Posted on 08/27/2015 2:23:31 PM PDT by NYer
DURHAM, NC, August 27, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) -- Christian freshmen at Duke University are refusing to read an assigned graphic novel depicting masturbation and homosexual intercourse. The university says the assignment was optional and won’t discipline the holdouts.
Brian Grasso emerged as the spokesperson for the dissenters after he posted his decision on the Class of 2019’s closed Facebook page. Opponents have done their best to mock and deride the holdouts as ignoramuses who don’t belong at Duke, but Grasso has addressed all their jibes, first to Duke’s student paper and then in an op-ed in the Washington Post, intelligently and engagingly.
The book at issue is Fun Home, a fictional depiction by lesbian artist Alison Bechdel of growing up with a homosexual, suicidal dad and discovering sex with other girls. “After researching the book’s content and reading a portion of it, I chose to opt out of the assignment,” Grasso told Post readers, explaining he was not opposed to learning about homosexuality any more than he would be with the ideas of “Freud, Marx or Darwin,” though he might find them immoral too.
“But in the Bible,” he went on, “Jesus forbids his followers from exposing themselves to anything pornographic. ‘But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart,’ he says in Matthew 5:28-29. ‘If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away.’” He then cited St. Paul to support his argument.
Grasso knew Christians would be in the minority at Duke, he admitted, but what surprised him was that Duke would blithely assign something so obviously offensive to this minority. “Duke did not seem to have people like me in mind. It was like Duke didn’t know we existed, which surprises me.”
But Patrick Reilly, the president of the Cardinal Newman Society, an organization devoted to promoting American Catholic orthodoxy at Catholic universities, isn’t surprised. “American society has been moving away from Christian values or even neutrality, especially at secular institutions but even at Catholic and other Christian schools,” Reilly told LifeSiteNews. He urged Catholic and other Christian parents and high school students to choose their universities carefully.
Other freshmen have supported Grasso: Bianca d’Souza said the novel’s ideas were important but the salacious content unnecessary and offensive. Jeffrey Wubbenhorst wrote, “”The nature of ‘Fun Home’ means that the content that I might have consented to read in print now violates my conscience due to its pornographic content.”
But others from the class of 2019 responded, “Reading the book will allow you to open your mind to a new perspective and to examine a way of life and thinking with which you are unfamiliar.”
In the same vein students wrote the Duke student newspaper Chronicle, mocking the dissenters with references to a Dr. Seuss children’s book. “Mermaid Warrior,” for example, wrote, “I’m sure there are people who think Cat in the Hat sends bad messages. That’s a big problem I have with complaints like these, ‘I shouldn’t be expected to read stuff I disagree with!’ It’s like, guess what, there’s no way to find something that everyone will agree with.”
But Grasso makes clear his issue isn’t with disagreeable ideas at all. “I think there is an important distinction between images and written words. If the book explored the same themes without sexual images or erotic language, I would have read it. But viewing pictures of sexual acts, regardless of the genders of the people involved, conflict with the inherent sacredness of sex. My beliefs extend to pop culture and even Renaissance art depicting sex.”
Inevitably, Duke itself weighed in. The book was selected for summer reading by the freshman class, explained Duke’s vice president or public affairs, Michael Schoenfeld, “because it is a unique and moving book that transcends genres and explores issues that students are likely to confront.”
After touting its artistic value and noting that a Broadway adaptation won the Best Musical award for 2015, he noted that the book was not a requirement and there would be no examination or grading. He expressed the hope that Duke’s 1,750 freshmen would arrive with open minds willing to “explore new ideas.”
But for all that, Schoenfeld did not explore the issues raised by Grasso: morality, pornography and the sexualization of relations.
FYI ping!
So now it’s not just porn, but comic book porn?
Parents, is this the literature course you want for your freshmen at Duke?
I dream of the day when stocks and pillory await those of the homosexual persuasion
people are going into debt to read lesbo porn.
an aleternative...the trade schools. 2 years learn a trade that pays good. Just paid a washing repair guy $200 and I was one of many of his clients that day.
Members of the board of trustees do have to be approved by one of the Methodist conventions.
If they quit rubber stamping appointees they could seize control of the university back.
That they did not do so after the LaCrosse fiasco proves that this stuff is in line with the people in the denomination.
re: But others from the class of 2019 responded, “Reading the book will allow you to open your mind to a new perspective and to examine a way of life and thinking with which you are unfamiliar.”
I can just guess how open these students would be to being asked to read from the Bible so they could “open your mind to a new perspective and to examine a way of life and thinking with which you are unfamiliar.” Yeah. Right. That would be so offensive and an example of cramming religion down their throat. But lesbians sex? Just mind opening.
Good this needs to start somewhere.....
That caught my attention, too. Pay Duke’s tuition to have your student “reading” homosexual porn comic books.
That's not a very good argument.
--
The author of this is a Rachel Maddow look-alike.
It's interesting to see how much the way she dresses and grooms herself looks like her representation of her father in the image above.
Typical lib tactic. Introduce something and gauge the reaction. Then issue a non-apology apology and briefly retreat. Then round up useful idiots to protest against "discrimination" and introduce the subject matter by brute force.
Don’t worry parents. The book was on Ellen Degenerate’s recommended reading list! /s
its a responsibility for them and sadly, so many are failing at it....
Hey, this dude actually looks pretty normal compared to what I was expecting...(oh wait!!!) she’s a GUY! /s
RginTN — exactly. Go into debt for this? Get into the trades, earn good money, and buy yourself some books to read at home. Porn is not literature. It is just filth. duh.
Is it necessary for them to attend this course? Can’t they enroll in another one?
Just drop it and move on.
I'm with you! The investment is smaller and the return, far greater. We need appliance repairmen, cabinet makers, carpenters, plumbers and auto repairmen.
I fix technology for some people on the side and can make that.
Fixing a washing machine would be safer than being Jim Rockford for 200 dollars.
I’m encouraging my children, even the really smart ones, to consider learning a trade. It’s a guarantee of employment.
Too bad our grammar school kids can’t toss the “I’ve got two mommies” books they’re being fed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.