. Total cost for all of Apple's plants has been actually less than $1 billion of the several billion spent in building their server farms, so far.
- Is Apple fully in the Global Warming believer camp? Yes.
- Do they make their products meet or exceed environmental standards? Yes.
- Is Apple spending huge loads of money pushing that agenda? No, not excessively, and what they have spent has silenced the negative drumbeat they had been getting from Greenpeace for not doing enough because of Apple's historic silence on the subject under Steve Jobs.
PING!
Apple Environmental Greenies Ping!
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
7 posted on
08/22/2015 2:20:30 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Former EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson now heads up Apples environmental efforts. The firm boasts that it measures its carbon footprint rigorously, estimating it emitted 34 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents in in 2014. The iPhone 6 costs $240 to make in China: https://technology.ihs.com/528618/samsung-galaxy-s6-edge-pricier-to-build-cheaper-to-buy-than-comparable-apple-iphone-6-plus According to the World Bank, China produces about 0.7 kg of CO2 per dollar of GDP (probably lowballed due to the PPP adjustment). Therefore each iPhone results in 168 kg of CO2 or .168 metric tons. Apple sold about 170 million iPhones in 2014 which equates to 28.5 million metric tons, just for the manufacturing of iPhones.
11 posted on
08/22/2015 3:50:29 PM PDT by
palmer
(Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet into FlixNet)
To: Brad from Tennessee
"... have spent billions trying to halt global warming.
Really? Please explain.......meanwhile not being of the millennial generation and having gained a little wisdom, I don't think you can conclude something from incomplete data...i.e. the science on climate change/global warming...as the earth and Mother Nature are always changing there is precious little one can do to stop her or change her. It is enough that we each take care of our little plots, keeping them clean as well as our selves.......
12 posted on
08/22/2015 4:05:19 PM PDT by
yoe
To: Brad from Tennessee
They could spend billions on much worse, more effective disasterous things.
14 posted on
08/22/2015 5:17:45 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson