Skip to comments.
Secretary of State John Kerry Signs United Nations Gun Ban Treaty Against Wishes of U.S. Senate
GOPthedailydose ^
| 8/27/15
| clyde
Posted on 08/27/2015 7:01:02 AM PDT by blueyon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: blueyon
John Kerry can s*ck it.
Isn’t Obama supposed to be the one signing the treaties under the Constitution?
21
posted on
08/27/2015 7:35:07 AM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
To: katana
22
posted on
08/27/2015 7:35:19 AM PDT
by
blueyon
(The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
To: circlecity
knowing that obozo is lawless and views the UN as the supreme power over the US, the constitution nor the congress will stop him from putting in place enforcement of this UN treaty. Think social/economic collapse and Jade Helm. He still has over a year to complete his mission.
To: katana
I think they are using the back door. Remember that reverse bill that allows the Senate to pass treaties with only 33 senators?
Me thinks that we got shafted by both sides.
Wait, next will be global warming bs treaty.
24
posted on
08/27/2015 7:39:56 AM PDT
by
luv2ndamend
(Same party, different letter)
To: blueyon
More Middle of the night “Transparency”
25
posted on
08/27/2015 7:43:31 AM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
To: Maceman
Of course, that doesnt mean our totalitarian leftist government wouldnt try to implement the treaty anyway. 300 million guns and 80-100 million gun owners. Good luck with that.
26
posted on
08/27/2015 8:00:47 AM PDT
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
To: blueyon
Well, since trade deals only require 51 votes to ratify and the Iran deal only requires 34 votes to ratify, why not throw a gun treaty out there and see how many votes it gets.
27
posted on
08/27/2015 8:06:55 AM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(Trump - He likes progressive taxes and criticizes Walker for not raising taxes in WI)
To: Erik Latranyi
Exactly.
Who ever voted for that or voted to allow that bill to come to the floor are traitors
28
posted on
08/27/2015 8:09:04 AM PDT
by
luv2ndamend
(Same party, different letter)
To: blueyon
Like so many things this lawless administration does, Horseface’s action was:
Ultra Vires
[Latin, Beyond the powers.] The doctrine in the law of corporations that holds that if a corporation enters into a contract that is beyond the scope of its corporate powers, the contract is illegal.
29
posted on
08/27/2015 8:13:40 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: tumblindice
So, the question is, are the states going to allow this to happen?
30
posted on
08/27/2015 8:17:12 AM PDT
by
luv2ndamend
(Same party, different letter)
To: Maceman
Even if the Senate were to approve this treaty, it still would have no legal validity. It would require a Constitutional amendment to repeal the 2nd Amendment. Of course, that doesnt mean our totalitarian leftist government wouldnt try to implement the treaty anyway. Oh, they WILL. Obama, Kerry, and the rest of the Uniparty believe they are a power unto themselves, and that the Constitution is no longer operative. They will attempt gun confiscation as soon as they think they have sufficient power to accomplish it, at least in the Democrat-controlled zones.
This country is going to burn, friends. Get ready.
31
posted on
08/27/2015 8:18:43 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(AMERICA IS DONE! When can we start over?)
To: Ancesthntr
300 million guns and 80-100 million gun owners. Good luck with that. Very few in the Democrat-controlled zones (NY, NJ, MA, CT, RI, IL, HI, Cincinnati, St. Louis, NYC, Boston, Chicago, LA). This will be their first area of attempted confiscation, I bet.
32
posted on
08/27/2015 8:21:45 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(AMERICA IS DONE! When can we start over?)
To: circlecity
Does the Corker Bill have any application, or was it specifically for the Iran deal?
33
posted on
08/27/2015 8:23:16 AM PDT
by
Scrambler Bob
(Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
To: Scrambler Bob
"Does the Corker Bill have any application, or was it specifically for the Iran deal?"
Doesn't apply here. This is clearly a treaty and cannot be implemented by executive action alone, which is what Obama claims for the Iran deal.
To: Scrambler Bob
I’m pretty sure any treaty. While all the Congress critters are on vacation. The demo can pass this on their own. Just like Obama care.
35
posted on
08/27/2015 8:32:00 AM PDT
by
luv2ndamend
(Same party, different letter)
To: luv2ndamend
Two words: `jury nullification’.
As intimidating as the federal dragon would have us believe it is, at the end of the day all power springs from the people.
36
posted on
08/27/2015 8:37:51 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: txrefugee
Since when does the Sec of State sign formal treaties? The Constitution says ‘the president’ may sign treaties and takes effect upon 2/3 approval of the Senate.
To: blueyon
Not binding unless approved.
38
posted on
08/27/2015 8:44:34 AM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: blueyon
Defund the State Department.
39
posted on
08/27/2015 8:45:08 AM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: blueyon; All
40
posted on
08/27/2015 8:47:23 AM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson