Howard Stern Predicts Donald Trump Will Win GOP Nomination Because ‘People Dig Him’

inquisitr.com ^ | 8/24/2015 | Robert Jonathan

[nickcarraway]

Please point to one post on this forum where I supported Romney in the primary.

Post 14# on this thread. We are talking about whether Trump should be supported, during this primary season, not the general election (we don't even know who the candidate will be). When I talked about the sleaziness of Trump during this primary season, you rattled off a list of candidates you supported. (Since we aren't even in the general election season and you are endorsing Trump in the primary, there is no parallel of your list from primary to general)

Now you are backtracking. Because you were not saying, "I wills upport a conservative in the primary, but I will vote for the liberal (Trump) in the general, like I voted for Dole, Bush, Romney in the general) I busted you, you can't get away with that claim.

[nickcarraway]

Nick, you’ve crossed over into total delusion here.

No, I caught you on either your deception or your logical flaw. But either way, just because you support a liberal Republican in the general election, are you arguing that voters have to support the liberal in the primary? There is a pattern here: Dole, Bush, McCain, Romney, Trump. Except Trump is much farther to the left than the first four, and would be much weaker in foreign affairs. You seem to claim Republican primary voters have to vote for Trump because only a liberal Republican is electable.

This is a workup I did on McCain in 2008. See how much support he got from me that year.

You left McCain out of your list.

[nickcarraway]

I only went by your post. We were talking about the primaries, and who Republicans should vote for in the primaries. If you have poor logic, that’s not my fault. Why trot out a list of general election candidates to justify why someone should support Trump in the primary? It makes no sense, unless you are saying, we have to trot out a sacrificial lamb. Again, it’s not my fault if your logic was flawed. Why talk about who you supported in the primaries to justify voting for the liberal candidate in the primaries?

[nickcarraway]

You can’t have it both ways. You made a list of candidates you voted for. If it wasn’t the primaries, and it was the general, as you claim, then in 2008, you either sat out, voted for Obama, or voted third party. I’m just going by your own words. Maybe you need a refresher course in logic.

[DoughtyOne]

Honestly Nick, do you think you're making points by being this silly?

You are being silly.

Thank you.  After observing what passes for reasoned thought for you, this is actually a compliment.

You want to support the farthest left of 17 candidates in the primaries.

This demonstration of your ability to reaonably evaluate the players in the field today, reveals you to be so out of touch with reality, that it's a hoot to watch you continue destroying yourself here.

You think you're scoring points here.  I'm wincing.  I'm not doing it because you're scoring points against me.  I feel sorry for you.  You truly believe what you said there.

A person who is socially liberal, and fiscally even more liberal.

Nick, Trump has balanced his balance sheet for many years.  He is not fiscally liberal.  As for his being socially liberal, it's not really true.  You wish it was.

He was socially non-commital.  He complimented everyone.  Well, everyone but Rosie and Megyn.

Someone who has a Clintonian relationship with the truth.

LOL  Flail much?

You've supported the RINO candidate in every primary except 2008, and now you want someone who is worse than a RINO.

Well these are two more mistaken perceptions of yours.

[nickcarraway]

He supports Kelo, single payer healthcare, and lefty taxes. In general, he has always been strongly big government. That is fiscally liberal?

[nickcarraway]

Nick, Trump has balanced his balance sheet for many years. LOL. You can't be that dumb. When someone says, "fiscally liberal," that means their policy, not their personal finances. You've been on Free Republic for years and you don't know that? So in your mind, if Obama, Bernie Sanders, and Dennis Kucinich all have their personal finances, that means they are fiscally conservative? Because they said Kucinich was very responsible in his personal finances. C'mon, you are either being silly or Clintonian.

[nickcarraway]

He was socially non-commital.

Ha ha. Yes, being socially conservative means how he is socially. You can't make a serious argument in favor of Trump?

Of course, I was referring to his extremist position on abortion and gay marriage.

[DoughtyOne]

Please point to one post on this forum where I supported Romney in the primary.

Post 14# on this thread. We are talking about whether Trump should be supported, during this primary season, not the general election (we don't even know who the candidate will be). When I talked about the sleaziness of Trump during this primary season, you rattled off a list of candidates you supported. (Since we aren't even in the general election season and you are endorsing Trump in the primary, there is no parallel of your list from primary to general)

You were wrong.  I told you you were mistaken.  Now you are still trying to push the point.

Nick, I told you I voted for those men.  I did.  I did it in the gernal election.  They weren't the Left-most people.  I know you can grasp that.

When you read things I've posted to you, it's okay to f-up, and misunderstand.  When someone corrects you, you're corrected.  I determine the time frame I was talking about.  You don't.

Stop your infantile moronish behavior.  It's not gaining you anything but the warrented ridicule you deserve..

Now you are backtracking.

Poor Nick.

Because you were not saying, "I wills upport a conservative in the primary, but I will vote for the liberal (Trump) in the general, like I voted for Dole, Bush, Romney in the general) I busted you, you can't get away with that claim.

Poor Nick.

Enjoy your delusion.

It's crystal clear why you can't grasp Trump.  Reality is a stretch for you.

[DoughtyOne]

Nick, you’ve crossed over into total delusion here.

No, I caught you on either your deception or your logical flaw.

Poor Nick.

But either way,

Poor Nick...

...just because you support a liberal Republican in the general election, are you arguing that voters have to support the liberal in the primary?

Poor Nick.

There is a pattern here: Dole, Bush, McCain, Romney, Trump.

Poor Nick.

Except Trump is much farther to the left than the first four, and would be much weaker in foreign affairs.

Let's just look at one of the four.  John McCain advocated for the bombing of Yugoslavia and even mentioned ground troops at one point.  LINK  John McCain advocated for transfering arms and funds to the Muslim Brotherhood.  John McCain advocated for the transfering of arms and funds to al Qaeda.

Thanks for setting me straight on this.  LMAO

You seem to claim Republican primary voters have to vote for Trump because only a liberal Republican is electable.

What I specifically said was that Cruz couldn't win because he is percieved as a Conservative.  I made no mention of Trumps standing politically.  I figured you were a bight enough guy to read Trumps poll numbers compared to Cruz's.  Perhaps I gave you too much credit there.  Your comprehension skills are rather interesting to take note of.

This is a workup I did on McCain in 2008. See how much support he got from me that year.

You left McCain out of your list.

I didn't vote for him.  Duh.

You're really quick there...  /s  

Special Nick notification activated.

IN THE GENERAL ELECTION NICK.  IN THE GENERAL ELECTION OKAY?  I'M REFERNCING THE GENERAL ELECTION HERE.

* * THE GENERAL ELECTION * *

Special Nick notification deactivated...

When normal sentient thought needs a helping hand...

[DoughtyOne]

Still prattling about that mistaken perception...

Nick, I almost feel guilty about reminding you.

[DoughtyOne]

Yes Nick, one of us does need a refresher course in logic.

LOL

[nickcarraway]

I notice you can’t refute anything.

[DoughtyOne]

You’re really quick Nick.

There’s nothing to refute.

You’re jumping to the same types of conclusions with me, that you do with Trump.

No wonder you’re a laughing stock.

[Yaelle]

You succeed very well. I’m glad you are out there!

[DoughtyOne]

Thank you Yaelle. I’m glad you’re out there too.

[odawg]

Read the whole thing. Very good.

[SamAdams76]

"C'mon Charlie Brown...this time a real
conservative is going to get the nomination.
All you have to do is vote for the most pure
man in the race. Don't waste your vote on
the man who can actually get nominated
and beat the Democrat in November.
That wouldn't be very conservative,
now would it Charlie Brown?